@ChuckyPolitics@Rach4Patriarchy That’s essentially what she’s hinting at lol. The cockamamie BS presented as evidence that it was someone else will crumble.
@oneandforall@buckleycarlson@BlakeSNeff@DrEtiquette The only thing they have to worry about is some Candace-inspired loon going after them. There will be no legal repercussions because they’re all innocent. A year from now you degenerates will still be prattling on about “walls closing on” because you’re brain-addled schizoids
@sillyworldI3@jamesrpickett@SethDillon If there was a subsequent cover-up (for a thing there’s no evidence for to begin with) America would be such an occupied nation that the distinction would be utterly academic.
Alas, no evidence anyone but Tyler Robinson killed Charlie.
@Pagan_Messiah@SethDillon No, it doesn’t.
But there’s no evidence some stand-alone zionist killed Kirk, or ordered his assassination. There’s no indication Tucker meant this. Anybody not engaged in kayfabe could’ve worked out what he meant.
@jamesrpickett@SethDillon You’re claiming he made two different statements. I’m claiming they’re functionally the same statement. That’s assuming Tucker originally made the distinction you say he did (he, characteristically, left it ambiguous), instead of it being a hasty retcon.
Rest is loon-coded.
@sillyworldI3@jamesrpickett@SethDillon Firstly, Tucker himself never clarified originally. He left it ambiguous. This is me being maximally charitable.
Secondly,yes it’s a distinction without a difference. If multiple intelligence/LE arms are working on their behalf (what it would entail), how can it not be Israel?
@jamesrpickett@SethDillon So, some powerful Israel-first zio that was subsequently protected by major US intelligence agencies/federal law enforcement, all of which there’s no evidence for, but not the guy that admitted it?
Come on man. Swim to the shores of sanity please.
@LostPilgrimUSA@SethDillon@SteveDeaceShow Another retard zooming in on a pointlessly inane distinction thinking he made a point.
Alright dunce: who do you think Tucker believes it is, if not Israel or some party working directly on their behalf?
The implication was painfully obvious.
@Pagan_Messiah@SethDillon Who do you reckon Tucker thinks might’ve done it, then, if not Israel or some agency working on their behalf?
Mealy-mouthed stuff. Everyone knows what he was implying.
@jamesrpickett@SethDillon Alright, let’s reconcile them: assuming #1 is true, who do you reckon killed Charlie if not Israel or some party highly adjacent to Israel?
Weasel words from Tucker. Any sentient human with a >90 IQ knows what he meant.
@GraduatedBen@captive_dreamer Turks are roughly 40% European from this brain-drain (if someone ever says a Slav “looks Turkish,” they’ve typically got it hilariously inverted) and this ghoul acts like they were but a minor nuisance.