David Hull

[STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand]

FEMINISM CAN ONLY EXIST INSIDE PATRIARCHY. IT COULD NEVER SURVIVE OUTSIDE IT.

Feminism doesn’t fight patriarchy. It needs patriarchy to justify its existence.

Feminism needs:

The police force built by men to protect her right to protest

The laws written by men to give her equal rights

The military of men to keep her country safe so she can complain about men

The electricity, roads, infrastructure, technology invented by men to give her a platform to say men are useless

The food supply chain built by men working dangerous jobs to keep her fed while she says she doesn't need men

Outside of patriarchy? In the real state of nature?

No police. No laws. No rights. No grocery store. No AC. No internet.

Just raw survival. Brute strength. Violence. Starvation.

In that world, feminism dies in 24 hours. Because in that world, a woman with a gender studies degree cannot compete with a man with an axe. She NEEDS the patriarchal structure to survive.

Feminism is a luxury belief that only exists when men have already made life so safe and comfortable that women can afford to pretend men aren't necessary.

You will never see feminism in a war zone. In a famine. In a collapsing country. In a village with no running water.

You only see it in first-world countries, in safe cities, where men have built everything so well that women forgot who built it.

That's why feminism can only exist INSIDE patriarchy. It could never survive OUTSIDE it.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I want to be really clear with my words here, as I have done since the day I launched Restore Britain as a national political party.

Islam’s influence over our way of life is far too large, far too powerful, far too much.

I visited streets in Greater Manchester where the local British population have been replaced, there is no other word for it - replaced. We were almost chased out.

Why has that been allowed to happen?

Go and watch the vote count for those areas.

Stacks and stacks and stacks of Labour votes. A mountain of them. They have imported a voter base, and continue to do so.

In the British areas across Greater Manchester, Restore Britain and Reform competed in the election - both winning thousands and thousands of votes.

More Muslim areas? Both parties got battered, mainly on the postal votes.

You can all draw your own conclusions there. I know I have…

With current birthrates, and levels of mass immigration, the Muslim population will grow and grow and grow.

It is a demographic inevitability, unless we change course VERY soon.

End mass immigration from Islamic countries. Ban the burqa, halal slaughter, cousin marriage. If a mosque is promoting hate, shut it down. Remove the foreign/dual nationals responsible. End mass dominating Islamic public prayer. Deport foreigners incapable of speaking English, refusing to work, living in social housing.

Brutally remove the cancer of Islamism.

That is what Restore Britain will do.

I am not going to sit back and watch Britain become an Islamic country.

And make no mistake - that is what we are hurtling towards.

Those wards in Greater Manchester, stacking the Muslim vote? They will turn into entire cities, counties, the entire nation.

Britain is still a Christian country, with Christian values and Christian traditions. Just.

I will promise you this.

Restore Britain will use every democratic tool available to us in order to ensure it stays that way.

If you agree, then back us and our mission to Restore Britain.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@LisaBritton What a spoiled and ignorant woman. She's so blinded by her man-hating ideology that she doesn't realize that men didn't make the world for us men. We literally tamed it to make it easy and safe for our women. Ingratitude is one of the ugliest of human traits.

[The Transformed Wife 🦋 @godlywomanhood]

Most women I’ve known in my adult life, who divorced their husbands, destroyed their children’s lives.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@Harnarayan_s @venom1s LOL 😂

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

We are appealing this back to the Supreme Court. 

The Second Circuit ruled this way last year and the Supreme Court vacated it and told them to try again. They decided to again violate the rights of the Amish. So, we will be going back to the Supreme Court.

Also, yes, the Amish children in this case are far healthier than American children who are vaccinated. Our sworn papers make that clear that the families in the three Amish schools at issue in this case have a total of 168 unvaccinated children (no vaccines) and that none of these children have any of the chronic health issues that plague children in the United States.

