Stuart Clark

A happy dad, a Morton fan, a noiseik, a reader and always interested in technology.

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

@MortonSLO Thanks. I've got a season ticket so I was just looking to be shown in.

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

What are the rules for gaining entry after kick off? On Saturday I turned up late at half time and the steward wouldn't let me in (at main stand entrance). I was told it was a SPFL rather than Morton rule but I can't find any evidence for either. 🤷
@MortonSLO

[Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP @CartlandDavid]

Your Right to Refuse Vaccination: Know the Law
Under UK Law, You Cannot Be Forcibly Vaccinated.
Below, outlines your legal rights, protections under the Human Rights Act, Public Health laws, and NHS policy that allow you to lawfully refuse vaccination, now or in the future. This knowledge and strategy application enabled us to protect employees rights under legislation during the so called “lockdown”.
1. Human Rights Act 1998. You are protected by several key rights:
•Article 8 – Right to Private and Family Life
You have the right to bodily autonomy and to make your own medical choices.
•Article 9 – Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion
Religious or moral objections to vaccination must be respected.
•Article 3 – Prohibition of Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
Coercing or forcing vaccination could breach your dignity and human rights.
•Article 14 – Freedom from Discrimination
You must not be unfairly treated for refusing a vaccine due to belief, disability, or medical grounds.
2. Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 – Section 45E
“Regulations... may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment, including vaccination.”
This means compulsory vaccination is illegal under UK public health law.
3. NHS Green Book Policy, official vaccination policy states: Vaccination must always be voluntary.
a.Informed consent is required before any vaccine.
b.Patients have the right to say NO at any time.
c.Medical exemptions (e.g. allergies, immune conditions) must be respected.
d.Religious and ethical objections are also acknowledged.
4. Living Will (Advance Decision). A legally binding way to refuse future vaccination if you're unable to speak for yourself:
4.1 Covered under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
4.2 You can refuse named vaccines, even if your life is at risk.
Must be:
a.Written and signed,
b.Witnessed,
c.Specific about the treatment refused.
This protects you if you lose capacity (e.g. in hospital or under sedation).
5. Capacity and Consent. You always have the right to:
•Refuse treatment if you have mental capacity.
•Withdraw consent at any time.
•Be free from coercion, pressure, or threats.
Summary of Your Rights
Legal BasisWhat It Protects You From
Human Rights ActForced or coerced medical treatment
Public Health Act 1984Any regulation mandating vaccination
NHS Green BookNon-consensual NHS vaccination
Living Will (Advance Decision)Future vaccination when you lack capacity
Mental Capacity LawProtects your right to say no, while capable
You Do NOT Have to Accept a Vaccine
You have the legal right to say no, now or in the future, and to have that choice respected by doctors, employers, schools, or the government.

PROTECTION BY KNOWLEDGE & STRATEGY

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

Oppose councillor mcCabe as council leader - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/B87Dh8M3Hd via @UKChange

[Paul Weston @PWestoff]

The issues facing Britain are civilisational ending, but they are much easier to deal with than another civilisational ending issue we faced in 1940. Our problem today is that not a single political party capable of winning the 2029 election will do anything to defend Britain. Reform under Farage certainly won't, and people need to understand this simple fact. The lives of your children and grandchildren depend on you understanding this.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Jordan Peterson: "I don't know if you guys in the UK understand how sad it is for us in Canada, and in the US, to watch what you're doing to yourselves."

"We owe the UK such an immense debt. And to watch you guys spiral yourselves into the ground for... political correctness... and gaslight people who are telling the truth."

"It's so sickening, it's so demoralising. It's almost unspeakable."

"We all hope and pray... that you get your act together, and grow some spine again, and put your country back together, and stand up to these bloody psychopathic bullies and the woke green mob, because it would be a dreadful shame to lose you."

