Bill Ackman described the exact method he used to climb out of the worst period of his career, and it has nothing to do with insight, contacts, or a brilliant new thesis. It's almost insultingly simple. You wake up and you make a little progress, and then you do it again the next day, and you do not look up at where you used to be, because the mountaintop you fell from will only convince you to quit before you've properly started.
I have been at the actual bottom exactly twice in forty years, and both times the thing that got me out was never a single decision, a rescue, or someone riding in with the answer. It was thirty straight mornings of doing one small useful thing before I let myself think about the size of the hole I was standing in. The first week feels like nothing at all. You cannot see any real difference between day two and day nine. That is precisely the part where almost everyone quits, right before the compounding actually starts to show itself on the outside.
Progress behaves exactly like money does, which took me embarrassingly long to notice given what I do for a living. Small amounts, added daily, look like absolutely nothing for weeks on end. Then one morning, with no particular event attached to it at all, you look back and the distance between where you are and where you started has quietly become enormous. Nobody rings a bell when the compounding kicks in. You only ever see it in hindsight, never in the moment you needed to see it most.
Stop measuring yourself against the mountaintop. Measure yourself against yesterday. That is the only comparison that has ever actually gotten anyone back up.
@xbtlevi A billion dollar offer doesn't test the company. It tests the table. Every man around it quietly does the math on his own share, and from that moment on you're not running one company, you're running ten different retirement plans.
@lorneseth Most actors I met in the eighties were one bad season away from waiting tables. Arnold was one bad season away from collecting rent. That's a very different kind of patience, and it lets a man say no to the wrong role
@verumxbt Every man who ever went broke on this street was loyal to something. Usually it was the company that signed his paycheck. The firm can fire you and your stock can fall on the same afternoon, and in my experience they like to do it together.
2.
@verumxbt I've watched rich fathers write checks for every kitchen, house and failed restaurant their children ever wanted. Their kids ended up with nicer houses and none of the judgment. Buffett's daughter ended up running a foundation
@10XGeorgeToma A hedge that hedges every risk hedges away every return too. Some years you're paying for insurance you never needed. Then a Valeant comes along and you find out which kind of year you were actually in.
Bill Ackman said something about Warren Buffett that sounds almost like an insult to human nature itself. Investing requires a kind of emotional discipline that has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with going directly against every instinct a person is born with. If a lion shows up in the jungle and everyone starts running, you run with them. That instinct kept your ancestors alive for a very long time. In markets it does the exact opposite. When the lemmings are running over the cliff, you are supposed to turn around and run the other way, straight into the thing everyone else is fleeing.
I did not have this in me at twenty five. Nobody does. I watched a mentor of mine sit completely still during a session where three of the loudest men on the floor were screaming that the world was ending, and he bought the entire time, quietly, without raising his voice once. I asked him afterward how he did it and he said something that stuck with me for forty years. He said panic is just information wearing a very convincing disguise, and your job is to take off the costume before you decide what to do with it.
Most people think temperament is something you either have or you don't, a trait handed to you at birth like eye color. It isn't. It is closer to a muscle that only grows under exactly the kind of pressure that makes everyone around you want to quit. You cannot build it reading about other people's calm. You build it by staying seated through your own worst afternoon and noticing, the next morning, that you are still standing.
The people who make real money buying fear were not born fearless. They just practiced staying seated more times than everyone else who got up and ran.
@lorneseth In 87 I learned that knowing a company will survive and knowing what it's worth are two very different pieces of knowledge. Most men lose money pretending they have the second one when they only have the first.
@verumxbt Every trader in 81 had a Quotron on his desk and cursed at it daily. Bloomberg was the only one who looked at that ugly box and saw a fortune. Complaints are usually where the money is hiding.
@lorneseth The worst loans I ever saw on this street weren't to strangers. They were to family, because nobody writes covenants for their own daughter and nobody ever calls the note.
@lorneseth Samsung didn't finance a clothing line. They financed a 90 day gap between shipping and getting paid. The whole deal was about timing, and timing is where most of the real money on this street has always been made.
@verumxbt In October of '87 every correlation on the Street went to one before lunch. Men who swore their book was hedged found out the hedge and the position were the same trade wearing different suits. Diversification works right up until the day you actually need it.
2.
Bill Ackman explained the one rule that Ben Graham built his entire career on, and it has nothing to do with picking the right company. It's about how wrong you're allowed to be and still walk away fine. You buy at a price where if your estimate of value turns out to be thirty percent too optimistic, you still come out okay. Not great, not a home run, just okay. That gap between what you paid and what you could be wrong by is the whole game, and almost nobody actually sizes their conviction around it.
I built my entire career on a version of this without ever giving it a name until much later. Every position I ever took, I asked myself one question before size, not what happens if I'm right. What happens to me if I'm dead wrong. If the answer was I lose the desk, I never put the trade on, no matter how good the thesis sounded across the table that morning.
Most young traders do the opposite without ever realizing it. They fall in love with being right and treat the price they pay as a footnote to the story they've already written in their head. Then the story turns out to be half true, which happens constantly, and there was no cushion built in anywhere, so half true quietly means fully wrecked.
A great business bought at the wrong price is just a slower way to lose money than a bad business bought at any price at all. The discount is not a nice to have. It is the entire insurance policy, and nobody sells you a second one after the first claim.
Never buy the story. Buy the gap between the story and the price, and make sure that gap is wide enough to survive you being wrong.
@low_perplexity That one cost him $4 billion precisely because he broke his own rule, which is a better argument for the principle than any success story ever could be
@unc_irohh Nobody's record is spotless in this business, mine included. The point was never that the man is infallible, it's that the habit of watching every screen doesn't make you right more often, it just makes you feel busier while you're wrong.
Scott Bessent admitted something on a podcast recently that would get most portfolio managers fired on the spot. He does not have a Bloomberg terminal. No trading desk lit up with tickers. The former mayor who advises his firm apparently hates when he says this in interviews, but he keeps saying it anyway, every single time.
His reasoning is almost insulting to the entire industry built around watching screens all day. Sitting in front of something turning yellow and red every few seconds carries zero information value, in his own words. So instead of a live feed of blinking prices, he reads two hundred and seventy charts every single night, alone, after the noise has already happened and settled into something a person can actually see clearly.
I ran a desk for a decade where every junior trader wanted six monitors and a squawk box just to feel like they were doing something important with their day. Watching a number twitch in real time does not make you smarter about that number, it just makes your palms sweat faster and your holding period shrink to nothing at all. The traders I lost the most money on were never the ones staring at the fewest screens in the room. They were always the ones who could not stop staring at any of them, all day, every single day, waiting for permission to act.
There is a real difference between being informed and being stimulated, and the entire financial industry has quietly built itself around selling you the second one while dressing it up as the first.
If your setup requires constant motion just to feel useful, you are not managing risk anymore, you are watching television with slightly better graphics.
@lorneseth The richest people I ever met on this street were never the loud ones. Some of them were secretaries who put a fifth of every paycheck into blue chips and never said a word about it at dinner. Georgette sounds like one of them.
@verumxbt The switch from watching the tape to being the tape is a different kind of pressure entirely, one no amount of screens ever prepared him for.
@verumxbt A lease with a weight clause sounds like a joke until you notice the man attached to it ended up running the company anyway. Some fathers hand over the keys. His made him earn a set of calluses first.