Michelle Stirling

[Around Liverpool @aroundliv]

Someone sent me a post that said this on it about the murder of Liverpool’s Ken Bigley:

“These are the last images of Ken Bigley.
Moments before he knew his head was to be hacked off on camera.

I was sent the video years ago.
Not because of murder porn but as a warning of what will come if we don't stop it.

It changed me as a man.
Mohammed Yaseem took his time.
Smiled at the camera.
He took his time removing Kens head while still conscious.
Thats the idea.
The same as the videos of Jewish women having their breasts cut off and thrown around like a ball as she lays there screaming knowing whats coming next.

They kept him in a cage for hours telling him his inevitable fate.
Unimaginable cruelty.
His crime.... being a westerner.
His killer Mohamed Yaseen

Mohammed Yaseen is also responsible for setting fire to women and girls in cages for not submitting to Islam.

He burned them alive.

Laughing and shouting Allahu Akbar.

God is great

Setting fire to children and women and slowly removing another humans head whilst praising a sky wizard.....

Have a wild guess where he lives now????

Windsor.
Seen shopping in the Co Op

We know he's not working so your paying his rent, utilities and food bill.

Our government won't deport him or lock him up.

Where's the fuckin morality?”

It is truly terrifying what we are allowing our government to do to us.

[Michelle Stirling @stirlingmichell]

No one voted for this...

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Where does the rot come from?

40.8 million more migrants in Europe between 2000 and 2024. +67%. UK +7.1M. Spain +6.8M. Germany +6.4M. France +3M.

Nobody voted for this. No referendum. No manifesto that said "we're going to transform your country in a single generation." And yet it happened everywhere, all at once.

Because the real decisions are no longer made where people vote. They're made in supreme courts that interpret asylum law in only one direction. In European case law that ties the hands of elected governments. In administrations that don't enforce deportations. And in an ecosystem of NGOs, funded by taxpayers and big foundations, that turns every attempt at control into a moral scandal.

The institutions have been captured by an ideology: one that sees borders as immoral, and the citizen who worries about them as the problem.

A civilization isn't a territory with a GDP. It's a language, customs, trust between strangers, a relationship to the law, to women, to free speech. It gets passed down. It doesn't survive mass inflows without assimilation.

We abandoned assimilation. We kept the inflows.

The next 5 to 15 years will decide whether Europe stays Europe. Give migration decisions back to voters. Reform asylum law. Enforce deportations. Demand assimilation.

Not in 20 years. Now. After that, it'll be too late.

[Guillaume Herblot 🎖️ @Guigz75116]

Le monde doit voir les ruines de la mairie de Limoges, monument classé (1883, inspiré de l’Hôtel de Ville de Paris), après l’incendie volontaire du 17 octobre 2026.

Toiture et beffroi effondrés. Partie historique quasi 100 % détruite à l’intérieur. Coquille vide, charpentes calcinées, fumées encore visibles, archives et registres en partie perdus.

Des agents municipaux menacés de mort pendant que les incendiaires s’y introduisaient en brisant les vitres.
Ce n’est pas un accident. C’est sciemment, une « horde sauvage ». En marge d’une manif « contre la vie chère ».

Le maire Guillaume Guérin a parlé de haine des institutions et du drapeau français.
Certains l’appellent la « Notre-Dame de la République ». Sauf que là, ce n’est pas un accident : ce sont des gens qui ont voulu brûler le symbole républicain sous les yeux des habitants, pendant que d’autres applaudissaient les effondrements.

Les images de l’intérieur (hall dévasté, étages éventrés, structures fragilisées) montrent l’ampleur du désastre patrimonial.
Des Limougeauds en larmes derrière les rubalises. Une marche de milliers de personnes pour dire que la République ne se laisse pas intimider.

Regardez ces images. C’est ce que certains appellent encore « contestation ».
C’est tout simplement la haine de la France tout simplement.

[Michelle Stirling @stirlingmichell]

.@AnitaAnandMP

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

Twice as many Christians have been murdered by Islamists in Africa in the past year than Palestinians in Gaza during the past three years of war.

Yet, the media has entirely ignored the ongoing slaughter of Christians in Africa.

