so

[so @so332332]

我记得以前小伙伴们经常争论WWE是不是真摔真打，我认为是真的，因为摔跤手的伤口流血，嘴角流血、眼角流着、耳朵流血、额头流血…各种流血……怼的其他小伙伴无话可说

直到后来偶尔看到某个摔跤手退役后的纪录片 才恍然大悟，才明白摔跤手在众目睽睽之下是怎么把自己搞受伤的，事后不留疤痕不影响形象

[so @so332332]

都有谁看过美国摔跤WWE，记得很多年前老川就是常客嘉宾，应该也有相关赞助

我记得以前自己爱看送葬者和DX组合

[so @so332332]

一个绝对的物理乌托邦与相对的认知乌托邦 被不可知的神秘性完全贯穿的一切

财富、地位、身份、职业…等等细分到无以复加的等级title ，在绝对的物理乌托邦诱惑下 以相对的认知乌托邦的鄙视链思维，给以灵魂的拷问！

：“<你>是什么成分！”
：“八辈贫农，但<我>家老爷姓赵！”

有辣么一点点灰常好碗🤣

[so @so332332]

我嚓！

挠一下扭头踩油门就颠儿？😱

地沟油般的丝滑🤣🤣

[so @so332332]

我嚓！

挠一下扭头踩油门就颠儿？😱

地沟油般的丝滑🤣🤣

[so @so332332]

掀桌子！

掀桌子！

掀桌子！

…………

[KanekoaTheGreat @KanekoaTheGreat]

🚨BREAKING: Bill Clinton was directly asked whether he received a massage from one of Jeffrey Epstein’s girls, visited Epstein’s island, or met Virginia Roberts Giuffre.

LUNA: "Have you ever had contact with Chauntae Davies?"

CLINTON: "I think that was the name of one of his flight attendents."

LUNA: "She was on a 2002 Africa trip with you, was she or any other young female on that trip underage at that time?"

CLINTON: "Not that I'm aware of."

LUNA: "Did you ever receive a massage from her or anyone else on that trip?"

CLINTON: "You've seen the pictures. I was sitting and I got a back rub by neck work. And I think Chauntee did it, but I'm not sure."

LUNA: "Did you ever visit Epstein's island?"

CLINTON: "No."

LUNA: "We have Virginia Giuffre, who has testified seeing you on the island with two young girls, did this occur?"

CLINTON: "No."

LUNA: "Have you ever met Virginia?"

CLINTON: "Not to my knowledge."

Do you believe Bill Clinton is telling the truth?

[so @so332332]

掀桌子！

掀桌子！

掀桌子！

…………

[Acyn @Acyn]

Heated exchange between Hillary Clinton and Nancy Mace

[Naval @naval]

Is Traditional Software Engineering Dead?

“Does this mean that traditional software engineering is dead? Absolutely not. Software engineers—even the ones who are not necessarily tuning or training AI models—these are now among the most leveraged people on earth. Sure, the guys who are training and tuning models are even more leveraged because they’re building the tool set that software engineers are using.

But software engineers still have two massive advantages on you. First, they think in code, so they actually know what’s going on underneath. And all abstractions are leaky. So when you have a computer programming for you—when you have Claude Code or equivalent programming for you—it’s going to make mistakes.

It’s going to have bugs. It’s going to have suboptimal architecture. So it’s not going to be quite right. And someone who understands what’s going on underneath will be able to plug the leaks as they occur.

So if you want to build a well-architected application, if you want to be able to even specify a well-architected application, if you want to be able to make it run at high performance, if you want it to do its best, if you want to catch the bugs early, then you’re going to want to have a software engineering background.

The traditional software engineer is going to be able to use these tools much better. And there are still many kinds of problems in software engineering that are out of scope for these AI programs today. The easiest way to think about those is problems that are outside of their data distribution.

For example, if they need to do a binary sort or reverse a linked list, they’ve seen countless examples of that, so they’re extremely good at it. But when you start getting out of their domain—where you have to write very high-performance code, when you’re running on architectures that are novel or brand new, when you’re actually creating new things or solving new problems, then you still need to get in there and hand code it.

At least until either there are so many of those examples that new models can be trained on them, or until these models can sufficiently reason at even higher levels of abstraction and crack it on their own…

And remember: there is no demand for average. The average app—nobody wants it, at least as long as it’s not filling some niche that is filled by a superior app. The app that is better will win essentially a hundred percent of the market. Maybe there’s some small percentage that will bleed off to the second-best app because it does some little niche feature better than the main app, or it’s cheaper, or something of the sort.

But generally speaking, people only want the best of anything. So the bad news is there’s no point in being number two or number three—like in the famous Glengarry Glen Ross scene where Alec Baldwin says, “First place gets a Cadillac Eldorado, second place gets a set of steak knives, and third place you’re fired.”

That’s absolutely true in these winner-take-all markets. That’s the bad news: You have to be the best at something if you want to win.

