When I got arrested for Nazi Pug, I got held in jail until my court date due to the "serious nature" of my "offence".
But the guy who threw a toddler into a crocodile enclosure to try and have him ripped limb from limb has already been bailed the very next day.
Clown country.
“I’m Muslim and those Pakistani rape gangs were not Muslim. That is not my religion.”
I’ve seen this response countless times today.
Understand this: The only interpretation of Islam that matters is the one that has enabled the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of White British girls. Your personal interpretation is irrelevant, as is mine.
Below, I will outline the theological architecture behind these egregious crimes—and why Islam, in its classical and dominant readings, is fundamentally incompatible with Western society.
الولاء والبراء
Al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ (loyalty and disavowal): This is an Islamic principle rooted in Quranic verses and hadith. It calls for alliance with believers and disassociation from non-believers. Mainstream and especially Salafi/Wahhabi/Deobandi interpretations (common among some Pakistani communities) emphasize enmity or at least strict separation from kuffar (disbelievers). Reformist or Sufi readings soften it toward personal piety. It fosters "us vs. them" thinking that dehumanizes outsiders.
دار الحرب
Dār al-Ḥarb (House of War) vs. Dār al-Islām: Classical fiqh divides the world this way. In non-Muslim territory, rules for interaction differ; some historical and jihadist readings treat it as a zone where normal restraints are relaxed or jihad applies until Islamic dominance. Peaceful modern Muslims often reinterpret this as irrelevant to living in the West under secular law. Others (including some UK imams or online preachers) maintain harder lines. It provides theological framing for parallel societies or resentment.
مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ
Mā malakat aymānukum (milk al-yamīn in shortened form) translates to “those whom the right hand possesses” (or “what your right hands possess”). It appears in roughly 15 verses and is the Quran’s most frequent way of referring to slaves or war captives (male and female) in 7th-century Arabian society. Interpreted in a certain way, it permits the rape of captives.
Aisha’s age
The most authentic hadith collections (Sahih Bukhari and Muslim) state Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and consummated at 9. This is the orthodox Sunni position held for most of Islamic history. It has been used to justify child marriage in various Muslim societies. Modern apologists sometimes argue cultural context, different age calculations, or that it was normative then. Traditionalists defend it as the Prophet's example. This precedent weakens absolute age-of-consent arguments within strict Islamic frameworks.
Combine al-walā’ wa-l-barā’ with dār al-ḥarb and milk al-yamīn. Now combine all of those with the belief that Aisha was 9 at the time of consummation. What do you get?
• Moral and religious justification for enmity toward non-Muslims as a category.
• License to operate with far fewer restraints inside non-Islamic societies, treating local laws and norms as non-binding.
• Permission to dehumanize and sexually exploit non-Muslim females—including minors—once they are classified as captives or property.
• No effective doctrinal floor on the age of sexual access, because the Prophet’s example overrides later, external standards of consent or maturity.
“I’m Muslim and that’s not how we interpret those texts.”
Doesn’t matter. This is how hundreds of thousands of South Asians interpret the Quran.
Do you understand now why this must be purged from Western society by any means? I don’t care if you’re a peaceful 145 IQ Muslim scholar, we don’t have time to figure out who’s who here. There are 3.8 million Muslims in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of thousands of White British girls were raped. The perpetrators are overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim. To the degree that if they didn’t directly participate, they knew someone who did, and did nothing to stop it.
Get them out.
Every last one.
@SCHIZO_FREQ iirc embarassment and physical pain are processed in the same regions of the brain. might be the difference between "hmmm, that didn't get the reaction i was hoping for. maybe i will try again later?" and "i will kill myself if i ever do it again"
@SCHIZO_FREQ things you do immediately after might worsen it yes, but you will look back on it and try to not put yourself in that situation again, whereas without embarassment you would double down
This judge sent a veteran who served in Iraq/Afghanistan to jail for two years over Facebook posts he made in the wake of child murders.
She also let rapist, Rees Newman who SA'd a 13 yo girl go free citing "overcrowded prisons."
Her name is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, Cardiff.
Reading stuff like this makes me want to fly to the UK and start cracking skulls. Realistically that isn't going to happen for me. I've looked into it and the best way for us, as Americans, to help is to continue to share stuff like this on social media, talk to people in person, and spread the message. The government allowed 250k+ white British girls (children), and counting, to be raped and tortured by migrants. Basically an army invaded, started raping and torturing girls and nothing was done. BTW, this is still happening now. It's not over. Girls are being raped and tortured this very moment. If you share the message, you help to put pressure on the government to do something about it.
@TakeThiamine by the way the only reason muhammad waited until aisha was 9 is because she was sick. aisha explains it by something along the lines of "he was going to marry me, but i got sick and all my hair fell out. we married when my hair grew back". anything goes for these people
My interpretation of Islam is irrelevant. It’s the interpretation of Islam by sub-80 IQ Pakistanis that allows for the rape of a quarter million young girls that I’m concerned with.
Ray Peat held a PhD in biology and spent more than five decades writing about physiology, energy metabolism, hormones, nutrition, and environmental factors influencing health, aging, disease, and regeneration. He authored well over 200 articles and five books, spoke extensively in hundreds of recorded hours of interviews and talks, and answered countless health questions via email—often for free—over several decades.
Saladino has a BS in chemistry, was board-certified in psychiatry, and is a board-certified Physician Nutrition Specialist. He previously worked as a PA in cardiology before medical school. I agree with a lot of what he says and he has built multiple successful brands, but his work now is downstream of Peat’s.
Patrick holds a PhD in biomedical science and completed postdoctoral training in nutritional biochemistry but her work hasn’t been relevant in years. She still thinks fish oil is good for you.
Asprey is a tech guy with not one formal health credential to his name.
Johnson is also a tech guy and can barely interpret a PubMed abstract without his team holding his hand.
The truth is not “somewhere in the middle.” That’s what people say when they just showed up and skimmed the cliff notes. You only think like this because you’re brand new here and this is the most convenient framework to have.
Nobody is blindly taking advice but you. Your work is entirely derivative of the latest wave of biohacking copywriters. Just because you can copy and paste a product’s mechanism of action from an LLM does not make you an authority figure nor qualified to dismiss greater men than you.
Stick to the peptides, modafinil, and tadalafil and don’t mention Peat’s name until you understand his work.