Usually a government unit coerces bereaved families to say something politicians can exploit, such as "She would not want her death to cause further division".
If you look at the case of Henry Nowak, Keir Starmer used a phrase like this to try to silence criticism of him, to attack his political enemies, and to condemn protesters. (He conveniently ignored other parts of the statement made by Henry Nowak's father, which criticised the police and called for scrutiny.)
Siobhan Whyte shows how much Keir Starmer cares about "the wishes of the family" when the family's wishes can't be used by him as a political weapon.
🚨NEW: Football legend Harry Redknapp has spoken out on areas like Green party-led Bristol council banning England flags during the World Cup
"What is wrong with these people? We are proud to be English, that is what we are. Fly your flags, be proud of your country!"
I have absolutely had enough of this. It’s disgusting.
I have witnessed illegal migrant men at a migrant hotel near my house stalk, film, follow and harass very young girls in the park that’s right next to the hotel.
I’ve personally put myself at risk to protect 2 young mothers and their young daughters from a Pakistani migrant drinking alcohol in the fenced off children’s section. They thanked me for stepping in as they felt very threatened.
They are dangerous men from cultures that are inferior to British culture where women and girls are treated very badly.
The same is true of the country that Sadiq Khan’s family originate from; Pakistan. I’m not going to play make believe that Pakistani culture is on par with British culture. It’s not. Not by a long shot.
I do feel that we need to hold individuals like Sadiq to account retroactively. What he does is sickening. He posts dangerous things such as this and doesn’t allow replies.
Absolutely disgraceful man.
I love how The Guardian blithely reports on the Taliban smartphone ban as being an affront to civil liberties.
They seem determined not to notice any parallels between Keir Starmer's government and the Taliban.
"In September, authorities ordered an internet blackout which lasted two days and was vaguely justified by concerns over pornography; the order said the cutoff was to “prevent immorality”"
Of course I'm not suggesting the Taliban are as authoritarian or Islamist-influenced as Keir Starmer's government.
1/ Adolescence. A Netflix drama with a fictional white boy.
Parliament debated it. Into every school within weeks. To teach boys about misogyny.
That was fiction. 🧵
Let's be real.
The real reason that Britain is beginning to censor social media is because of things such as what police did to Henry Nowak.
It was covered up by the media.
But the truth came out on X.
That's why they want to censor social media.
New podcast with @PaulCoxComedy.
This week:
-Media figures apologise for getting ‘axe girl’ story horribly wrong
-Reform vs Restore battle heats up as Makerfield looms
-Reports that Ed Miliband is ‘ghosting’ Keir Starmer
-World Cup pundit hails ‘victory for immigration’
Links ⬇️
We know that Pakistan is a deeply misogynist country, with customs verging on the ridiculous, such as the brother of a rape victim being ordered by a judge to rape the sister of the rapist to bring justice and balance the honour between the families.
The Left insist, with a straight face, that when these men come to Britain they somehow become more Western than actual Western men? That they aren't over-represented in horrific misogynistic sex crimes against girls they've been told by their community leaders are "infidels" and "free game"?
I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.
I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.
The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.
Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.
This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.
Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.
These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.
This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.
These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.
And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.
It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.
These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.
Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.
Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.
Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.
Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.
NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.
And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.
Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.
As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.
Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.
@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.
The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.
In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.
Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.
The @rapeganginquiry has discovered that 13,000 - THIRTEEN THOUSAND - rapists and paedophiles were let off with a warning letter whilst @Keir_Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions.
No wonder he was so keen to sweep this all under the carpet, and now he has the cheek to pretend he gives a fuck about children in this country.
250,000+ British girls.
What's included in this report is fucking harrowing:
- A baby was abused and had cigarettes stubbed out on it while the mother was forced to watch; the baby was then killed.
- Girls were set on fire.
- Girls were sent to “red rooms” to be tortured, some of them killed, some of it livestreamed.
- One girl was raped by a dog while men bet on whether it would vaginally or anally rape her.
- Girls were forced to have abortions with knitting needles.
- Glass bottles, keys, baseball bats, and other objects were forced inside them, some shattering.
- Girls were gang-raped by dozens of men at a time in “party houses.”
- Girls were whipped, hung upside down, suffocated, and urinated on.
- Girls as young as 5 or 6 were tied up and abused.
- Girls were locked in dog cages.
- Girls were branded with an “M” for Muhammad.
- Girls were threatened with being killed and fed to pigs.
- Girls were mocked for wearing a crucifix during the rapes.
All of this was carried out by predominantly South Asian, Pakistani men, with smaller numbers from Somali, Iranian, Syrian, Turkish, Bangladeshi, and Iraqi men.
And yet perpetrators were let off, authorities turned a blind eye, and it continues to this day because people are scared of being called racist.
Anyone who covered for this needs to face the death penalty alongside all of those who hurt these girls.
I'm glad Rupert Lowe and everyone else behind this put this together; it needs to be seen by everyone.
After reading parts of the grooming gang report, I felt sick.
We already knew it was bad, but nobody had imagined it had gotten so bad so quickly.
Imagine how awful it must’ve been for the victims and their families.
“Oh you can’t call them Muslim that’s racist. Just be glad your child is experiencing another culture.”
I have no words to describe my disgust or anger.
Racism seemingly being classified as worse than rape was essential for the UK government to ensure these "Asian" men could flood the country without scrutiny. They got their voters, the immigrants got their white victims and none of us could say a damn thing about it.
This man's daughter had been kidnapped and was being abused by a Pakistani rape gang
He tried to rescue her from the property she was being held at
British Police arrived and arrested HIM for trying to save his daughter
This morning, I appeared on Good Morning Britain in a live interview about the grooming gangs. Before I went on air, I was told not to mention the race of the perpetrators. I, of course, didn’t listen.
I have now received an apology from the editor.
My interview is below: 👇🏻