We also provided sworn expert evidence attesting that among a random sample of 168 U.S. children, one would expect to find (based on the background rate of chronic disease among U.S. children) 31 cases of environmental allergies, 15 cases of ADHD, 10 cases of asthma, 9 cases of food allergies, and 4 cases of ASD. Yet, the 168 unvaccinated Amish children whose families New York wants to persecute are free from the chronic health conditions—all related to some form of immune system dysregulation—that plague the vaccinated communities in New York.

Since vaccination is supposedly about improving health, and the Amish who do not vaccinate are clearly healthier, one would expect New York to leave them alone. But that is not how this religion works. The vaccine zealots in New York cannot stand that the Amish refuse to abandon their beliefs in favor of the religious beliefs held by the New York officials regarding vaccines. These “health” officials are willing to sacrifice the way of life and belief system of these Amish children and their community, that has kept them far healthier, if they refuse to bend the knee to adopt cult-like vaccine beliefs.

These “health” officials also apparently cannot stand that the Amish children are healthier and are even willing to wage war against them until they submit and receive every vaccine New York demands—so they can be just as “healthy” as all the children outside the Amish community.

The Amish earnestly seek to avoid conflict but because violating their sincerely held religious beliefs is not an option, they have been placed in the impossible position of being required to leave New York to simply send their healthy children to Amish schools on Amish land. We, along with co-counsel, intend to continue litigate on behalf of the Amish to defend their freedom to practice their religion in peace.

[Homer Pavlos @HomerPavlos]

The Odyssey begins by showing an African rapper with rasta in the role of a Greek poet. We Greeks are forced to watch our Greek history and culture being disgraced and mocked across the entire world. What is Nolan's real role in doing something like this instead of casting a Greek person speaking Greek? What's the purpose of casting someone with rasta in the Greek world?

I'll tell you. Nolan and Hollywood are the real racists and enemies of the West. They hate us Greeks. The simplest confirmation comes from the fact that when a film is about African history, they don't cast white people, only Africans. When it's about Chinese or Japanese history, they cast only Asians, and they even speak only in their own language. But now that the time has come for a film based on Greek history with Greeks, not a single Greek is cast, they don't speak even a bit of Greek, and they don't even respect Homer. So, for films about European cultures, Africans, Asians, and anything else must be cast, but when it comes to African culture, whites are not allowed to play those roles.

This is the real racism of Hollywood.

Hollywood is a cancer that rots your souls and enslaves your minds and spirits. They hate you and they want to destroy you. Never forget the real enemies of the West and of your race. Those who are in universities, the academics, teaching your children how to hate their ancestors instead of honoring them. Don't do them the favor. Love the Greco-Roman world and fight those who hate you.

Never forget the traitors who took everything as a joke and contributed to the plan to destroy Western civilization.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@AndrewZywiecMD Who is that clueless idiot? What "rights" is she lacking? She's privileged. She can vote without registering for Selective Service and potentially putting her life in danger like men must, and she can legally murder any unborn children she may conceive. "Rights" no men have.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@RepNancyMace Easy...we keep treating rogue judges' decisions as law rather than defying them. Or start impeaching them. Congress has that power yet they rarely utilize it.

[White Baby Factory @WhiteBabyFac]

People think abolishing abortion would result in more kids being born into unstable families, but the opposite is true.

If women didn't have abortion as an option, they would have to have to take sex more seriously.
Women who had casual sex would end up as single mothers and would be an example to other young women as to why saving sex for marriage is so important.

Young men would have to become more responsible to attract a woman, since sex and raising children would go hand-in-hand.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

Dependence is the core of all social structures

Men are of course dependent on many things but women, due to the biological vulnerability, were always directly dependent on men

Once birth control and abortion made pregnancy a choice instead of an inevitability, the state promised broader physical protection, and corporations provided individual streams of income, women traded their dependence on men for dependence on corporations and the state

They functionally the married men of the state and the men running their company and called it liberation

Women do not date men who make less than them even if they think of themselves as independent because deep down they know that signals status and protection

Even the most competent and independent woman wants a man who could care for her if she became vulnerable

With the push to elevate women in education and hiring the majority of degrees and well paying jobs go to women, who are more valuable to employers due their more agreeable nature

Women are statistically less likely to ask for raises, raise questions about poor treatment, and oppose their own replacement

