Peter Tillemans

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

I just completed "The Stars Align" - Day 10 - Advent of Code 2018 https://t.co/oUhl7LbXRl #AdventOfCode

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

Since I wrote a CVE watching service no more daily surprises dropped. Should have done that a lot sooner.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

I wish my pre-school teacher could see this! I just levelled up on CodinGame https://t.co/9eRNoHfn1Y

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@Flowryyy_ 170 : 5x5x2 + 5! = 25x2 + 120 = 50 + 120 = 170

[Casey Muratori @cmuratori]

A somewhat common but strange response to the consumer request for AI disclosures on products is to suggest that if you did this, you should have to disclose all sorts of other things (how many people worked on the product, what other software you used, what hardware it was made on, etc.)

I can understand that some people don't like the idea of having AI disclosures, so they immediately try to think of arguments against it. But respectfully, this one makes no sense.

Product labeling requirements are driven by demand, either from consumers or from competitors. There is no significant cross-section of the public asking to know if a game was made on machines with AMD or Intel hardware. There is no significant cross-section of the industry demanding that their competitors list whether or not they used Adobe Premier.

Product labeling is not about giving you a complete set of information about how a product was made. It's about giving the consumer information that a significant number of them might want to know before making a purchase. Which ones of these get codified can be driven by consumer demand, competitor demand, or - most commonly - a combination of the two.

This is not weird. It's good, actually.

And it's especially good if an industry takes proactive steps to voluntarily label their products accurately, because then they avoid the inevitable alternative, which is that the consumer demand for the missing labeling produces a political movement which ends with mandatory labeling designed by a political body.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@tymboyszn 9554

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@thdxr Software design or UX design?

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@teej_dv Why? Is reviewing @ThePrimeagen code classified as cruel and unusual punishment?

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@Devoxx It was quickly fixed, thanks

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

#Devoxx The subtitle generation is hilarious. It has absolutely no correlation to what’s being said 😂

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

Apparently it was fixed or at least fixed itself as it is quite good now

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@tsoding I find it a luxury to be afraid to reboot. I pity the people who undergo unvoluntary reboot
desensitivity training.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@ThePrimeagen Seeing all the money they raked in it is definitely a winning strategy. Who cares what the plebs thinks.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@trashh_dev Mixed… depends on lingo of domain

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@vibeonX69 Not C

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@glwillen @ThePrimeagen Be careful of the grass.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@andrzejkrzywda In my experience that’s how over half of software projects are estimated and approved.

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@the_codewala You do not need to buy it, you can suffer for free. But no idea why you would suffer more than on Windows

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@dillon_mulroy Based af

[Peter Tillemans @snamellit]

@Hassan_Abedi @devabram Doctor, you don’t understand!!! Monads are monoids in the category of enfofunctors!!!