However, the set of things you can be best at is infinite. You can always find some niche that is perfect for you, and you can be the best at that thing. This goes back to an old tweet of mine where I said, “Become the best in the world at what you do. Keep redefining what you do until this is true.”

And I think that still applies in this age of AI.”

[so @so332332]

@Himalaya_bear1 上帝从来没有设立任何分支与代言

[so @so332332]

特普西就是奔着一家去的

[RJ @RJDAIGOGO]

CNN著名评论员扎卡里亚：我为哈梅内伊死了松口气，但下一步要走向何方？川普总统选择向一个没有迫切威胁的国家开战。去年六月川普总统说摧毁了伊朗的核计划，现在他又要让我们相信，这个被摧毁了的核计划对我们构成了紧迫的威胁，以至于必须绕过国会紧急行动。后来他又宣布了真正的目的，推翻伊朗政权。可是不地面出兵就推翻一国政权，我还不知道有任何先例。关键是他参战的方式，毫无规则可言，昭示了强权即公理，而这正是习近平和普京所喜欢的。

[Coinvo @Coinvo]

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Rep. Ted Lieu says the full Epstein files show allegations that Donald Trump raped children.

[Adam KP @AdamKPx]

This is what learning looks like in spatial computing 👀

[so @so332332]

@yuyy614893671 快点扩散吧，扩散到人人拥核才够酸爽嘞🤣

[so @so332332]

@QiWang315 @TtracyS87606 @Tracy_Wen_Liu 愿不愿意都是主动选择，老哈活了这么多年是你的主动选择吗？老哈终于被弄死了是你的主动选择吗？都不是！

这些都不重要，重要在于你的选择权，规则就是选择权之所在的根本载体，而选择权本身的重要性远远不止一个或者几个老畜牲这么简单，但却会因一个老畜牲对规则的践踏而进一步失去选择权重

[so @so332332]

@QiWang315 @TtracyS87606 @Tracy_Wen_Liu 愿意？不愿意？……

你必须明白事件的本质是什么，你给出的一串车轱辘假设与逻辑与愿不愿意问题本身的无关性 以及与原本事件的相关性

[so @so332332]

咖嘛咖嘛咖嘛…😎

[Emmanuel Macron @EmmanuelMacron]

Pour être libre, il faut être craint. Pour être craint, il faut être puissant.

[so @so332332]

川粉会说：看，在川普总统英明决断雷厉风行的感召下，欧洲终于奋发图强了

见过棉裤腰子嘴，见过棉裤腰子闹脑瓜子，谁见过棉裤腰子成精的？看川粉，看华川粉，看不了吃亏看不了上当，分儿毛不用，切记饭前观赏🤣🤣

[Sophie Pedder @PedderSophie]

Macron lays out France’s new doctrine of nuclear deterrence here at Ile Longue. France will increase its number of warheads, no longer communicate the number, open nuclear exercises to other allies, and include option of stationing nuclear assets in allied countries

[so @so332332]

@TtracyS87606 价值风险之外，还会引发一系列连锁反应叠加现实风险

为啥结果导向不靠谱，就是因为太容易导致现实与价值的双重风险叠加，脱靶的隐性风险不可估量

[so @so332332]

来呀来呀…让我们一起摇摆🤣🤣

[金融汪 @yuyy614893671]

【核大国第一个反馈来了】
法国将增加其核弹头的数量，不再通报数量并向其他盟国开放核演习

[so @so332332]

普大帝就是看透了这种“对手互相盘活”的肏性才特么能一而再再而三的丝滑扩张

你们玩的简直太他妈的low了，一点技术含量都没有，全靠量大管饱可劲填

“最烦你们这群打劫的，一点技术含量都没有……”🤣🤣🤣

[so @so332332]

日本高市放屁台湾有事就是日本有事 对中国的目的 是与老川弄伊朗和马杜罗同样套路，老川借用的是伊朗和委内瑞拉，而日本意图借用的是台湾

因野心而死皮没脸的胡JB攘外，全球很多华川粉心里清楚的很，一天天装逼胡沁 就是着急吃这口人血馒头

冷酷阴毒的川高赖之流 与其一众杂碎拥趸

法克鱿兔👎

[CLEAN CAR CLUB @TheCleanCarClub]

This movie is gem

[so @so332332]

@TtracyS87606 🤣🤣

[so @so332332]

美国和以色列都不会输掉这场战争，除非扩大为空前规模与量级的世界大战，美国才会有输掉的可能性，不然的话 任何局部战争对美国来说 最坏的情况都是赢得战争输掉总统。

[Defiant Ghost @TheDefiantGhost]

Back in May 2024 before the U.S elections a Beijing-based historian named Jiang Xueqin predicted THREE massive things that sounded insane at the time... but two have already hit:

1. Trump will win the 2024 elections.

2. The United States will go to war against Iran.

3. The United States will LOSE this war which will forever change the global order.