PATRICK SOON-SHIONG:
“We have in our body a gene called p53 that actually prevents cancer from occurring.”
“Guess what COVID does? It knocks down p53.”
Were we all deliberately poisoned?
“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”
— Matthew 18:6
Inflation during Trump's 1st year declined to 2.4% from the significantly faster rates under Biden, but still not down to the 2.0% target let alone the 1.8% average from before Biden:
Fractional reserve banking = your money isn’t really there. And when it collapses? YOU bail it out through inflation and taxes.
Balance the budget. End the bailouts. Audit the Fed.
One of the world’s top cancer researchers just dropped a bombshell most oncologists don’t want you to hear:
Dr. Thomas Seyfried (MIT-trained professor who’s published 200+ peer-reviewed papers) says the century-old habit of immediately biopsying tumors could actually be spreading the disease in some cases.
In this explosive 2:36 clip, he explains:
• Why “Stage 1–4” grading is based on how scary the tumor looks under a microscope AFTER you’ve already poked it
• How dozens of published studies show needle biopsies (breast, colon, liver, lung) can seed cancer cells along the needle track
• His radical but logical alternative: “Don’t poke the bear. Starve it first with metabolic therapy until it’s weak and docile, then remove the entire shrunken tumor in one clean surgery.”
• After that, use non-invasive PET/CT/MRI to confirm it’s gone — no risky needle required.
His exact quote: “We already beat it down… if you stab it early you’ll call it aggressive. If you shrink it first, the pathologist says ‘this isn’t even dangerous.’ Same tumor, totally different story.”
This isn’t fringe — it’s published biology being ignored by standard protocols.
Watch the full 2:36 clip and decide for yourself if the current “diagnose → biopsy → treat” sequence is backwards.
Do you think patients should at least be told this approach exists before deciding on a biopsy? Let me know in the comments.
Meet Lexi Kuenzle.
She’s one of the good ones.
Yesterday, in front of a nurses station — with 8 (eight) nurses & a PATIENT —
Dr. Matthew Jung said in front of everyone,
“I hate Charlie Kirk. He had it coming. He deserved it.”
Lexi, a registered nurse, was the ONLY one that spoke up: “You’re a doctor. How could you say someone deserved to die.”
Lexi said you could hear a pin drop & no one said anything, including the patient.
She reported the incident to management & — after she got home — posted about it & Dr. Matthew Jung on her private Instagram.
She received an email from her union representative saying that she needs to look for another job.
Lexi was also pulled into a meeting & is suspended without pay indefinitely pending an investigation.
Meanwhile, there’s no information on whether or not Dr. Matthew Jung is being reprimanded.
Lexi has filed a lawsuit.
I interviewed her over the phone & she said,
“I was deeply saddened over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. It was devastating to hear of the killing of an innocent father and I thought everyone would agree — especially a doctor whose purpose is to save lives.
In a time where personal social ideologies are often celebrated, especially if they align with popular progressive topics, I simply aimed to stand up for what is right. They tried to shut me up, but they’re not going to.”
Lexi hopes you will share her story & that’s why I’m sharing it with you.
The fact also remains that Dr. Matthew Jung should be held accountable for saying “Charlie deserved it” in front of a nurses station & a PATIENT.
What if the patient disagrees? Would Dr. Matthew Jung treat them? Would he treat them differently? Would he allow his emotions to cloud his judgement, as he did by saying such a statement in front of a patient?
This happened at Englewood Hospital in New Jersey.
📍Englewood, NJ
One of Charlie’s Angels: @lexikuenzle
Before tonight's game we held a moment of silence in memoriam of Charlie Kirk.
Kirk founded the youth activist group “Turning Point USA” and had become a fixture on college campuses. Charlie Kirk, a husband and father of two children, was 31 years old.
@mandytaheri@Newsweek Great meeting you outside Bannon's house. Susan and I enjoyed talking with you in the cold sleet! Wish we could have come in with you as your assistants! Great article!
NEW: US Border Patrol RUNS OVER alleged Mexican Cartel members as they’re smuggling illegal migrants over our border wall
This was filmed on the San Diego, California section of the border. This new method seems very effective!!