Men are being systemically removed from the pool of attractive marriage prospects, and this combined with one sided divorce and child custody laws means many stop bothering to try

There's a lot of focus from conservatives on telling young men to "grow up, do better, figure it out"

Probably good advice for any given individual who can only control what they can control, but its a terrible answer at the level of culture and policy

Conservatives don't want to touch this stuff so they blame young man, but the truth is that pharmaceuticals, corporations, the growth of the state, the legal system, and simply the inability to tell women that cubicles will not bring you happiness are just as, or really far more, important

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@msmaureen90 @real_nickfortun @oliviakrolczyk_ If women leave those "meaningless jobs" , they will go away or be filled by men at least those jobs that are actually necessary. But, with women gone, they will no longer have to create those unnecessary jobs in order to elevate women ahead of men with DEI and affirmative action.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@robbystarbuck This was before the great replacement.

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@RandPaul And yet to date none of the COVID perpetrators have been brought to justice. Not one. So, it's almost certain we'll get another "pandemic" since no price was paid by anyone for the lies and deaths.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Some exciting news to share - Restore Britain's membership has just gone through 120,000.

That is double the Liberal Democrats. Double.

Almost entirely done through social media.

Less than six weeks after launch, less than one week after our official registration as a political party.

Our ground game is now firing. Approaching 400 parliamentary constituencies now have local branches up and running. Introductory meetings happening every day.

The billboard campaign is on, with leaflets going through doors - thousands and thousands more every day.

Regardless of what you think of our politics, this is a uniquely impressive achievement. Nothing like it has ever happened in British politics. Ever.

According to yougov, I have the best approval ratings of any party leader - I'm not even a sodding politician.

That is why the establishment detest us.

I would have it no other way.

We have no interest in reforming the establishment.

I want to smash the establishment - destroy it, and start again. Rebuilding a system that puts one group of people at the top of the agenda, every single time.

The British people.

Does that make us extreme or radical?

Irrelevant.

We are going to do what needs to be done, however painful that will be.

We are going to Restore Britain.

[Moongazer @joeybeastmarket]

Yes every white country at the same time exponentially increased how many violent third worlders they let in. And yes these countries all at once started teaching children their ancestors were uniquely evil while portraying every nonwhite group as eternal victims who only ever contributed positively.

And yes they all simultaneously pushed the idea that any expression of white in-group preference or pride was inherently supremacist and dangerous. And yes they all celebrated and funded every other ethnic group's identity organizations and pride events.

And yes every major political party in these unrelated countries openly endorsed or quietly facilitated more nonwhite immigration. And yes they all said it was out of moral progress or economic necessity or demographic inevitability.

And yes they all at the same time began labeling any politician or party that tried to slow or reverse the flow as far right or extremist or threat to democracy even when those parties were polling 40% among native voters. And yes the intelligence agencies in these countries all started treating native critics of mass migration as bigger domestic terrorism threats than the actual imported gangs and jihadist networks.

And yes the banking system and payment processors all at the same time began deplatforming and financially crippling anyone who spoke too plainly about the pattern. And yes legacy media coordinated identical smear campaigns against anyone who noticed.

And yes all at the same time fertility among the native white populations collapsed. And yes this was encouraged through cultural messaging and economic pressure and delayed family formation and pharmaceutical and surgical interventions representing liberation while all the same countries imported replacement-level amounts of third worlders with higher birth rates.

And yes they were immediately fast tracked to citizenship. And yes in all these countries at the same time welfare systems were reoriented to subsidize the invaders more generously than struggling native families which created observably tiered outcomes that were blamed on systemic racism when white people noticed.

And yes all of these countries at the same time experienced violent crime spikes and sexual predation scandals and fraud and welfare strain and cultural erosion. And yes when that became impossible to hide every single one of these countries responded with more censorship and more gaslighting and more "diversity is our strength" slogans and more blaming the native population for not embracing the transformation fast enough and more acceleration of the policies that caused the problems.

