Well, apparently the NFL has decided that pass interference isn't actually a thing by their definition unless the zebras decide that it is - makes it kinda hard to have an objective standard to go by.
@johnmarto2@Inthevortex717@cnnbrk no it's concurrent - meaning it doesn't extend him past the 30 he had already.
Sentencing can be concurrent (same time) or consecutive (one after the other), and this judge decided it should be the former.
@decolonialatlas While technically true, the % who actually would be able to SEE any of this light at that moment is more like ~97% - light on the outermost edges (in astronomical twilight) is so dim that photons are nearly impossible for the naked eye to detect.
Source: https://t.co/X93MoENZDZ
@Lumas202@SmolaDS Ok, based upon what everyone else is replying with, either this is some kind of joke that I'm clearly missing some amount of context for...or I'm just really, really stupid.
I suppose this could also be an "and/or" situation..
@DeltaRose613@cnnbrk For real man, how anyone could logically conclude that CNN would fire one of their highest rated anchors over him just supporting his brother is beyond me - but of course, all these armchair experts who couldn't even have been bothered to read the article just know everything 🙄
@cnnbrk People aren't aware that it's not just a situation of a brother just helping family (and CNN is not helping their case by barely mentioning the facts).
His actions demonstrated a complete disregard for journalistic integrity. That is the ACTUAL reason he was fired.
@SWeapon2 @myphototrail @cnnbrk@CNN What the hell does follower count have to do with anything here?
Come ask me how you can tell everybody that you know absolutely nothing about a situation, without actually saying you know nothing about the situation.
Earning #CloudClubCash at #CentralVapors !!!
Had a great experience with these guys who gave me a hell of a deal on a new kit & threw in free shipping too! Check em out!
https://t.co/Z0dDf7WWVr
Considering my profile picture was from 2008 & that my last *actual* tweet was from 2013, I figured it might be a good idea to at least do the "once a decade" update.
@BitchWithA_W @HJHaldanePhD @fireinwomb My understanding is its ONLY the meeting host that could access the chat transcripts if they so chose to - private msgs between attendees would NOT be included.
That makes sense as that private convo may be relevant to topic, but the sender wanted anonymity during the meeting.
@Hunter4213Lmao @GlassesLives @thepennyhoarder Ah, yes - those good old days, before your generation fucked the rest of us over in the name of greed & all-around just not giving a fuck 🙄
Yes, I remember the times well.