@thetimes@aliceTTimes He briefly crossed 100bn in 1999 when he was 44 years old, but later fell quickly. He crossed again in 2020 where he stayed. This was really easy to find out.
@thetimes@aliceTTimes In your email you state he was worth 100bn when he was 31. But MS wasn't worth 1bn in 1986 and Gates was not worth 1bn never mind the 100bn you've claimed. Really basic fact checking all wrong.
@mbdailyshow Please PLEASE tell whoever is making the emails that they keep sending the stock market index values out as dollars...! many days now - this is the most basic info in the email.
@LastPassHelp I am paid user, can't login and recovery email never arrives to email address. Request Help Logging in link generates error "CloseErrorArgument cannot be null. (System Code) Class.CommunityCtrl.createUserRecoveryCase: line 51, column 1". Need more help
@thebiggis@davidvance Ian - get a life? Youโve dutifully regurgitated another 5 pieces of โpropagandaโ from random sources - some may be 100%, others are gammon rage bait. You are allowing twitter and crap that people post control your limited mind. Also, say 77th one more time itโs so clever!
@thebiggis@davidvance Mate you put your name and face on twitter, and dutifully regurgitate every lonely dad tweet as a daily hobby. Your compulsion to swallow and spew it back out is hilarious. And yet you think other people are being duped. Step back and look at what you are doing.
@AislingOLoughl1@theAliceRoberts How can anyone describe themselves as a journalist and not understand why a scientist would happily state this publicly. Even if you were deeply skeptical about the vaccines, you understand how the world works and some basic level no?
@zaman_anjem@dense_evi@theAliceRoberts if you reject all data from every source you donโt like the sound of, you are literally living in a created fiction. It doesnt matter what is real anymore for you, because you only accept fantasy. Like I say, you are unaware how weak minded this is, thats part of the condition.
@zaman_anjem@BrianCPT@theAliceRoberts The idea that you think your single case has any wider implications for the risk to the public is proof that your total lack of intelligence is really the biggest issue you face. You are in the (commonly seen on Twitter) position of having no clue how stupid you are.