[Jim McMurtry @JimMcMurtry01]

Those who speak badly about colonialism should ask if Indigenous people would be happier in an igloo or wigwam and without the conveniences of modern life—such as indoor heating, electricity, toilets and a nearby gas station or grocery store.

[The Architect. @TheMarcitect]

How is it two adults are beheaded for a simple kiss but Saudis raping pre pubescent girls is "culture." These people are not our friends.

[NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 @japan_nobunaga]

フランスには渡航禁止命令を日本政府が出すべきだと思うんだけど、そろそろ。

ほとんどアフガニスタンじゃん、もう。

[Dr. Eli David @DrEliDavid]

This flag doesn't represent anything real. There is no such state, and there never was.

But this flag accurately represents is the ideology of hatred towards the West. In every country this flag is waved, death and destruction follow.

[Michelle Stirling @stirlingmichell]

.@AnitaAnandMP

[Christian Tweets @JesusSavesUs777]

This Christian woman from Nigeria watched as Islamic terrorists murdered her husband and two little children right in front of her.

Then they chopped off her hand.

We have to speak up for these persecuted Christians.

We have to stop this genocide.

[Damien Rieu @DamienRieu]

Il est 20h. Les enfants sont couchés.

Vous êtes tranquillement devant la télé avec votre femme.

Soudain, des cris éclatent dans la rue. Des coups, des vitres qui explosent. Des dizaines d’émeutiers vêtus de noir s’en prennent à votre immeuble. Ils tentent de forcer la porte, saccagent le hall, arrachent les boîtes aux lettres.

Vos enfants se réveillent en hurlant. Votre femme panique.

Vous appelez la police.

« Tous nos agents sont occupés, veuillez patienter. »

Puis la communication coupe.

Vous jetez un œil par la fenêtre. En bas, ils viennent de mettre le feu aux poubelles. Les flammes lèchent déjà la façade. La fumée commence à entrer dans l’appartement.

Soudain, un grand fracas.

La porte de l’immeuble vient de céder.

Des hurlements montent dans l’escalier.

« On va vous tuer ! Ouvrez cette putain de porte ! »

Ils sont sur votre palier.
Vous n’osez même pas regarder par l’œil de bœuf.
Que faire ?

Sortir ? Fuir ? Impossible. Ils sont dans l’escalier.

Sauter par la fenêtre ? Vous êtes au quatrième étage.

Se défendre ? Avec quoi ?

Vous n’avez jamais pensé avoir besoin de vous défendre chez vous. Vous avez toujours fait confiance à l’État. Les armes, ce n’est pas votre truc.

Vous avez travaillé toute votre vie, payé vos impôts, respecté les lois.

Et maintenant, vous voilà coincé dans votre propre appartement, avec vos enfants en pleurs et votre femme qui vous demande ce qu’on va faire.

Derrière la porte, les pas se rapprochent.

Cette fois, ce n’est pas une vidéo d’émeutes que vous regardez à la télévision. C’est chez vous que ça se passe.

Et personne ne viendra vous protéger.

[Anant @singh31919]

सऊदी अरब में बांग्लादेश के दंपति का सर कलम करके मौत की सजा देने के बाद उनके शव बांग्लादेश पहुंच गए जिसका अंतिम संस्कार कर दिया गया

पता चल रहा है कि उन दोनों की एक 8 साल की बेटी भी है जो अब अनाथ हो गई

अब जाकर बांग्लादेश के दंपति की मौत की सजा के मामले पर पूरी घटनाक्रम सऊदी अरब ने सामने रखा है

बांग्लादेश का एक दंपति जो पति-पत्नी थे वह उमरा करने सऊदी अरब गए

मक्का की एक मस्जिद में उन्होंने नमाज अदा किया और भाव विभोर होकर एक दूसरे से गले लग गए और एक दूसरे को kiss कर लिया

और यह सब करते हुए उनकी आंखों में आंसू थे जाहिर सी बात है कि उनका एक सपना पूरा हुआ था कि वह उमरा पर आए हैं तो यह उन्होंने किसी अश्लीलता की वजह से नहीं किया था बल्कि भाव विभोर होकर किया था

और एक पाकिस्तानी ने उनका वीडियो बनाकर वायरल कर दिया और उनका सर कलम हो गया

ये जो सोच है ना कि दो लोगों के एक दुसरे को चूमने से खुदा नाराज हो जाएगा और गर्दन काटने से खुश हो जाएगा यही कट्टरपंथ की सबसे बड़ी बीमारी है।

एक तरफ कहते हो इस्लाम अमन का मजहब है, दूसरी तरफ एक रील, एक चुंबन पर सर कलम?