[Nick Dixon @NickDixon]

Starmer is a managerial midwit.
A brittle man of winter.
A dead-eyed shark pushing ever forward towards his next grim, mechanical task.
You could coax Shakespeare himself down from the heavens to tell him of all England’s beauty and he would only be annoyed that you had kept him from his busywork.
He is a ruddy-faced nothing, an interloper.
To call him a traitor flatters him, as the traitor surely has some sense of his own wrongdoing. Starmer lacks the imagination to arrive even at the foothills of his own wretchedness.
His emptiness could fill entire stadia.
He is the final form of managerial man, signing Britain’s death warrant before lunch and never thinking about it twice.
To detest him is normal, yet pointless.
Hatred slides off him like water off some cheap synthetic fabric.
He is the blank-faced destroyer of joy, freedom and invention. He is death on prescription, equally distributed.
He is nameless dread, the void, the negation that cannot be negated.
He is the end of hope.

In short, I am not a fan.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

A great pandemic solution!

[Chris Littlewood @chrislittlewoo8]

I’ve been thinking about this a lot over the last few weeks.

I’ve seen people I know—some I consider friends—arrested and charged simply for stating their opinions on social media.

Here are a few conclusions I’ve come to:

1. Those in power are terrified of people who speak the truth.

They’ve employed every mechanism within the political, media, and judicial systems to demonise and punish these individuals—not because of what they did or said, but because their words and actions directly challenged the direction those in power are trying to take.

The people in power have a specific agenda, and over the last year, they’ve been losing their grip on the population.

Fewer people are paying attention to mainstream media (MSM) and the usual messaging, and more are turning to social media and citizen journalism for information that truly matters to them.

These individuals were made into public examples—punished to serve as a warning to anyone else who might dare to question authority.

The goal was to regain control, and they may believe they’ve succeeded.

2.Those arrested and charged have often received extremely poor legal advice.

Many have pleaded guilty, likely out of fear that a guilty verdict in a higher court would result in a much harsher sentence.

Others may have felt they couldn’t afford the financial burden of defending themselves in open court.

The absurd, overreaching show trials we’ve witnessed, ending in outrageous sentences, might never have happened if people had a) understood the law better, and b) had the means to mount a proper defense.

Justice is supposed to be decided by 12 jurors who weigh the evidence and reach a verdict.

In most cases, the charges would likely have been dismissed.

Believe it or not, our jury system works. That’s why they don’t want you to access it.

3.This government is attempting to terrify the population into silence through outrageous show trials and ridiculous punitive sentencing.

It might work for a very short time, but the festering resentment caused by the government’s refusal to address the fundamental issues driving the spiralling decline in community cohesion is only growing stronger.

In fact, these issues are being completely ignored.

The lack of control over immigration is putting immense strain on our society.

You can’t negotiate for a better standard of living if thousands are coming into the country willing to work for your wage or lower.

It’s a race to poverty, where only the global profiteers win.

Two-tier justice creates animosity, friction, and hatred.

We must have the same justice for all, irrespective of creed, colour, or religion—otherwise, justice becomes nothing more than a facade for political doctrine.

As a country, we must be a safe haven for those who are persecuted and provide an opportunity for them to live in a peaceful society.

We must also welcome those who can enrich, improve, and benefit our society.

However, this requires a strong defense of our borders, a comprehensive immigration and asylum control system, and a strict process for refusing entry and returning those who attempt illegal entry.

None of this is happening.

People are being arrested because they are frustrated that it isn’t happening.

Yes, we have a few citizens who deserve to be incarcerated.

But over the last 30 years, it seems we've had far more idiots in parliament.

[David Kurten @davidkurten]

Under the rules of his own regime, this man should be arrested for an inaccurate social media post.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Almost everything in our news cycle is questionable now. The lines between fact and fiction have become blurred. What our leaders and mainstream media peddle as the truth is often misinformation. And what is really the truth is smeared as misinformation. In an era of rolling news and social media, the bamboozle has captured us. In particular, our ‘elites’ masquerading their greed as virtue.

