This was the Chief Law Officer of Nigeria for the entirety of General Buhari’s tenure in office. A veritable poster boy for the perversions that overtakes men, who are charged with pretending to enforce laws, in a country that is ruled by IMPUNITY..🇳🇬🤔
There is a silent political civil war going on in the Obidient camp. The realization that it is not a political movement but a hate, vitriol and unpatriotic movement. They hate the country they want to govern, you only need to hear them discrediting Nigeria, Nigerians and Nigerian leaders. Their members are beginning to see through the lenses. They are abandoning the so-called movement. Gbajue Gbajue Gbajue
@ruffydfire The truth of all this is that most of them are APC supporters who came all the way from Nigeria to welcome the president
Most of them are the city boy or relax tinubu is fixing Nigeria that I can tell u
Just along the High Street here in Windsor, you can hear Nigerian supporters chanting ‘On your mandate we shall stand’ a slogan that’s become closely associated with his political base back home. moments after President Bola Tinubu passes through.
I bought fuel just now in the state of Qatar where missiles are been fired morning, afternoon and night it has never added penny but in Nigeria my country where nothing concern them with the war fuel is gold and diamond
Shame to Nigeria lazy people
PRESS STATEMENT
In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight.
When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies.
I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me.
Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me.
I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day.
As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know.
The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki”
I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative.
I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far.
Stay tuned.
– D.H Bwala
Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication
(State House)
Saturday March 7, 2026
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, has confirmed that Nigerian soldiers aboard a military aircraft that made a forced landing in Burkina Faso are still in the West African country.
Tuggar spoke on Thursday at the ECOWAS Commission in Abuja during a joint press briefing with his Beninese counterpart, Olushegun Bakari.
PUBLIC BRIEFING
ISSUED BY: NJOKU JUDE NJOKU, ESQ.
FOR THE MAZI NNAMDI KANU GLOBAL DEFENCE CONSORTIUM
DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER 2025.
OMOTOSHO’S JUDGMENT IS A LEGAL IMPOSSIBILITY:
CONVICTION UNDER A REPEALED LAW CANNOT STAND
DATE: 22/11/2025
The Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Defence Consortium wishes to inform the Nigerian public, the Bar, and the international community that the 20 November 2025 judgment delivered by Hon. Justice James Omotosho in FRN v. Nnamdi Kanu is unsustainable in law, untenable under the Constitution, and void for want of jurisdiction.
This is not rhetoric. It is a matter of black-letter law, constitutional command, and non-negotiable legal principle.
1. THE COURT CONVICTED UNDER A LAW THAT NO LONGER EXISTS
By Section 104 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, the Terrorism (Prevention) (Amendment) Act 2013 - the very statute Justice Omotosho relied upon was fully repealed.
A repealed law is a dead law.
A court cannot revive it.
A conviction cannot stand on it.
Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution is emphatic:
No person shall be convicted unless the offence is defined and the penalty prescribed in a written law.
“Written law” means a law in force on the day of conviction.
On 20 November 2025, the 2013 Act was not in force.
It is legally impossible to convict anyone under it.
This alone renders the judgment a nullity.
2. SAVINGS CLAUSES CANNOT RESURRECT A REPEALED CRIMINAL STATUTE
The Prosecution unsuccessfully attempted to rely on a “savings clause” in the 2022 Act.
But Nigerian law is clear:
Savings clauses preserve pending matters.
They do not create new proceedings.
They do not override the Constitution.
They do not resurrect repealed laws.
After the Court of Appeal’s 13 October 2022 discharge, there was no “pending” proceeding to save.
What followed in 2023 was a new trial, which cannot be rooted in a repealed law.
The attempt to use a transitional clause as a resurrection tool is legally impermissible.
3. THE EXTANT 2022 TERRORISM ACT NARROWS TERRORISM AND EXCLUDES NON-VIOLENT POLITICAL EXPRESSION
The TPPA 2022—the only governing statute—materially changes Nigerian terrorism law:
Terrorism now requires conduct involving violence or grievous harm.
Non-violent protest, advocacy, dissent, and political agitation are expressly excluded.
The allegations against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu relate to speeches, broadcasts, and political advocacy.
These do not meet the definition of terrorism under the 2022 Act.
The Constitution (Section 36(8)) also requires courts to apply the lighter or more favourable law—in this case, the TPPA 2022.
The trial court failed to do so.
4. THE RESULT: A JUDGMENT THAT COLLAPSES UNDER ITS OWN CONTRADICTIONS
By convicting under a repealed law, ignoring the controlling statute, and applying a harsher non-existent regime, the judgment:
violates Section 1(3) (Supremacy of the Constitution),
breaches Section 36(8), 36(9), 36(12),
lacks jurisdiction, and
is incapable of withstanding appellate review.
These are not technicalities.
They go to the foundation of the criminal justice system.
5. THE DEFENCE POSITION
We state categorically:
This judgment will not survive appellate scrutiny.
A Notice of Appeal will be filed filed.
The grounds are rooted firmly in:
constitutional supremacy,
statutory repeal,
the doctrine of nullity, and
the mandatory application of the extant 2022 Act.
The Consortium remains confident that the Court of Appeal will restore legality, uphold constitutional norms, and vacate this defective conviction.
Signed:
Njoku Jude Njoku, Esq.
For the Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Global Defence Consortium.
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow
We r yet to recover kebbi girls and we have
Over 100 school children kidnaped last night at St. Mary Private Primary and Secondary School in Agwara LG of Niger State.