@ustyianskyi@nexora_28 I don’t think so - ramp was used to showcase suction not flying.
It’s a good prototype, a possibility to what could happen in the future. It’s hope, it’s optimism! I like optimism. :)
@monad Monad, do we have a clear timeline on integrating Quantum resistance to the network? I was research and reading about it - didn't get to the time frame. If you have one _ I would love to change a few things in my article. :)
@andyyy This reads so so so like a Naval's fan post.
Believe me, I could feel the energy and the excitement with which you have written every world of this posts.
4 blockchains can already protect your coins from quantum and AI attacks.
Bitcoin isn’t one of them. Neither is Ethereum.
Over the last month, those 4 beat both by up to 20x. https://t.co/T5sqNvuifv
@arjunkhemani When we speak of privacy and governments not able to track, how do the people see the bad actors using it? would love to read a good article on this covering different aspects like money laundering happening - bad actors making money private.
People have been so so so sleeping on Zcash and how swiftly its moving.
It's like seeing BTC when people ignored and sidelined by thinking of it as scam. People take a lot of time to grasp the frontier changes until the problems hit them.
There been many experts, researchers racing voice against how AI is catching up with "Mathocalypse", it been coming faster than we think, and many blockchains which have been ossified cause of the multiple stakeholders, slow moving no incentive foundation - it will take them many many months if not years.
Zcash could become everyone private yet ai/quantum proof asset, with better liquidity and KOLs ranging from Naval, to Balaji and Mert continuously talking about why its important.
I think BTC is all good and great, until its not - it stuck in a lot of debate on what will happen to 25% of its old era supply and slowly moving towards safeguards. Slow is not an answer to AI catching up cracking ECDSA - agility is, time battled tech integration is. ZEC is and should be everyones doomer days asset on Blockchain for the near future until every other network get their shit sorted.
No one literally no one comes close to ZEC, when it comes to time-tested tech, liquidity, networks and similar hard cap supply limit of Bitcoin.
ZEC is better bitcoin with much lower valuation. Easy 10x if people pay attention and know its worth.
ZODL for everyone who are early and have diamond hands. Keep shielding!
I think it will become a thing of world - as real skills goes narrower and people try to gamble and speculate on ideas. Mind needs something, some opinion, some context to live on.
So in my mind its not just next ten years but coming century or so.
Web3 communities are future of how world might function.
Times of Maya.
Simon, which category is mostly pitching equity proxy?
The L1s might not be, I do think many perps, DEXs, Prediction markets, RWAs, and Vault businesses - I don't see many other businesses adopting proxy value, please enlighten me with a few examples if possible.
Also are investors fine with holding equity proxy TGEs without seeing how the startup will go and revenue it would make?
There's a lot of truth in lot of things you mentioned here, its blood sucking sometimes - a lot of shills and slops.
I think with tokenisation a lot of things are changing for good - real use and real problems getting solved with globalisation of financial/capital markets.
Where you stay won't be a bottleneck for someone to capitalise from investments. Blockchain is making that happen.
@adam_winnick In simple terms - only bottleneck in a few years will be distribution and regulations (which had been been crucial but now its only what's required).
What are some of the distribution gaps people should cover when it comes to Open Finance for everyone?
Yes there are reasons behind it -
It’s either the culture established when the seeds were sown or change to auth in between.
I may blame on the right seeds not sown at the time of independence for our democracy to run on a fast track, niether internal industrialisation were pushed to export at the scale of China (funny there were reports of India being the next global economy in NY Times around 60s) - nor Indian markets were opened for Global markets.
What we had was complete reliance on the Green revolution.
Anywho, I am pro auth (not a self serving auth but maybe a nationalist auth difficult) rule in India as it will help people focus on development instead of everyone blaming everyone leading to a zero sum game. In my mind it’s either solid Judiciary (we have either corrupt or slow judiciary as such good people avoid it and bad are incentivized to go to court) or nationalist Auth rule which could change a lot of things.