Comedian. Purveyor of snark. Software veteran. Creator of RSpec and the describe/it pattern for software description. Emotional support Canadian. π¨π¦ in πΈπͺ
@devagrawal09 First, you're saying "types" and you probably mean "static types". Dynamic languages have types.
Second, static types are neither a linter nor a test suite. You still need a linter and a test suite.
@quipsfromthekid@jakozloski Pretty much. But also, her older sister was _very_ annoyed that she'd found someone, so there might have been some spite in there too on her part. :)
Agents don't need types. They're perfectly capable of pulling off incredible refactorings without. Give them a linter and a test suite, and you have all you need. Token efficiency is where it's at.
@Fat_Electrician Because they are opposed to progress in general, but the people who are pushing it forward in particular.
It's even less grounded in reality than opposing nuclear power. (Which is not grounded in any current reality.)
I am going to practise my Swedish by writing a passive aggressive letter to the kommun about the state of the road to Junsele.
Language and culture practise: getting two birds stoned at once.
@Peakstate89@KrisztinaMaria In Sweden, the stated minimum ignores the ~ 30% that is deliberately obfuscated so that folks donβt realise theyβre paying 60%.
Usually πΈπͺ will jump in to say that a mandatory fee based on a percentage of your income autoremitted by your employer is not a tax because itβs a fee.
Sometimes I get emails marked "Important".
Does anyone actually use these these flags as a recipient? The mail goes into the same box, and I process it in the order it arrives.
If the sender can mark supposed importance, what actual utility does it have?