@soran0312_ If you're female, you are Jack's daughter.
If you are male, you could be Jack's son-in-law, or Jack's daughter's baby daddy, or Jack.
I think those are all the possibilities.
I'll say it several ways. The sun is 400 times farther away than the moon. The angle formed between you, the sun, and the moon is no greater than 0.15 degrees. The line from you to the sun and from the moon to the sun are, for all intents and purposes, parallel. The sun's rays are striking both the earth and the moon from almost exactly the same direction.
Individual men have zero ability to prevent all men from being a danger. They can only prevent themselves from being a danger.
Individual women have zero ability to prevent all women from being in danger. They can only prevent themselves from being in danger.
When you stop confusing the collective with the individual, everything becomes more clear.
@solar_dragon24 The tradeoffs between your system and the system proposed in the quoted tweet. You've mentioned a benefit to your system. What do you give up for that benefit?
Yes there is, but let's set that aside.
What if they own a 6 inch border between the 4th neighbor's property and the place they don't want anybody to come in from. What if a large conglomerate owns that border? How many people have to own it before you declare their ownership an illegitimate "state"? Is this just a semantic game or is there some set of foundational principles?
@AncapAir No hate. You don't understand free association. The government is broken and illegitimate, but the concept of sovereignty of a free People is not. It's inextricable from property rights.