KIPTORMOI

Land economist,Realty & Caverna service's

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

The network

[Ahmednasir Abdullahi SC @ahmednasirlaw]

Go and check the games THEY play in our courts...especially at the Environment & Land Courts in Mombasa, Diani and The Supreme Court. See, the crazy judgments THEY get. Then go check the games THEY play in the NATIONAL LAND COMMISSION and the billions THEY are paid even for land belonging to third parties. You will then realise the fuel scam is a child's play. THEY OWN KENYA AND RUN IT...THEY play better than JOHN GOTTI and CHARLES "LUCKY" LUCIANO.

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

This environmental dogs will see fire 🔥 this time we are very much ready for their stupidity,let them go plant trees at chalbi desert first

[Moe @moneyacademyKE]

Environmental groups say Dangote’s Sh2.2 trillion Lamu refinery plan risks damaging Lamu’s fragile ecosystem, threatening mangroves, coral reefs and fishing livelihoods.

They also warn it could become a stranded asset as the world moves toward cleaner energy

[Moe @moneyacademyKE]

Environmental groups say Dangote’s Sh2.2 trillion Lamu refinery plan risks damaging Lamu’s fragile ecosystem, threatening mangroves, coral reefs and fishing livelihoods.

They also warn it could become a stranded asset as the world moves toward cleaner energy

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@taylormose35 @moneyacademyKE LAPSET project addressed that issue you idiot

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@moneyacademyKE Environmental activists should be aware that we will unleashe "mambo ni matatu" on them by the citizens themselves safari stupid litigants should be prepared to face the wrath of Kenyans TUMECHOKA NA UJINGA last time it was about a coal power project in LAMU COUNTY

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@moneyacademyKE Is it their money being used for the infrastructure

[MUHAMMAD ONYANGO @Moha001_Onyango]

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

12GB | 256GB Storage

Brand new with 24-months warranty

Kshs 127,000

☎️ 0722 300 252

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@cathy_mutuku Kila mutu anajua kile kilimleta taon

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@Endo254 @amerix By lowering cost of diesel, making it available and creating massive jobs in refining and transportation

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@J_Mbundu @amerix Our changamwe is 6000barrel per day versus 700,000 barrel's per day you idiot good for nothing who went to school by selling other cow to be another cow himself

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@calvin_ngano @1blessingsmokie @Mkenya005 @amerix Give an example.....or else you want Kenya to protect itself like Ethiopia?

[Eric @amerix]

Protect Dangote with his investments at all costs. Kenya must move forward. Kenyans are poorer because they are consuming more than they can manufacture. Kenya needs more factories, more industries and more production, not court orders.

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@GathogoBMwangi Fanya ile yako ya pig's yeye anafanya yake to showcase ile lami ameweka hio upande ya wakamba 😆😆

[Fck Around N Find Out @FAFO_TV]

Bro needs a whole new identity after this 💀

[Ahmednasir Abdullahi SC @ahmednasirlaw]

Dangote ALWAYS wanted to invest in Kenya BIG TIME. But the boys and men who called the shots in Kibaki's and Uhuru's State House wanted crazy equity as kickbacks. Dangote will not put his billions in your country and bribe the thieves in power too. That is why it's commendable that H.E @WilliamsRuto opened the investment door to Dangote and allowed him to put his dollars in Kenya on HIS TERMS.

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@Kibet_bull Until you become a president you will never understand

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

The kids wanted to prank their dad, and he did exactly what they wished for.

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

Correct definition of capitalism as intertwined with common law

[Sizwe SikaMusi @SizweLo]

People defend capitalism because they confuse it with commerce. They believe “capitalism” is when people start businesses and sell things.

If people understood that the thing they call capitalism and love so much is actually just commerce and that it’s not the same thing as capitalism, they would feel very different.

This is because a local baker selling bread, a mechanic fixing cars, or an artisan selling wares on a digital storefront is a sign of commerce in a market economy, which is simply a mechanism for exchanging goods and services based on supply and demand.

Needless to say, this has existed for thousands of years before capitalism was created.

As economic historian Fernand Braudel pointed out, commerce and capitalism are not only distinct; but historically, they have often operated at cross-purposes.

According to Braudel, ordinary commerce is competitive and transparent, while capitalism is anti-competitive and deliberately opaque, making it a zone of privilege held by a small elite who bend the rules in their favour.

Braudel further argues that commerce, or the market, is horizontal, transparent, and competitive and as old as civilization itself. It involves individuals or small groups trading goods, where barriers to entry are low, no single player dominates, and profit is a reward for fulfilling a specific need.

Capitalism, meanwhile, is a specific institutional arrangement that emerged relatively recently in human history, around the 16th to 17th centuries. It is NOT just people “trading stuff”. It is instead the legal and financial system where the means of production are privately owned, and the primary objective is the continuous, infinite accumulation of capital.

