@TheOnlyTheooki@CherryPyunn That’s what I’m saying. And I don’t understand why the person who put the document out there is backstepping from supporting the doc. It all makes no sense and state seems deeply corrupt. All about saving the ass if whoever was there first
@korulurker@Cherivals This difference is very inconsequential to the overall story Fortsy presents in the document… however, the in-congruency of the claims makes me want to see more that this applies to.
@korulurker@Cherivals “Fortsy’s response contains so much untrue information there is nothing we can reasonably address” but you wrote a giant document that started this whole thing, I don’t understand why a response pointing out the evidence that is false here isn’t possible.
@NytaKitty@sploon_slh just to be clear I don’t have an issue with the headcanon or him potentially being canon trans in the future but saying it’s canon as of ch5 is just false information
@NytaKitty@sploon_slh I hate to break it to yall but you’re just reaffirming gender roles by saying that feminine = must be woman. As far as we know in the current text ralsei just happens to be a feminine man, doesn’t mean he’s trans. Either way trans ralsei is not canon from what I can see