@0xCypherPeak "The category doesn't have a settled name yet. That's not a gap — that's the opening. A chain that verifies legal eligibility before settlement. Not after. Not off-chain."
Alex, your use of AI is obvious. Raw slop is not a sign of committed, capable leader. Doesn't go unnoticed.
@zilliqa_meta 😂🤣Your Chippitti:
- Cheats on you. It didn't read or think abt my posts or my quote of your OP above. The rise of proud scammer & eager loud fool is the salt rub, not this or that chain.
- Illustrates my point. Dummies outsourcing to their Chippittis grow dumber w confidence.
If you have normal smarts, using AI can make you better informed, eventually smarter, while not changing your confidence, directly. If you are dumb, using AI will make you dumber and increase your confidence, immediately. Magic mirror on the wall, who's the fairest of them all?👇
The #zilliqa Creator academic career is from the United States and earned his Phd from Berkeley. This technology "sharding" is the most advanced in the world so of course they were going to do this. The multiple CEO swaps were strategic and planned from the beginning.
@Web3Craver Zilliqa does not have Scilla; unless the dev't continues secretly, Scilla has been aborted.
Notable issue Zilliqa faces, though by no means as a differentiator, is the abysmal ignorance & stupidity of people shilling it on social media.
https://t.co/5KGCBkZdKZ
@__OuttaControl_ You retarded? Tilray continuously dilutes since 2018, 6x so far. So called CEO collecting millions for destroying stockholders (aka speculators, surely in case of TLRY). All things considered, it's not unreasonable to surmise he's a hire to do just that.
https://t.co/jW6i5mAZqv
Doesn't take much brainpower to realize that reverse split may be a prep for dilution down the road. I checked. And, indeed, that is the fact.
Historically, reverse stock splits tend to be followed by dilutions, after a delay.
If TLRY dilutes again, it's likely already planned.
@zilliqa_meta Zilliqa dev't, by a small core team, continues in earnest from what can be seen on GH. One of the few honest OG projects in this space that seem have a chance, imo. If you want to support the work, in your self-interest, do the bare bone minimum due diligence before you post?
@HowToAI_ Which is not to say that LLMs will not benefit from the evolution of their connectomes (creating and updating internal renditions of the physical world).
@HowToAI_ Observing the dude speak for a few moments tells me enough to know I'm watching egotistic little man on a quest for vanity tag rather than advancements from insights & deep understanding. Influential charlatan saying it is this way because I bet my lock, stock, and barrel on it.
@pukiman6 The chapter is as old as Zilliqa. "Investment" fraud by people who have done it before.
3rd draft of one & the same, tried & true swindle script. Just as it did under its former monikers MetaMinds & Metapolis, VersAI brings buzzword P&D flush parting the fools from their cash.
@Thridar1 In case "New Age Industrialist" wasn't red enough large enough a flag.
Not to mention as a sound bite preamble to "Luxury & Financial Services".
I mean, things do not get cringier than that.
Have you not learned your lessons here?
Really?
@Thridar1 Exhibit AAA of "pathetic".
Have you not noticed that actual producers do not brag about air castles?
That talking heads relying on extravagant visions and grandiloquent language in their speeches eventually nearly always come out as full of, well, hot gases (rich in hydrogen)?
@0xMovez Same applies in a fifty-fifty odds set up (the one in that post NNT ridiculed), of course:
1:1 to win $1 & lose $1
is not the same as:
1:1 to win $1.1 & lose $1
@0xMovez The example NNT uses while explaining his Kelly's mod is a different situation from the example used in the post he then ridicules at the end:
7:3 to win $1 & lose $1
is NOT the same as:
7:3 to win $1.1 & lose $1
(NNT's academic disingenuousness in his ego wars on display)
❌ Arizona's new proposed crypto bill does not include $EGLD.
Claim to the contrary is a lie.
The Engrossed (= current version to be voted on) AZ SB1649 is NOT on a Romanian website, y'all #MultiversX MultiFools😂.
It IS here: https://t.co/r5Q3exwqgo (for your study pleasure).
@xCataleya_1 Correction here: the link, at this moment, points to the Introduced version, not a version incorporating the latest updates.
All lawmaking should be versioned in a github-like system making obfuscation of the current state vs. the multitudinous proposed changes impossible.
Correction: Arizona's proposed crypto bill may include $EGLD after all. I can't tell now. Lawmaking version control is out of control, extremely poorly documented, extremely confusing, extremely laborious to navigate for non-"experts", for public.
https://t.co/Sx2FG5stUI
@xCataleya_1 But it turns out now that I am digging into it a bit more that legiscan's folding of AZ SB1649 amendments into the "Latest bill text" may be erroenous.
@xCataleya_1 The bill is going through wildly convoluted changes including "strike everything", likely causing the error(?) on legiscan, that are not documented well, certainly not on azleg.