spxcepxtrol

crypto enthusiast / studying MT and learning to decode the markets / father of 2 sons 💜 / 🇮🇹🇨🇭

[🎯 Master @Moneytaur_]

'Which coins will recover?'

Let’s talk hints.

1] Coins leaving HTF BBs behind, toward supply zones, above 0.5 fib of macro range. These coins are likely to recover -- it’s just how the game is programmed.

There’s no "life-changing tech" or projects revolutionizing the world. This market is a cash grab, selling dreams to the naive. From ashes it was born, and to ashes it shall return -- for most coins.

2] Coins on institutional portfolios

If institutions hold it, it’s more likely to survive crashes and recover once it finds its HTF lows. Institutions don’t shoot themselves in the foot. They accumulate for the long term.

Example with Grayscale: https://t.co/IWq5yyGI5w

Look up what big players are holding as those assets are very unlikely to disappear in a matter of months.

3] Coins that haven’t lost their HTF lows

If a coin is still holding its HTF lows, it’s not a confirmed death sentence. If it’s trading on consistent high volume, whales have an interest in keeping it alive. FUD can always hit, but more often than not, it’s just another classic shakeout to drop price into HTF key levels for those “magical” reversals. If a coin previously had a massive run from what is today an HTF demand zone, you can dig into its past liquidity -- it’ll tell you who’s really playing with it.

If liquidity was high, big players were involved. They don’t just gamble -- they accumulate with intent.
If liquidity was low, then it was just the usual CX larps gathering their cabal for another pump & dump. Understanding who’s behind the moves is the difference between playing blind and playing to win.

4] Coins that have survived multiple bear markets

If a coin has survived previous bear markets, it will likely outlast whatever new shiny object retail is chasing today.

XRP is a prime example. The average investor who has never been profitable in this game might hate it, but it has been around for over a decade, owned by major players, banks, and institutions.

Survived a brutal SEC lawsuit [smoke & mirrors] and never dropped out of the top 10. That’s real resilience.
Not saying XRP will moon or won’t moon -- but it’s volatile, high-volume, and will likely stay relevant for years. Life-changing money can be taken from it, if you know what you're doing.

Coins that fit these criteria have a better shot at recovery. The rest is heading to the digital graveyard in the not so distant future.

[🎯 Master @Moneytaur_]

@lava_xbt I definitely see it below $700 at some point in the next 2-3 years. Death valley for most altcoins by then. A lot will change, and it'll be called "maturity"

[🎯 Master @Moneytaur_]

When 'Person of Interest' started airing more than a decade ago, most people watched it as entertainment.

A machine that could see patterns in human behavior. A machine that could predict violence. A machine that could watch everyone, understand everyone, and quietly shape outcomes.

For the average viewer, it was fiction, but for the open minded, it was a warning. Because the real mistake ordinary people keep making is assuming the technology they can access is anywhere close to the technology that exists behind closed doors. It isn't.

People look at public artificial intelligence and think they are seeing the frontier. Instead, they are seeing the showroom, the polished and 'safe' version. They are seeing the version released only after it is old enough, limited enough, and harmless enough to be placed in public hands.

What you have access to is the equivalent of being handed a weak machine and being told you are touching the future. Meanwhile, somewhere far above the public layer, the real systems are being fed with oceans of data, state resources, intelligence access, behavioral modeling, market flows, satellite feeds, biometric signals, and computational power the average person cannot even picture properly. And you, the people, are funding it's growth every time you get wrecked in the markets.

That is the part most people still fail to grasp. The richest people on Earth do not live in the same present as you. The most powerful governments do not operate with the same tools you see. They do not wait for the future. They acquire it early, hide it, weaponize it, and build empires with the advantage gap. That is how power has always worked, and that's why you always feel 3 steps behind the brightest minds, always finding excuses for why you're in the situation you're in while seeing others a lot wealthier and seemingly happier. You're not the problem, you're just not given the best tools in order to progress.

The ultra-wealthy do not need to know everything. They only need to know more than everyone else, earlier than everyone else, and with better tools than everyone else. That alone is enough to turn information into domination.

Enough to front-run markets, influence narratives, shape political moods, enough to predict behavior before people themselves understand what they are about to do. That is why the real divide in this world is no longer just money, but access.

Access to data.
Access to computation.
Access to predictive systems.
Access to tools that do not merely analyze reality, but increasingly model it, steer it, and exploit it.

So when people ask what kind of AI the biggest whales, billionaires, intelligence networks, and state actors might have access to, they are usually asking the wrong question.

The better question is: How wide is the gap between what is public and what is private? Because history suggests that gap is never small.

And if fiction was already showing the public a machine like that more than ten years ago, imagine what existed then, and then imagine what exists now.

The truth is simple: The masses are usually introduced to technology only after power has already extracted years of advantage from it.

That is the pattern, the game. And that is why people who think public tools are the ceiling are looking at the shadows on the wall and calling them reality.

The most dangerous machine is never the one they show you. It is the one they don't.

[ChainHub @ChainHubCT]

Over 90% of every price reversal happen on a body. Whether it's OB/BB or HVN/LVN, it doesn't matter.

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@MariusSm1th Enjoy and take care 💯👍

[MaxO @_MaxO22_]

Just look at the collective euphoria triggered by the mere mention of "DeFi Summer" after a few days/weeks of green altcoins, like last year.

On the flip side, winter, with its shorter days, seasonal darkness, and elevated screen time, is a different but also perfect environment for manufacturing market sentiment.

Every year, they tweak the script just enough so people can't easily spot the pattern, but when you zoom way out, the footprints are undeniable.

You must look at the entire picture, not just a few lines and formations on a chart.

