Pragmatic centrist. My pronouns are M'lord/majesty. I'm antifar left and antifar right. I identify as a journalist. Supporting LGB and pre 2010 T. Radman.
@cavamarxist@WillAddedDigits Why are we arguing over our plugs when we can just laugh at americans who can't be trusted with a power supply with enough voltage to run a kettle
@drorfh Asylum seekers, if you hold their claim as valid, are fleeing from war etc, carrying with them the trauma
Why place them in those deprived areas where there are no mental health services, in poorer conditions instead of where naomi long lives where they can be supported properly
@TatenokaiGael Because we find the humour and make fun of f***ing everything
Eg, the IRA tried to bomb portadown police station twice, and both times they took out the library instead because nothing says enemy more than this:
@danae_hudlow It kind of follows that if you're going to wade into a topic, someone should know about the topic beforehand
It also follows that given there are so many irish americans, they should know what that entails
Anyway, here's a funny video edit
https://t.co/FBf6fqJ4PQ
@ashzo_@QcWynter This isn't true, cisgender was coined in 1994 on a something awful forum by dana defosse
If you're referring to cissexual, coined in 1991 by vilkmar sigush, then you're a transmedicalist bigot
If your group wasn't a social fad, you wouldn't need to lie so often
@JacobCollierMP Would you rather have massibe homeless camps, open air drug use, and $8 million dollar spends on a 64 bed modular housing like in california, which is...erm...in america last i checked
@boatlady@LeoKearse@PublicJoe31 Steohen mccullogh got 31 years minimum for the murder of natale mcnally 2 days after digwa got a 21 year minimum
Is that good for you?
@Mr_Andrew_Fox The policing guidelones push equity, not equality, and no amount of hand waving will change the fact that those are fundamentally different concepts
@ADZanderWest@CivicChronicle1 Perhaps though, since you have mentioned it, you could point me to the section in the marriage act 2013 where the word 'love' appears?
@ADZanderWest@CivicChronicle1 No. The definition of marriage stems from the religious institution of marriage which exists as a union to produce offspring, securing biological heirs for the man
The consideration of marriage for love is a victorian contrivance
@ADZanderWest@CivicChronicle1 It's simple
The voting population decided to change the legal definition of marriage. Gay people didn't have the right until the definition was changed.