And yes all these countries at the same time made it functionally illegal to dissent to this. And yes they all deployed the same hate speech laws and online content bans and deplatforming pressure and extremism watchlists to silence natives who objected. And yes in every country the native population was told to adapt and lower their standards and to accept erosion of their safety and traditions and future under the banner of tolerance and inclusion that always didn’t extend to their own group interests.

But NO: despite this precisely repeating across every white country at the same time with no exceptions and no natural divergence you must accept this is all just a spontaneous and completely unrelated convergence of policy and culture across dozens of sovereign nations with no central directive or shared blueprint or common architects.

And NO it’s certainly nothing that can’t be reversed through ordinary electoral politics within the same system that enforced this entire transformation at every step.

There is no reason to ask who or why. It’s all a coincidence. We can vote our way out of this

[David Hull @stockpicker95]

@elonmusk Democrats want judges to release criminals out on the streets causing chaos. Republicans SAY they don't want the chaos but do nothing regarding judges. Not sure which is worse.

[Del Bigtree @delbigtree]

A few days ago a judge decided he knows more about children's health than Robert Kennedy Jr. and every member of the ACIP committee... And everyone at HHS, the CDC, and other.. This is a judge with no medical degree, no pediatric expertise, and a lifetime appointment... and with one ruling, he erased the most meaningful attempt to protect American children this government has ever made.

Reuters called it "upending Kennedy's overhaul of childhood vaccine policies." Here's what actually happened.

RFK Jr. looked at peer nations (like Denmark and Germany) with healthy kids and functioning societies, and said let's see if there's a smarter schedule. What he found was that we give 54 shots of 72 vaccine doses. Denmark gives roughly half that. And Denmark has not seen measles come back, or polio come back, or smallpox come back.

None of the fear porn the American Academy of Pediatrics has been selling you has actually happened.

Meanwhile we went from 12% of American children with chronic disease in the 1980s to nearly 50% today. In 48 years, we have seen the greatest collapse of children's health in the history of this country, happening in perfect parallel with a vaccine schedule that grew from 12 vaccines to 54 shots.

You cannot look at the health of American children and call that program a success. You simply cannot.

So what did the judge do? He said RFK Jr. didn't run it by ACIP, the advisory committee that by everyone's understanding has always been advisory only. No binding authority, just an opinion, not a mandate. At least that's what they always told us when the committee was captured... And then when Kennedy moved to satisfy that requirement, the judge said he didn't recognize the current ACIP either.

There is no committee he recognizes. According to him there are no changes allowed in either direction, no new vaccines can be added, there can be no modifications for any reason, including a bioweapon attack. One judge has put the entire country in limbo to protect a rubber-stamp committee that has never once had a genuine skeptic in the room.

A committee where members like Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while personally developing a rotavirus vaccine and didn't recuse himself. That's the balance they're defending.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, a trade organization funded by the pharmaceutical industry, went to court to make sure your doctor has no say in your child's vaccine schedule. They don't want pediatricians in the conversation. They want the government to decide.

This is what happens when you try to clean the swamp. The swamp has judges.

This case is not over. It's an injunction, not a final ruling. The Trump administration will appeal. And we will keep fighting.

Because the children of this country deserve better than what 40 years of this program has given them.

[Leonarda Jonie @Leonardaisfunny]

It’s a mental one too. For the love of God, DO NOT PUT US IN CHARGE OF SHIT.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Britain is not an Islamic country, yet. We should not change our way of life to accommodate practices that have no place in any civilised society - sharia law, the burqa, halal slaughter, cousin marriage and more.

Britain is a Christian country, and under a Restore Britain Government it would remain that way.

We would not tolerate mass dominating Islamic prayer overtaking public spaces, entire schools would not be closed for Eid.

None of this is controversial. None of this should generate hysteria. But of course it will.

If a Muslim wants to live under sharia law, there are many countries to choose from.

I wish them well on their travels.

But this is Britain, and we have already tolerated the intolerable for too long. That must end.

There is finally a political party that has the courage to unapologetically stand up and defend the British way of life - one that is absolutely rooted in Christianity.

That party is Restore Britain.