मक्का की मस्जिद क्या इबादत की जगह है या तुम्हारे अहंकार का कत्लगाह?

अगर खुदा इतना ही कमजोर है कि दो लोगों के प्यार से उसकी मस्जिद नापाक हो जाती है, तो फिर वो खुदा कैसा? खुदा को तुम्हारी तलवार की जरूरत क्यों है अपनी हिफाजत के लिए?

तुमने दो लोगों को नहीं मारा, तुमने ये साबित किया है कि तुम्हारी सोच आज भी 7वीं सदी के रेगिस्तान में ही अटकी हुई है।

जहाँ प्यार गुनाह है और कत्ल इंसाफ।

और फिर कहते हो दुनिया इस्लामोफोबिक है - दुनिया तुम्हारे इस कृत्य से डरती है, तुम्हारे मजहब से नहीं।

बेटी अनाथ हो गई, दो परिवार खत्म, और तुम्हें लगा तुमने धर्म बचा लिया? तुमने धर्म नहीं, अपनी दरिंदगी का प्रदर्शन किया है।
#SaudiArabia #BangladeshiCouple

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

You won't stop the carnage we see in France by passing a few immigration reforms -- as British politicians are now suggesting.

Tighten immigration, sure. But the problem we face is much bigger than this.

What we are witnessing is a highly-coordinated, deeply ideological and concerted war on not just France but the West more broadly.

At the heart of it is a 'Red-Green' alliance of left-wing extremists, Islamists, and the Palestinian movement that has now morphed into a revolutionary movement.

It wants nothing less than the destruction, dismantling, or 'deconstruction' of Western civilisation.

And it is benefitting from a wider circle of 'tacit support' within our own Western institutions -- our schools, universities, media, publishing, and more.

These activists are now exploiting a West that has become dangerously divided, deluded, & demoralised.

While the West has certainly eroded itself and emboldened its enemies through mass immigration and broken borders, it has also taken a sledgehammer to its own foundations by teaching its own young people to hate who they are -- to hate their own history, culture, identity, and inheritance.

Scruton called this Oikophobia. Furedi called it the war against our past. In France, Philippe de Villiers calls it 'Memoricide'. The stripping away of any sense of who we are. It is cultural vandalism against ourselves.

China, Russia, Islamic states, they are all laughing at us.

We have cut our own young people off from the West's distinctive and proud history by either telling them our nations are racist and embarrassing or bombarding them with historically illiterate documentaries and Netflix shows that present the West as evil.

Unsurprisingly, they now feel little attachment or loyalty to their own nations while many young people today, put simply, don't even know who they are.

With no strong sense of national identity, and no real understanding of where they are from or what their ancestors built, they have become completely disoriented, bobbing around on a sea of globalism and phone-induced narcissism.

The young French destroy their country because they feel no loyalty to their country.

Somebody said to me recently the West resembles a bouquet of flowers on the mantlepiece -- it is still beautiful but if you look closely it's roots have been cut off and it is now slowly dying in the vase.

In the first instance, France is suffering the effects of all this, looking on at a generation that clearly hate its own nation or at least feel no attachment to it.

But this deeper malaise is now visible in pretty much every Western state today, having been encouraged by a political class that decided it was a good idea to redefine Western nations as empty vessels that are merely here to show empathy towards everybody else.

Immigration reforms might help but what we are facing now is actually much bigger than any of that.

As Scruton, Furedi, Caldwall, Phillips, Murray, Lasch and others have been warning us for many many years, there is a war against the West and before it even really begins we are already helping our enemies by cutting off our own legs.