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@AvLabspro @ns123abc Nobody cares about the valuation if you are part of the controlling powerful elite few, it's not always about the money, but about influence and power aspiration

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@ZelenskyyUa "Hey let's mess with a nuclear superpower" Sounds retarded to me. Without european weapons and money Ukraine would long be russian territory. Gtfo of NATO and Europe. We don't want a war in Europe with Russia because of you and your mafia friends in Bruxelles @vonderleyen

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@MariusSm1th Can u recommend a broker for Swiss residents? I feel like I want to enter the world of stock trading and investing into companies with real value behind it not just a fancy crypto ticker

[Lucky Chart Ape @luckychartape]

Most traders highlight these things as their biggest issues.

1. To much risk
2. Not holding winning trades to targets
3. Not cutting losers

It stands to reason that solving these issues should improve anyones trading.

Its a simple checklist.

Am I risking to much?
Am I willing to hold this trade when it starts winning?
Am I willing to cut it when it starts losing?

If you get the wrong answer to any of these, dont take the trade.

[MaxO @_MaxO22_]

For the past year, all of my main trading has shifted entirely to the stock market. For those who don’t know why I made the switch, this post is for you.

Compared to other markets, the stock market offers much cleaner inefficiencies to exploit. Crucially, it wasn’t created with the sole purpose of draining retail liquidity. Don't get me wrong, it is still a capital-generation engine on steroids. But compared to crypto for example, the structural differences are massive.

Here is my breakdown of why equities take the crown.

The Pros

Cleaner Price Action: The stock market is heavily regulated. This prevents many of the predatory, manipulative tactics rampant in unregulated markets, allowing cleaner technical setups to form.

Real Fundamental Backing: Behind these tickers are actual companies generating real revenue. These profits often flow back into the market via dividends or buyback programs, driving genuine macro growth rather than pure speculative boom-and-bust cycles.

Insane Trend Persistence: Once trend and momentum are established in a stock, they can last for weeks, months, or even years. This allows for stress&screen free trailing and extraordinary R:R performance on selected plays.

Built-In Mental Breaks: With the markets closed on weekends, your mind actually gets a chance to rest and reset.

The Cons

Overnight Gaps: Market opening times can lead to nasty overnight gaps, which can occasionally result in larger losses than originally planned in your risk management.

Fragmented Instruments: Trading vehicles can be confusing or expensive, and availability varies significantly depending on your country's regulations.

Capped Leverage: You won't find the degenerate 100x leverage here.

Why the Pros Win by a Mile

Personally, I don't need massive leverage. Some of these tickers are so inherently volatile that trading anything above 10x is pure madness anyway.

The real magic lies in the simplicity and the massive asymmetrical opportunities equities offer. When a play moves in your favor and you lock in initial gains, the R:R on the remaining position can reach completely absurd numbers. In fact, some of my short-term plays have performed so well that I've held them for over a year as "moonbags," driving extraordinary outperformance in my portfolio.

This is hands down the most swing-strategy-friendly market I have ever seen. The macro trends a stock can establish are perfect for riding positions for months. Compared to the choppy, range-bound, PVP nature of FX or crypto, I can trail my positions here for ages. Because major stocks are driven by real revenue, you aren't buying vapourware scams that exist only as a whitepaper narrative destined to go to zero.

My Blueprint for Finding Great Tradable Stocks

Building a consistent swing edge in this market is remarkably straightforward. High-probability stocks usually share a few core characteristics:

A Long-Term Upward Bias: They naturally tend to move up the majority of the time.

Solid Fundamentals: Focus mainly on established companies with real revenue and actual products. If you do play a speculative "idea" company, ensure the narrative is rock-solid, treat it as a high-risk play with clear TPs, and leave a small runner to ride the hype as long as it lasts.

High Liquidity: Look for consistent dollar volume above $30M–$50M. TradingView displays volume in shares by default, so make sure to calculate the actual dollar liquidity.

Technical Respect: They react beautifully to classic S&D, S&R, momentum lines, and MAs.

Moving forward, I’m going to start dropping more educational content focused on the stock market.

Honestly, it’s wild how many traders miss most of the easiest money plays on the planet or even burn out, because they're too busy over-refining and searching for a non-existent holy grail.

Stay tuned.

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@WyckArchitect Did you execute it? If yes, pls show proof. Posting a chart is easy.

[Lior Uzan @CryptoBitcoil]

@saylor Bi-weekly Ponzi payments

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@luckychartape Agree more with the chop and drop, too many people underwater with their spot bags and longs, retail always longs and "buys dips", they need to capitulate, 98k would be a gift to too many people IMO. We need extreme fear and total annhila-/capitulation

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@HamweeHammy @MariusSm1th @ilprimariogia Bruh, ofc you can buy it, you can buy it 24/7 the question is, should you? One gap still open, most likely closing that one first before upward momentum gains traction again

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

When I started trading, being sidelined and not having a trade open felt horrible. Today I do my couple of trades during EU and US session and when closed I chill. Today 2 wins, 4% of acc. Now chilling and watching BTC nuke. Sadly closed short early but that's the game.

[mox @mox_HL]

$HOME 13R Trade-execution

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

8% in 1 day with 2 shorts and 2 longs (ONDO and BTC).
Limitting open trades to max 1 to not risk overexposure. Keeping strict 1.5% acc size.

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

Weekly performance @luckychartape inspired by your "slow and steady small gains" that accumulate over time. I stopped aiming for homeruns. If 5-15٪ p/m puts you in the elite trading circle, I am now where I want to be as a daytrader.

[spxcepxtrol @spxcepxtrol]

@peterh84315599 @coinbureau Thats the fairytale you bought into, there are enough examples out there that are able to time the market. Time in the market is basically hoping and praying aka diamond holding a position or bag to annihilation.