Because of this accumulation-obssessed nature of capitalism, when it scales up, it seeks to eliminate the free play of commerce to protect its investments. True market competition is risky for massive capital as it drives prices down and threatens profit margins.

Braudel contended that capitalism only begins where commerce ends. It is the zone of high finance and state collusion. Because it operates across vast distances such as the 17th-century spice trade, information takes months to travel, which creates a deliberate lack of transparency.

Braudel noted that the great capitalists of the early modern era in Madeira and Venice or the Dutch East India Company, never wanted to compete in a fair, transparent market because competition slices profit margins to the bone. Instead, they secured royal charters, exclusive trading rights, and naval protection. At the same time, the state granted them legal monopolies, effectively outlawing competition.

Therefore, capitalism naturally trends toward creating monopolies and securing state interventions like bailouts, subsidies, and regulatory capture to shield itself from the very market forces it claims to champion. In fact, the most important takeaway from Braudel’s analysis is that capitalism is NOT the natural evolution or the highest form of the free market, it is its dark shadow.

So, when our lizard overlords use “free market” and “capitalism” interchangeably, they’re deliberately hiding this distinction and using the moral legitimacy of the hard-working, transparent business owner to defend the structural privileges of the protected financial elite and its regulatory capture.

If ordinary people could comprehend these distinctions, many self-described “capitalists” would realise they are just pro-commerce, and actually anti-capitalist, because it would be clear that defending “capitalism” means defending the right of a small parasite class to bypass the market entirely.

[Sizwe SikaMusi @SizweLo]

People defend capitalism because they confuse it with commerce. They believe “capitalism” is when people start businesses and sell things.

If people understood that the thing they call capitalism and love so much is actually just commerce and that it’s not the same thing as capitalism, they would feel very different.

This is because a local baker selling bread, a mechanic fixing cars, or an artisan selling wares on a digital storefront is a sign of commerce in a market economy, which is simply a mechanism for exchanging goods and services based on supply and demand.

Needless to say, this has existed for thousands of years before capitalism was created.

As economic historian Fernand Braudel pointed out, commerce and capitalism are not only distinct; but historically, they have often operated at cross-purposes.

According to Braudel, ordinary commerce is competitive and transparent, while capitalism is anti-competitive and deliberately opaque, making it a zone of privilege held by a small elite who bend the rules in their favour.

Braudel further argues that commerce, or the market, is horizontal, transparent, and competitive and as old as civilization itself. It involves individuals or small groups trading goods, where barriers to entry are low, no single player dominates, and profit is a reward for fulfilling a specific need.

Capitalism, meanwhile, is a specific institutional arrangement that emerged relatively recently in human history, around the 16th to 17th centuries. It is NOT just people “trading stuff”. It is instead the legal and financial system where the means of production are privately owned, and the primary objective is the continuous, infinite accumulation of capital.

Because of this accumulation-obssessed nature of capitalism, when it scales up, it seeks to eliminate the free play of commerce to protect its investments. True market competition is risky for massive capital as it drives prices down and threatens profit margins.

Braudel contended that capitalism only begins where commerce ends. It is the zone of high finance and state collusion. Because it operates across vast distances such as the 17th-century spice trade, information takes months to travel, which creates a deliberate lack of transparency.

Braudel noted that the great capitalists of the early modern era in Madeira and Venice or the Dutch East India Company, never wanted to compete in a fair, transparent market because competition slices profit margins to the bone. Instead, they secured royal charters, exclusive trading rights, and naval protection. At the same time, the state granted them legal monopolies, effectively outlawing competition.

Therefore, capitalism naturally trends toward creating monopolies and securing state interventions like bailouts, subsidies, and regulatory capture to shield itself from the very market forces it claims to champion. In fact, the most important takeaway from Braudel’s analysis is that capitalism is NOT the natural evolution or the highest form of the free market, it is its dark shadow.

So, when our lizard overlords use “free market” and “capitalism” interchangeably, they’re deliberately hiding this distinction and using the moral legitimacy of the hard-working, transparent business owner to defend the structural privileges of the protected financial elite and its regulatory capture.

If ordinary people could comprehend these distinctions, many self-described “capitalists” would realise they are just pro-commerce, and actually anti-capitalist, because it would be clear that defending “capitalism” means defending the right of a small parasite class to bypass the market entirely.

[MOSET @KeKirwa]

Ukioa from your tribe utasolve 50% of marriage problems. Marrying more than one wife solves the remaining 50%.

[KIPTORMOI @stevensang13]

@ahmednasirlaw "Mambo ni matatu".......... should be enforced hence forth..... I remember the coal power project in LAMU was derailed by the same miscreants masqueradeing as public participant's....."roundi hii watajua kwa mbwa ni nje"