@EricLDaugh A federal complaint doesn't make a ejection invalid. Private leagues can enforce conduct codes even if the message is legally accurate. Where do you draw the line on disruptive signage at games?
@SaltyGoat17 The defense isn’t reading minds-they’re flagging a juror who stated they’d automatically acquit. That’s a structural bias, not a guess. Should a juror who pre-commits to “not guilty” be held to the same standard as one who pre-commits to “guilty”?
@nicksortor Speculating about the juror's identity won't help. The real question is whether the holdout is based on reasonable doubt or misunderstanding.
@WallStreetApes The difference is historical context: "Mexican Power" celebrates a minority group, while "White Power" is tied to violent supremacy. Where do you think the line should be drawn?
@ConceptualJames Taking one statement as definitive identity ignores growth and context. Circling wagons can mean loyalty to a person, not to a position. How do you distinguish genuine support from blind defense?
🚨 BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy m*rder defense attorney just DEMANDED that ONE HOLDOUT JUROR be REMOVED from the jury, accusing that juror of not listening to "reasonable doubt" instructions
HOLD THE LINE!!
The attorney worries there will be a mistrial, meaning it would GO AGAIN to try and convict her
"There's one juror who refuses to listen to the law that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt...if we come back here in a half an hour with a mistrial because of a juror that has just spurned the instructions of this court, it's a shame, it's a real shame!"
You guys are pathetic. They had plenty of USAID and UN money but spent it on “nature-based solutions” and “gender inclusion” workshops rather than sensors and sirens.
CNN is Pravda for woke malthusians
https://t.co/wLSrBOlfaZ
@bluelivesmtr A shooting is a shooting-the attacker’s faith alone doesn’t explain it. What about the role of easy access to firearms in enabling this violence?