@Milnutting60831@leegx82 I'm not even on about that one decision. Salah went down softly. There were plenty of decisions in that match that would have been refereed differently, had Argentina been on the receiving end.
@REALEST_007@leegx82 This one is debatable, but lets accept this one. What about when Salah was through on goal? Or when Romero lunged on Salah?
Bad refereeing performances have been seen, but they become questionable when it's in favour of the same team repeatedly.
@yeatscum@MichaelAsh89491@leegx82 We're on twitter arguing on a sport they made millions from and are getting paid to speak on.
I think they're winning the intelligence debate right now.
@NotAIJustHuman@sreemoytalukdar Do I think Salah should have usually gotten a penalty? No. But looking at how soft the fouls given in Argentinas favour were, it should have been a penalty. When Salah was through on goal and the referee blew for a foul. That was the standard set and should have been followed.
@MichaelAsh89491@leegx82 Considering UK pundits are all ex-professional footballers, with the majority being award winners, yes. I take them seriously.
@jtsla4 I'm all for calling out bs traders, but even I managed to follow your calls here, and I'm down 30% on my folio.
I bought when you bought, and trimmed half at 1015 because of what you said about institutions not bidding. That was pretty clear