@HoosierCovey@SVPAnalytics I seriously doubt that the Big Ten Tournament didn’t mean anything to Michigan.
It’s easy to say it doesn’t mean anything when someone else wins.
@CBSSportsCBB@JonRothstein The problem with this comment is that it is not supported by any data. Which specific games in the past Final Fours have favored a team playing close to its home campus?
Butler lost in Indy in 2010.
Purdue lost in Indy in 1980.
@SpainGreatAgain @BleacherReport Why is it that as soon as someone accomplishes something great, there has to be someone who immediately tries to downplay the accomplishment?
@hoffy8121@JustinPerri8 The path to the final should have been against #3, #2, and #1. They ended up beating #6, #2, and #1. How is that a joke of a path?
@YaBoiBrengs@ryanhammer09 Why does this logic only apply to Purdue?
Michigan is in the Big Ten and is reffed by Big Ten referees as well. Are you saying that you reviewed the video of every play by every team in every game and have data that shows a bias to one team in particular?
@BoardGeniuses Fact: Michigan had 7 turnovers and Purdue scored 13 points off of them.
Fact: Michigan shot 7-24 from 3 point range.
That is why Purdue won.
@SidelineWitness@theblockspot You only say they don’t matter because Purdue has more than anyone else. Purdue has 26 regular season conference championships and 3 Big Ten Tournament championships.