Fifi

Just a tiny speck in a vast universe. I am my own person.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@then0toriousjtb Ironic, isn’t it?

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@ZandiSussex @LighterWay2Live We are supposed to believe that Charles will truly secure the safety of his son, his son’s American wife, who he and his mother b/4 him have used as a foil to maintain their shaky popularity, and their 2 mixed-race children? Oki-do-ki! Maybe the earth is flat afterall!

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@DougWahl1 Do we know for a fact that he was not invited, or he was invited, but petulantly decided not to go, especially since the lights were not going to be on him?

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@AZ_Brittney STUNNING!🤩

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@NoKingCharlie SI guess subtle color coded messages is the best you can do when you can’t speak intelligible English!🤷🏽‍♀️

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@CleoDeLoon @BCG Or moral! “I Robot” looks more and more a plausible end of humanity.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@Beno10_MFC Boy on the right has a little stud earring in his right ear!

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@Sofia50020Sofia 12

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@brunelldonald Exceptional! Congratulations, Malik Jordan.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@SarahWorkx If he didn’t kill her first (a/k/a take her life), then he wouldn’t be “the killer” who also took her iPhone, etc. It’s really not complicated at all!!! Perhaps you need to rethink your question.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@GraceGym_ 6️⃣

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@BhattiLaib9960 Be honest… You fancy him, but know you can’t get him. Hence, the tears.💔

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@Aestheticsn1 My immediate thought is that this twat is not an English speaker! (My apologies . . . I don’t really believe that you’re a twat … I trust you catch the drift of this tract and rely on your tacit agreement that it’s’ been a treat)!

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@BhattiLaib9960 Not for me… too overwhelming!

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@TotalBodyIQ @GrowSmarter_x Rent a dad?

[Quinn @Mikeedakid1]

Correcting the Record — Royal Edition

The Royal Family’s Real Estate Problem Is Apparently Less Interesting Than Harry’s Mortgage

For years we’ve been told that Prince Harry’s finances are somehow a matter of national importance.

His mortgage.

His Netflix deal.

His book deal.

His speaking engagements.

His security costs.

His business ventures.

If Harry buys a house, it’s news.

If Harry refinances a house, it’s news.

If Harry sneezes near a bank, somebody in the British press is probably writing a story about it.

We’ve watched years of headlines dissecting every dollar the Duke of Sussex earns, spends, borrows, saves, or invests.

And yet somehow, when questions arise about royal housing arrangements, peppercorn rents, royal property deals, and who benefits from them, the volume suddenly gets turned way down.

Funny how that works.

Recent reporting has raised fresh questions about Prince Andrew’s ability to generate income from subletting cottages connected to Royal Lodge while benefiting from a peppercorn-rent arrangement.

Now let’s be clear.

This isn’t about claiming wrongdoing where none has been proven.

It’s about asking why certain financial stories receive relentless scrutiny while others seem to receive a fraction of the attention.

Because if we’re going to talk about money, let’s talk about all of it.

If we’re going to talk about accountability, let’s apply it equally.

If we’re going to ask questions, let’s ask them of everyone.

What makes this so absurd is that Harry no longer receives funding from the Sovereign Grant.

He doesn’t receive public money to support his lifestyle.

He lives in California.

He earns his own income.

He pays his own bills.

Yet somehow his mortgage has become one of the British media’s favorite long-running soap operas.

Meanwhile, stories involving royal estates, royal properties, royal housing privileges, and long-standing financial arrangements often seem to generate significantly less outrage.

Why?

Why is a private citizen’s mortgage more interesting than questions involving royal property arrangements?

Why is Harry’s bank account endlessly fascinating while other financial questions are treated like awkward family business nobody wants to discuss?

The answer might make some people uncomfortable.

Because for years, Harry and Meghan Sussex have been the industry’s most reliable source of clicks, outrage, engagement, television segments, YouTube videos, and newspaper traffic.

Their finances get examined under a microscope.

Everyone else’s finances often get treated with a magnifying glass left in the drawer.

That’s not balance.

That’s not consistency.

And it sure as hell isn’t equal scrutiny.

If the media wants to investigate royal money, investigate royal money.

All of it.

Not just the parts involving the couple you’ve built an entire cottage industry around attacking.

Because from where I’m sitting, the question was never really Harry’s mortgage.

The question is why some people keep counting Harry’s pockets while looking the other way when the spotlight lands a little closer to the palace gates.

Funny as hell how that works.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@DragonPearl1952 @anna_itsonlyme One large house that they paid for to renovate and paid advance rent on that was never returned to them once they got evicted. Charles shamelessly stole money from his son his son’s family.

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@MrDavX There you go. If more than half the world says it’s a bull, IT IS A BULL! Regardless of whatever you think it is!🤣🙄

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@ProudMary963233 @ZandiSussex Her cancer was discovered post surgery unrelated to cancer, where trained papal surgeons first “thought” the cells were not cancer then decided long after the surgery, that cancer “had been present”. A rare kind of cancer requiring no testing!

[Fifi @smilingeasy]

@ZandiSussex What is with her eyes? They don’t match what her lips seem to be trying to do, i.e fake a smile!