@MaryFernando_ I haven’t had a positive Covid test among my patients in weeks and am vaccinated with two boosters which I generally trust to avoid most infections and spread. I’ll mask up for a coughing patient but otherwise it stays on the desk. I encourage my patients to get vaxed
@mrnigeldsouza From a population level it is easier to just mail FITs to everyone but I'm not convinced that is the best outcome for patients if we are not also offering colonoscopy which is still the gold standard
@mrnigeldsouza I've seen many limitations with the study starting with the title but also the polyp detection rate of the practitioners and the patient participation rate in colonoscopy. When I recommend a scope I don't do it in a letter, I do it face to face.
@GI_Pearls@tberzin@ckjellmo@ebtapper Okay, sure, all of those scores indicate an inadequate prep and scope should be repeated within a year. As a practitioner though I am going to look sideways a lot more at a patient with rectal bleeding with a recent scope and a BPPS score of 5 than a score of 9
@tberzin@GI_Pearls@ckjellmo@ebtapper But how do you define adequate? The score gives you criteria to determine if you really were adequate. You’re probably basically doing it in your head anyway when you dictate “adequate” so might as well say it out loud instead of making everyone wonder what you meant
@GI_Pearls@ckjellmo@ebtapper My bowel preps are usually 3-3-3 and I don’t say 3-3-3 I say “Boston Bowel prep of 9”. If it’s not a nine I indicate which area was suboptimal. As long as you can clear the wall with irrigation, there’s no reason not to give a section a 3