Today it is France, tomorrow it will be everywhere.

[Ô.Mercedes @DolceVenezia74]

⚠️"Il faut que tout le monde voie ces images".
Guillaume Guérin, maire de Limoges, nous fait une visite de son Hôtel de Ville sous les décombres.

Je me refuse désormais à nommer ces gens-là d'émeutiers ou de casseurs.
Ce sont des terroristes.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Even though I am an evangelical Christian, I have always defended the Catholic and Maronite statues in Lebanon and opposed evangelicals who wanted them removed.

My reason was not theological. It was civilizational.

In Lebanon, when you entered a town or village and saw a statue of Jesus, Mary, or a saint standing publicly, it meant that this place had not yet been Islamized.

It meant Christians still possessed enough freedom and confidence to display their faith publicly.

The statue was therefore more than a statue. It was a civilizational marker. It announced that Islam was not sovereign over that space.

When evangelicals attacked those statues purely on theological grounds, they failed to understand what they were helping to dismantle.

In their zeal to remove what they considered an unbiblical symbol, they were also weakening a visible symbol of the very freedom that allowed evangelicals themselves to exist, preach, convert, and criticize.

I see Christians in the West making a similar mistake today with the Jews.

They attack Jews or Israel for theological reasons while failing to understand the civilizational struggle taking place around them.

Israel is under attack by forces that do not merely see it as another country. They see Israel as an outpost and symbol of the Western order they despise.

When Christians turn against Jews simply because Judaism rejects Christ, they may believe they are defending theological truth while, in reality, helping the forces that are hostile to Christianity as well.

Lebanese Christians needed those Catholic statues even when evangelicals believed the statues were unbiblical.

And the West needs the unbelieving Jew for the same civilizational reason.

You do not have to agree with someone theologically to understand that his freedom, his survival, and his continued presence is bound up with your own.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Let's talk about Bill Gates, because his life is the clearest illustration of the spectrum I described: builders versus players.

Start with the builder. In 1980, IBM needed an operating system. Gates didn't have one, so he bought one from a small Seattle company, adapted it, and licensed it to IBM while keeping the right to sell it to everyone else. That move created the PC industry. "A computer on every desk and in every home" sounded absurd. He made it real.

Was it clean? No. Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer into Windows to strangle Netscape, and a US federal court found it had illegally maintained its monopoly. Gates was ruthless. But it was still building. Ruthless in service of a product hundreds of millions of people chose to use. Reality was the judge.

Then he left that game for philanthropy. And I think the philanthropy playbook slowly ate his soul.

Because at that scale, philanthropy isn't building. Your product is no longer software. Your product is influence over how billions of people should live.

And this is where the worldview matters.

Elon and Gates disagree on the most fundamental question there is: are there too many humans, or too few?

Elon thinks the planet is underpopulated, that collapsing birth rates are one of the greatest risks to civilization, and that humanity should expand, all the way to other planets.

Gates has spent years worrying about population growth, emissions, resources. Humanity as a load on the system. Something to be managed, optimized, reduced in its footprint.

Elon has a word for where that worldview leads when you push it to the end: extinctionist. The belief, spoken or not, that humanity itself is the problem.

I want to be precise here. I don't think Gates wakes up wanting humanity to disappear. It's quite possible he sincerely believes he's saving the world. That's exactly what I said about Macron, and it's what makes it dangerous.

Look at the pattern. Population, emissions, what people should eat, how farmland should be used, how children should be taught, how global health should be organized. Gates sees the world as a system to be optimized from above, by experts, with enough money and enough data.

That's not Marxism in economics. Gates is the archetypal capitalist. But it rhymes with Marx on the deepest level: the planner's arrogance. The conviction that a small, enlightened group can understand society well enough to steer it. The same false axioms I described about Macron: humanity as variables in a model, not as billions of free people making their own choices.

Now multiply that by money.

When a regular person has wrong ideas, they mostly harm themselves. When a politician has wrong ideas, elections can eventually stop him. When a company has wrong ideas, customers walk away and competitors win.

A billionaire philanthropist with wrong ideas has none of those brakes. No voters. No customers. No competitors. He defines the problem, funds the solution, and grades his own work. And he can pour hundreds of billions into it over decades.

