@Dr_Crossroads I imagine oil plummeting removes rate hikes as a potential headwind for these names. Also-as you mentioned, they’ve had a rough first half of the year and in many cases were oversold
“Monsters.” “Dark money.” A hidden hand “turning us against one another.”
Swap “AIPAC” for “Jews” and it’s the oldest antisemitic conspiracy theory in the books. That’s not criticizing a lobby. That’s laundering antisemitism from your podium as Mayor of a city with more than a million Jews. This bullshit is dangerous.
If you want to talk about real monsters let’s start with the North Koreans, Russians, Sudanese, the Iranian regime, and their proxies — Hamas, Hezbollah, PIJ — and other terrorist groups who’ve killed scores of Americans.
Yes, I can.
Israel is justified morally and legally to invade Lebanon because of hezbollah’s attacks from the southern part of the country. Their presence in southern Lebanon directly contradicts Resolution 1701, which called for Hezbollah’s attacks to end and for the area south of the Litani to be free of unauthorized armed forces. This was 20 years ago and nothing has changed.
This stems all the way back to the PLO in the 1970’s after Black September when they were kicked out of Jordan, so they “invaded” Lebanon and turned it into a terror launch pad.
Israel fought the PLO then, and now Hezbollah. Somehow, to you people, armed groups can turn Lebanon into a launchpad for attacks and never be called “invaders,” but the country responding to those attacks always is.
As for the soldiers who were killed inside Lebanon: yes, Israeli troops engaged in combat are lawful military targets. Nobody serious disputes that. But Israel responding militarily after Hezbollah kills its soldiers is not “complaining.” That is what nations at war do.
What kind of retarded question is this? Every country responds to its troops and service members being killed in conflict.
Sovereignty cannot be invoked only after you have allowed an independent militia to use your territory as a launchpad for terror.
Hope this helps.
Vance spent the last 2 days running around repeatedly claiming that the regime wouldn’t get sanction relief if they continued to sponsor terror proxies (despite that being nowhere in the MoU text).
All while the regime publicly says they will use the money from the deal in the same exact way they’ve always used it.
@KennyZufall@growthrapidly Nebius, if they execute what the team has planned, would likely be a $600 stock in the not too distant future. Immensely talented team and CEO. I know it’s run hot-I have a position where I didn’t add enough under $100. I’m slowly adding to my position now on any pullbacks
According to President Trump's new standard, if al-Qaeda or Iran were to target Washington with "only" a few drones or missiles, and nobody was killed or injured, America should stand down and sign a deal with the aggressor. That approach will not bring peace to the region, including Lebanon and Israel. It risks teaching every side the same lesson: rearm, regroup, and prepare for the next round. A pause is not peace if everyone is simply loading more weapons for tomorrow.
5% of $1 trillion is $50 billion.
there are 19.3 million US college students right now.
$50bn/19.3 million = $2,591 per student currently in school.
average college tuition is $38,270
so, that would pay for 7% of 1 year, about 2 weeks of education for just those already in school.
it's a sad day when even the kleptocrats are mathematically illiterate...
@KennyZufall Would love it if Noto or another insider saw this and decided to just screw over the MMs with a huge buy, would at least discourage this behavior somewhat 😆
There's something psychotic about those who produce nothing of value for society but wait around for others to create jobs and wealth for millions of people, only to try to immediately steal it all.