@mbohnert That makes sense. But this path leads to the destruction of Ukraine’s infrastructure at a much faster rate; if we don’t talk about this, it means we somehow want to ignore it and live in a bubble.
@Hepeman@clement_molin That’s not what I’m referring to, and I agree with you. My point is that by presenting the losses of only one side, we create the impression that Russia is suffering heavy losses, while ignoring the price Ukraine itself is paying—which is significantly higher.
@JonSurf6@mbohnert Fine—if the choice is to speak only about the losses of one side, I accept that. But it seems to me that this creates a vacuum in information regarding the actual situation.
@clement_molin You say that no evidence is provided, yet you yourself write a lot without any evidence—for instance, claiming that Ukrainians shoot more accurately and fire fewer rounds while causing more damage, whereas the Russians fire more but are inaccurate and cause almost no losses.
@SU_57R This is of no importance to Ursula or the other current decision-makers; they do not expect to get anything back. It is not their own money—they have already secured the financial future for several generations to come—and giving away other people’s money costs them nothing.
@simpatico771 This is simply another lie from people who look at you unblinking stare of a pig—something that no longer surprises anyone. They show such a lack of respect for their own people that the lie becomes not only absurd and disrespectful, but the very opposite of motivating.
@AMK_Mapping_ A drone appeared here in Lithuania early this morning :) It crashed after flying almost the entire country from the border with Latvia; the drone exploded
@Krieg2026 It’s strange that HIMARS are even showing up anywhere at all; I haven’t heard about them in quite some time—presumably, there are only a few rounds left, making it difficult to emerge without being spotted.
@AMK_Mapping_ Is it known how many KH-101 missiles are carried on average by both the Tu-95MS and the Tu-160M? Because the TU-160 can carry up to 12 missiles, and the TU-95 up to 8. But they probably usually carry half as many as they can?
@Playfra0 It sounds much better now. I just wanted to draw your attention to the fact that in your rhetoric they are usually destroyed without any major problems, while other parts of the cycle are silenced :)
@CaptivatedJeff@SU_57R Decoy, edited video, missile missed, air burst does no damage, weak explosive, AI fake, old video, no snow, no leaves, no green, too much green, wrong colour od snow, not the gear it says it is, crew survived, it’s actually Russian friendly fire, old video, anything but reality.
@CulturaFuerza@PressTV because they are fighting an asymmetric war and such numbers help to achieve high damage, while the consumption of reserves is minimal. In this way, they can do damage for a very long time, which the USA could not tolerate
@BordignonLino@Playfra0 When this happens to Ukraine - the infantry survives and takes territory, when this happens to Russia - everyone dies in an instant.