Good intentions, plus false axioms, plus near-unlimited money, plus zero feedback. That's the most dangerous combination I know.

And look at the two visions side by side.

The builder bets that humanity is precious and should grow. More people, more minds, more creativity, more of the universe made conscious.

The planner bets that humanity is a problem to be managed. Fewer emissions, smaller footprints, tighter control, decided from above.

One is a philosophy of abundance. The other is a philosophy of scarcity dressed up as compassion.

The most dangerous man in the world isn't the cartoon villain. It's the sincere planner with infinite money and no feedback loop.

Don't manage humanity. Build for it.

[Michelle Stirling @stirlingmichell]

.@umanitoba @CMHR_News Here's a real genocide going on. Your Human Rights advocates are silent. Why?

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

Just a few months ago there were a number of massacres of Christian communities by islamists in Ethiopia. Dozens were slaughtered by them at a time.

People don’t even realize how serious and widespread the massacre of Christians is in Africa. It really is a genocide by its very definition because the sole intent is to wipe out all non Muslims.

[Henrik Dahl @SociologenHD]

I do not know how things are in other countries. But in Denmark, when I follow the coverage of the unrest in France on our two public-service television broadcasters, the explanation I keep hearing is this:

France has spent years cutting back on upper secondary education. Classes are overcrowded. Add teacher shortages and excessive centralisation, and young people take to the streets.

That is only half the truth. And when you peddle half the truth, you are, as we know, also peddling half a lie.

Here is what can be pieced together from the French quality press and the official figures.

France’s public spending per upper-secondary pupil is above the OECD average. That should complicate any account which treats a lack of money as the whole explanation.

There is some truth in the criticism: some lycées have large classes, and the French education system is centralised and bureaucratic.

One example worth mentioning is Parcoursup, the higher education admissions platform. I suspect it would be a strong contender in any international competition for bureaucratic opacity and unnecessary stress.

But, as I have already said, this is only half the truth.

The other half concerns what teachers and school leaders are being asked to endure.

I admit that this is anecdotal. But recently, a math teacher from Metz described in a long and serious post on X how the teachers simply burn out at the most problematic high schools. We need to dig deeper into this constant attrition of skilled high school teachers.

Why are schools being left to carry so much of the burden?

French politicians are no different from politicians elsewhere in Europe.

They want as many young people as possible to complete upper secondary education and go on to higher education. For the usual reasons: education is supposed to break the cycle of inherited disadvantage, while higher education is supposed to raise productivity. I find those arguments only partly convincing when these benefits are treated as automatic consequences of expanding access.

In my view, France faces a problem we also know in Denmark: schools are being asked to compensate for failures of integration and basic socialisation that extend far beyond the classroom.

The danger is that, instead of institutions civilising their pupils, disruptive pupils end up barbarising the institutions.

No school can function properly if it is expected to tolerate young people who turn up unprepared, have no interest in learning and spend their time causing trouble and destroying the learning environment.

It is hardly surprising that such conditions can wear teachers down. They cannot reasonably be expected to shoulder the entire responsibility for correcting mistakes that the French political elite has spent decades making.

La France Insoumise and other radical organisations have encouraged the protests and blockades. Mélenchon has called for non-violence. However, this formal appeal for moderation appears symbolic when the LFI mayor of Saint-Denis simultaneously allows himself to be photographed among demonstrators and calls their actions justified.

Le Point has meanwhile reported on mobilisation by Étudiants musulmans de France and its cooperation with RED Jeunes. The former is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood milieu in a French Interior Ministry report; the two organisations helped establish the anti-Islamophobia collective Génération EDR, whose links to the antifascist group La Jeune Garde are also described by Le Point.

That is the kind of convergence I mean by Islamogauchism in practice.

The flags also deserve attention. Palestinian, Moroccan and Algerian flags have appeared at some of the protests, including scenes of disorder. To me, this is another indication that, for some participants, the agenda extends beyond class sizes and school budgets.

