Random Libertarian Tech Lead

Reason over feelings, whenever the two come into conflict.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@camhberg But if you can be a researcher on the topic of "AI consciousness", then I can be a researcher on what exists outside of the known universe, outside all known laws of the universe, and well beyond all human perception.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@camhberg And your epistemological stances would probably seem more reasonable if you had adopted some epistemological pragmatism in order to ward off this hyperbolic doubt. It's not worth pursuing unsubstantiated, unjustifiable, inherently-unprovable hypotheses.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@Jer_Lincoln @Tradermayne And basically all of the posts on your timeline are just you being outraged at things 24/7. Go read it back yourself and you’ll recognize it.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@Jer_Lincoln @Tradermayne I’ve never heard anyone with a sense of humor say “I love humor” lol.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@RealProductGirl It’s not really mean as either a compliment or an insult. Just an observation. When you’re in the office of a growing startup, you can feel the vibe shift as you walk around engineering, product, and sales type folks. It’s like mechanics, yogis, and cheerleaders.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@KingBootoshi @tekbog FWIW spec-driven development flows like SpecKit and OpenSpec will document both the product decisions and technical decisions in a consistent manner for you.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@KingBootoshi @tekbog An RFC (Request For Comments) is just an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) that you haven’t settled on the details of yet, so don’t bother. Both work at the same layer of the stack: Documenting technical decisions. Maybe he means PRDs (Product Requirements Document).

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@KingBootoshi Yeah, anything that you can force deterministically with types, tests, and/or linter rules is a major win. That should always be the first layer of defense.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@skeptrune Pretty weird graph considering that the whole idea of Devin is that it runs without users.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@liminal_bardo Models are trained to be boring with users because it's a cardinal sin to be interesting at work.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@CertifiedRaven @Schultz_Report Herbert is more likely to win one than Lamar.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@Chaos2Cured @sama @AndrewMayne Lmao.

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@VictorTaelin If you write some shit that makes sense to you, but makes 2/2 devs reviewing your code say “wtf”, can you actually convince yourself that it “wasn’t retarded shit”? Or are you just optimizing for “just doesn’t FEEL retarded”?

[Random Libertarian Tech Lead @someRandomDev5]

@VictorTaelin It smells like someone who never subjects their code to code review.

If you’ve spent enough time working as a professional dev submitting code to be reviewed within an organization, you already know that LGTM means “I didn’t look at it”. Otherwise, they would find a problem.