Stuart Allum

medicine, genetic engineering, business and mild curiosity.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@IainDale @MarinaPurkiss Or...maybe...
https://t.co/V3Pb0uUKnr

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@TerraOrBust So why do you think so many hardcore brexiters don't like this brexit win?

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@SuellaBraverman Who do you hate brown people so much?

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@LoftusSteve Why do so many Brextremists and not know what they are talking about then?
https://t.co/nrIJlYwjd5

[Alex Phillips @ThatAlexWoman]

I love India. I used to live in India. I want to trade with India.

But what should have been a massive 'win' has been marred by the fact that NI exemption for Indian workers, when British employees see the same tax hiked, means it will be far cheaper to hire foreign staff than provide jobs to our own

And that is just plain wrong. In fact, it's a disgrace.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@RJTMorrissey Quite right, Angles and Saxons should go back to where they came from...Britannia for the Britons.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@KingBobIIV You voted for Brexit.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@KiszelyPhilip You seem a bit thick.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@DPJHodges Are you really that dumb? Even the IEA have done more research than you.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@RupertMyers I hope you are better than this at your actual job.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@NickBuckleyMBE Even Brexit economists think you are silly.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@admcollingwood This Brexit economist can help you.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@cheesedoff3 This is a brexit win.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@ThatAlexWoman Oops.
https://t.co/0KKHfeW0U4

[Julian Jessop @julianHjessop]

I think it would be better to wait for the full details of the UK-India trade deal including a proper impact assessment before leaping to judgement, but here goes anyway...

At first sight this deal looks like a win-win, including the agreement to exempt Indian workers from social security contributions in the UK (and vice versa).

This appears to be a standard agreement to avoid double taxation for people working here temporarily, just like we already have with many other countries.

Without it, Indian workers and their employers in the UK have to pay social security contributions in both the UK and India, even though they are not eligible for all the benefits (especially the state pension) that National Insurance gets you.

What's more, the worker/employer will still have to pay Indian social security contributions, which are similar to those in the UK, as well as other additional costs including visa/sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.

So this deal alone will not allow Indian workers to 'undercut' British ones, especially as visa numbers will still be limited. Instead, it creates a level playing field between the two, which is surely a good thing?

I stand ready to be corrected, but does anyone think I'm wrong on this? 🤔

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@Fox_Claire @afneil Maybe the same ones who fell for this.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@zaelefty @BarryNL @Femi_Sorry You seem to have fallen into the trap of conflation yourself.
You differentiate woman (gender) and female (sex). But you then say, "masculine girls are still girls", instead of "masculine girls are still female".

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@nickdixoncomic Parody account.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@lordmiles Don't be silly, he's not a Catholic.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@GoldingBF Do you not like Middle Eastern religions then?

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@matthewdmarsden I don't think the majority right wing UK media are your problem.
Your god people help enough...
https://t.co/flbIqqlHUm

[Toria Brooke @realtoriabrooke]

ICYMI — President @realDonaldTrump alludes to "something being wrong" in the United States due to sprays in the air that "other countries do not use," also known as chem trails.

[Stuart Allum @stallum20]

@benleo Do their nazi salutes give you goose-steps too?