We do not yet know the full picture. But what concerns me is the apparent convergence, within parts of this movement, of several forms of radicalism: Antifa activism. Decolonial ideology. Islamogauchism. Islamist networks that have learnt from the left to speak fluent woke.

That is why I do not think it entirely misplaced to speak of an “Islamogauchist intifada” when describing this radical current within the French protests.

The wider protest wave has already spread to Belgium and Italy.

The Danish public-service coverage I have seen gives me far too little of this side of the story.

Two questions: Is it the same elsewhere in the Western world? And if so, why?

[Larry Alex Taunton @LarryTaunton]

I got in the car at the airport and the seat was laid flat so that I was not visible. The driver changed into the uniform of a police officer hoping we’d be waved through military checkpoints. Then we hit the open roads to drive some 6- hours north — on African roads.

The open country is where the real danger lurks. Fulani herdsmen or Boko Haram, both Muslim terrorist groups, are known to throw obstacles out into your path — burning tires, spike strips, anything. When you brake hard and hit reverse, another group, armed with AK47s, comes out of hiding and throws obstacles behind you. If you don’t stop, they will simply riddle the car with bullets. Unless you are very lucky, you are trapped.

The goal is hostages, especially Christians and Westerners. They kidnap you and send your body parts bit by bloody bit to your family demanding payment for your release. The government and the UN are both corrupt and look the other way.

We stop for gas. I’m noticed by children. Word spreads rapidly that a white man, seldom seen in the north, is in that car. Soon the car is mobbed by people pressing theirs noses to the windows to peer in. Some are shouting and knocking on the glass. Most of it is just curiosity and not malevolence. I get out and walk around. They press against me, and I push them off. Hard. You get used to it, but you must make them respect your space. (Muslims will do the same in Hyde Park. You’ll never see a knife coming if you allow that.)

In those parts of the world that are dangerous for Americans, you must be wary of the children. Watch them. In South America, for instance, many are in the employ of the cartels. It’s no different in Africa or the Middle East. They are given cell phones, some money or candy or some other incentive, and told to report anything unusual. If you see one looking at you and reach for a cell phone, it should trigger alarms in your head. It’s time to move. Fast.

We drive on past burning villages, through desert country, and finally to a compound where I am locked in from the outside. The windows are heavily barred. If there’s a fire, I cannot escape. Welcome to West Africa.

The Christians who house me often do so at considerable risk. As an American, I’m deemed to be valuable if kidnapped. They would likely be killed. They are courageous, extraordinary people. They tell me stories of family members murdered: boys and men shot or killed with machetes; women raped and mutilated, and girls taken into sex slavery. This is daily life for them and has been since ~2000, and intensifying in 2012 and after.

Yet many are joyful, warm, good humored, and hopeful. They want to know how many are with me and if America is going to send them help. It pains me to say that I am alone and probably not. They look downcast, but quickly cheer up and move to other topics.

I speak in their churches on apologetics, but the apologetics they need is of the physical type. I preach in the cathedral on hope. Muslims gather round the church and stare through the windows to intimidate. The cathedral had once been bombed. We press on and sing in defiance. When I am finished many are emotional, thankful, as if I had preached the most wonderful sermon. I had not. It was hot, stuff, the sound was poor, and the distractions many. But that was beside the point for them. My simply being there, risking something on their behalf, that’s what mattered more than any words.

Pray for these people who suffer under the sword of Islam.

[Rod Dreher @roddreher]

Absolutely stunning essay by @DouglasKMurray about the crisis in France. It includes this quote.
https://t.co/XBw5Xr5lTp

[Itai Cellier @hikelikeme]

האסימון מתחיל ליפול לחלק מהצרפתים. פה אתם יכולים לראות ציוץ של אדריכל צרפתי ופודקאסטר שאומר:

״אף פעם לא הייתי פרו-ישראלי. גם לא נגדם מצד שני. אם לומר את האמת, ממש לא היה אכפת לי מהקונפליקט הזה.
אבל מרוב שאני רואה עדרים של ברברים ששוברים הכל תוך שהם עוטים דגל פלסטיני, דחף מוזר עולה בי: הדחף לחשוב שיכול להיות שהצבא הישראלי הבין משהו.