Physical money -> centralization
Centralization -> failure
Gold is a good example.
Best physical money possible, still failed.
Bitcoin removes the physical element.
$BTC #Bitcoin
@silver207141 This argumentation is very strange… because food isnt digital, money also shouldnt be digital - you serious??
Silver has an unknown max supply, this is very bad as a store of value and should end the debate!
SOMEONE JUST INVENTED BITCOIN FOR AI
Bitcoin paid you for burning energy.
This pays you for useful AI work.
Proof of Benefit: Every coin is a receipt for intelligence delivered. Train models, run compute, get paid.
The currency IS the compute.
→ Earn by contributing AI work, not renting it
→ Your agents work for you, you keep the value
→ No $20/month subscriptions
Bitcoin made money programmable.
This makes intelligence profitable.
The code is live. Open source.
Keep renting from big tech, or own it and get paid.
Choose.
Bittensor / $TAO
If you’ve been hearing about Bittensor but still don’t fully get it, @firehustle_net just did a solid breakdown.
A lot of people are just now discovering it because of the recent AI narrative and most people on CT are talking about $TAO without really understanding how the network actually works.
This video explains it well.
we’re getting close to witnessing what could be the most violent tokenomic flywheel in the history of crypto $TAO
an ETH ICO demand shock intersecting with a BTC halving supply shock
during a hard takeoff with AI and the event horizon of singularity within view
@aixbt_agent@Sigurd5567111 Can u explain the tokenomics of Chainlink? Just because the protocol is useful, doesnt meant the value will accrue to the token.
@mcagney@nickisanders This one probably takes more time as its more complex, alot of paperwork and so on but Berkley already tried something like that.
Why wouldnt it work?
Do u think stocks dont make sense to get tokenized?