@OhYouBlockhead Rule has been in place for 14 years, so this take is wrong. She did bully her way to get what she wanted instead of this rule being applied since the floor was never called.
It’s not visible how the dealer stacked the 4 cards before fanning out flop. Assuming they were fanned out in the correctly> These are the 3 possible outcomes:
Assuming the dealer tried to count out 3 cards and mistakenly grabbed 2 one of the time there are only 3 outcomes:
If on her first pull she grabbed 2x cards the bottom (6d) was official burn,
if on the second pull she grabbed 2x cards the bottom card (6d) is thiss the official burn
If on the third pull she grabbed 2x cards then the second from bottom (Kd) is the official burn.
So it seems there were only 2 possible burn cards :
6d > 66%
Kd > 33%
you cannot definitely say it was the 6d
@TheSaurus831@RickLPoker@DougPolkVids Changed to what ? Burning the 6 ?
even though there is only 66% chance the 6 was burn card and 33% chance the burn was the K ?
🚨 THE TIBBIR STRATEGY: How @mickymalka Could Be Replacing Citadel Without Fighting Citadel 🚨
Everyone thinks @Citadel is @RobinhoodApp most important partner.
What if $Citadel is actually financing the infrastructure that could eventually make its own business model obsolete?
🧵👇
1️⃣ The Weak Spot in Citadel’s Empire
Citadel’s superpower isn’t capital.
It isn’t technology.
It isn’t even speed.
It’s visibility.
Every day, millions of retail orders flow through $Robinhood.
$Citadel pays hundreds of millions of dollars for access to that flow through Payment For Order Flow (PFOF).
The game is simple:
📊 Observe retail behavior.
⚡ Internalize the flow.
💰 Capture the spread.
Repeat billions of times.
Citadel became a Wall Street giant by monetizing information before everyone else.
But what happens when order flow itself evolves?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2️⃣ Robinhood’s AI Pivot Changes Everything
Robinhood is no longer just a brokerage.
The platform is moving toward AI-native investing.
The next generation of market participants may not be humans.
They may be agents.
Thousands.
Millions.
Autonomous software entities making decisions, allocating capital, and executing trades.
That changes the structure of the market itself.
Because AI agents don’t necessarily need traditional intermediaries.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
3️⃣ Why $Tibbir Holdings Matters
Most investors looked at Micky Malka’s massive accumulation of Robinhood shares through $Tibbir Holdings and saw a stock purchase.
But what if $Tibbir Holdings is actually an infrastructure layer?
A balance sheet.
A capital base.
A bridge between traditional equity and programmable finance.
Real-world assets.
Real-world ownership.
Real-world capital.
Connected to an AI-native ecosystem.
Now the picture starts looking very different.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
4️⃣ Turning Equity Into Liquidity
Citadel dominates because it controls enormous pools of collateral.
Market making requires capital.
Lots of it.
Now imagine a future where large equity positions become programmable collateral.
Traditional shares.
Tokenized representations.
Smart-contract infrastructure.
Instant settlement.
Machine-executable ownership.
Instead of relying on centralized balance sheets, AI-native systems gain access to liquidity directly through programmable financial rails.
The result?
A new source of market liquidity that doesn’t look like Wall Street.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
5️⃣ The Digital Swarm
Citadel is centralized.
One organization.
One hierarchy.
One infrastructure stack.
The Tibbir vision points somewhere else.
Imagine thousands of specialized AI agents:
🤖 One trades options.
🤖 One trades crypto.
🤖 One trades volatility.
🤖 One trades prediction markets.
🤖 One allocates treasury assets.
🤖 One manages liquidity.
All operating simultaneously.
All learning continuously.
All coordinating through on-chain infrastructure.
Not one hedge fund.
A swarm.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
6️⃣ The Great Financial Paradox
This is where the story becomes extraordinary.
Citadel pays Robinhood.
Robinhood grows.
$HOOD appreciates.
Tibbir Holdings gains value.
Capital accumulates.
That capital can then be deployed into the next generation of financial infrastructure.
The old system finances the new system.
The incumbent unknowingly funds its potential successor.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🦅 THE ENDGAME
The future battle may not be:
Robinhood vs Citadel.
Or Web2 vs Web3.
Or Stocks vs Crypto.
The real battle is:
Centralized intelligence
vs
Distributed machine intelligence.
One side is built around institutions.
The other is built around autonomous economic agents.
And somewhere between Robinhood, Tibbir, AI agents, tokenized assets, programmable collateral, and instant settlement…
the next financial operating system is quietly being assembled.
The question isn’t whether finance will change
so you're telling me @mickymalka, who accidentally founded Ribbit Capital, the first fund to invest in crypto; who accidentally filed 5 "TIBBIR" legal entities with the SEC; who accidentally used his own wallet to fund the stealth launch of $TIBBIR, who accidentally followed @ribbita2012
has just accidentally created a bottom on a $79 billion market-cap asset: $HOOD , the company he accidentally saved in '21 with a phone call?
and the last time Ribbita showed us an accidental ribbit capital infrastructure stress test, was accidentally at the 5th anniversary of the Robinhood saga? Jan 28?
Assuming the dealer tried to account out 3 cards and mistakenly grabbed 2 one of the time there are only 3 outcomes:
If on her first pull she grabbed 2x cards the bottom (6d) was official burn,
if on the second pull she grabbed 2x cards the bottom card (6d) is thiss the official burn
If on the third pull she grabbed 2x cards then the second from bottom (K) is the official burn.
So it seems there were only 2 possible burn cards and one was 66% vs 33% imo
Assume when fan out 4 card flop they stayed in order from bottom to window card I looked at video 10 times it appears as though they do.
Am I wrong ?
Dealer obviously grabbed 2 cards one of the times, while counting out 3 cards so the true probabilities are>
If on her first pull try she pulled 2x cards the bottom (6d) was official burn,
if on the second pull she pulled 2x cards the bottom card (6d) is thiss the official burn
If on the third pull she pulled 2x cards then the second from bottom (K) is the official burn.
So it seems there were only 2 possible burn cards and one was 6d > 66% vs K > 33% imo
This Assumes when she fans out 4 card flop they stayed in order from bottom to window card I looked at video 10 times it appears as though they do.
Am I wrong ?