Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) for Qwen on LLaMA.cpp!
+40% performance! 90% acceptance rate. Running locally on a MacBook Pro M5 Max 64GB
We patched LLaMA.cpp, quantized Qwen 3.6 27B into GGUF format with TurboQuant and shipped MTP drafts on top. Benchmark, Source code & models👇
Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) for LLaMA.cpp!
Running Gemma4 local model 1.5x faster.
We patched LLaMA.cpp. Quantized Gemma 4 assistant models into GGUF format. We ran tests on a MacBook Pro M5Max. Gemma 26B with MTP drafts tokens 40% faster. Benchmarks, source code and models 👇
Private AI browser with the OpenClaw agent on free local models
Run your agent on Qwen, Gemma, or Nemotron directly in the browser
Open source. Private. Runs on your local device
Deepseek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5 in a gamedev contest (full prompt is below)🏎️
Cost:
Deepseek V4 Pro: $0.07656
GPT-5.5: $0.33063
Output stats:
Deepseek: 34 tok/s · 9m 5s · 18,869 tokens
GPT-5.5: 25 tok/s · 7m 5s · 10,580 tokens
Conclusion: GPT-5.5 clearly made the better karting game. Deepseek V4 Pro was 4.3x cheaper and generated almost 2x more tokens, but the final result was weaker. It struggled with graphics, visual polish, and creative direction, while GPT-5.5 delivered better game quality, better visuals, more creativity, and stronger overall execution. Even though Deepseek positions itself as a strong model for coding, in this gamedev test it still felt far behind GPT-5.5.
Try the same karting prompt with another AI model and share your result below.
Compared Qwen3.6 35B and 27B in the same conditions with Google TurboQuant
Device: MacBook Pro M5Max 64GB RAM
Outputs characteristics:
Qwen3.6 35B: 6672 tokens, 2m 10s, 65 tok/s
Qwen3.6 27B: 7344 tokens, 5m 22s, 24 tok/s
Conclusion: Both models were asked to draw waves using HTML, 35B responded quickly but the result feels weak and messy, while 27B took more time and delivered a much cleaner and more consistent result, because it is built for thinking and planning, so it works better on tasks that need structure, overall 27B is a better choice for tasks where planning matters, while 35B is more suitable for everyday use when you just need a fast response
Minimax week on AI/ML API:
- Music-2.6 is free
- Video & TTS models 30% off
- LLMs 10% off
If you haven't tried @MiniMax_AI yet - now is the best time.
GLM 5.1 is now LIVE in Atomic Chat
SOTA for code & chat – now runs locally with TurboQuant
Thanks to @zai_org for open-sourcing this frontier model
Newly released ✧ Gemma 4 is live on AI/ML API.
We ran a benchmark test to showcase model capabilities on a complex analysis task, delivering stunning gains in speed, cost, and quality.
RT + comment to win $100 API tokens - 50 random winners!
Google Turbo Quant running Locally in Atomic Chat
MacBook Air M4 16 GB
Model: QWEN3.5-9B
Context window: 50000
Summarising 20000 words in just seconds..
You can do 3x larger context window, processing 3x faster than before!
Now your AI agent can turn your idea into a video in ONE chat
We just shipped Image To Video inside Sigma Browser 🎬
Write a prompt, the AI generates an image, click Animate Photo – and it comes to life
No animation prompts, no extra tools
The whole thing happens in the same chat where you had the idea
Try it – https://t.co/KQSV5ecVr1
Uncensored AI. Running locally. Inside your browser.
In Sigma you can chat with your own local LLM directly in the browser.
The model runs entirely on the user's machine and is fully open-source. No external APIs, no cloud processing - all interactions stay local.
Both censored and uncensored versions are available.
Try it out now
https://t.co/ZBCxveJt0j