The modern world is a simulacrum, where reality has been replaced by false messaging and imagery, to such an extent that one cannot distinguish between the real and the unreal. And as a result of this, everyone squabbles through the prism of their own confirmation biases to claim what they consider to be their own truths, when actually they are blindsided by their own false superiority of sanctimony and virtue.

We are ruled by a nefarious group of individuals that have an unquenchable thirst for power, control and money, and they don’t care what they have to do to get it. And that includes tricking people into thinking they are the virtuous good guys who are here to keep us all safe. And tragically, millions of people are completely duped by this. What we have witnessed over the Covid response, the war in Ukraine, the Net Zero agenda on climate change and many other current issues is a movement of faux-virtue that has been carefully crafted by corrupt politicians, messengers within legacy media outlets, greedy corporations, messiah delusional billionaires and undemocratic technocrats to create the impression that they are the virtuous ones who are our friends.

These people are not our friends. Their primary objective is to hoodwink us into believing and complying to their virtue, but in reality being tricked into giving away more freedoms, power, wealth and assets to these virtue vultures.

The reality of all of this is that we are sleepwalking towards the biggest asset grab in the history of the planet. They are trying to destroy farms, land, businesses, freedoms, housing, individual wealth, travel and own them or sell them off to the highest bidder. And at the same time, they are trying to ring-fence society into the entrapment of being controlled by data – either through health passports or the slow mission creep towards central banking digital currencies (CBDCs). It’s a giant asset grab of what we own and control. They frame all of this being in our best interests. But it’s the biggest swindle ever.

This gargantuan virtue con-trick also comes with a huge slice of authoritarianism. Anyone who sees through it, questions it, stands up to it or shows opposition to it are immediately ridiculed and ostracised by the group-think mob:

Question the Covid response?
“Covidiot”

Question the wars?
“Putin apologist”
“Antisemite”

Question net zero?
“Climate change denier”

This is gutter politics designed to shut down and undermine any opposition or questioning.

But not questioning the narrative is a huge form of denial. Because any government, technocrat or organisation that advocates medical discrimination, suppression of civil liberties and a transfer of wealth and public assets to the rich while the rest of society endures a cost of living crisis is not your friend. Don’t be fooled by their virtue. It’s a giant con. In reality, they are indulging in a massive asset grab. They are treating the world as feudal overlords indulging in their own personal fiefdoms while us plebs are left to feed off the crumbs from their table – but all under the guise of “it’s for our own good” or “safety” while pretending to be humanistic and empathetic convincingly, along with glib charm, is the primary weapon that power hungry sociopaths use along with dogmatic zealotry.

Fake virtue peddled by governments, rulers and authorities for mass compliance and social control is oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook. Don’t be fooled by it. Don’t sleepwalk towards it. Because when totalitarianism arrives, it will come cloaked in virtue.

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

Check out the UK's hottest #craftbeer bottle shop! https://t.co/PD1JzppPhc

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

@kingtuts @86TVsband @lizziereidmusic Set times?

[Morton Club Together @TonClubTogether]

1️⃣5️⃣ Games unbeaten
4️⃣th in #cinchChamp
1️⃣/4️⃣ final of @ScottishCup
1️⃣0️⃣ pounds a month is all it takes to join us & become part of the majority sĥareholders of @Morton_FC

If ever there was a time to join MCT, it's NOW - https://t.co/RxoSddLs28

🔵⚪️🟡

[Olaf Falafel @OFalafel]

I can do it on a caretaker basis till they get someone else in

[Stuart Clark @stuc76]

@VerdantBrew Nothing here 😳

[Mercurius @Mercurius_Scot]

Benefits budget ⬆️ 48%. Income Tax rates ⬆️
Education, business support, policing & council budgets all ⬇️

Result: Scotland pays more to get less under the incompetent @theSNP

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

Rishi Sunak's family (in law) signed a $1.5 Billion deal with BP in relation to Gaza oil fields.

UK Gov have no interest in ceasefire.

Same shit with mRNA COVID vaccines.

What a coincidence...

We are ruled over by master criminals, stop supporting them, stop voting for them.

[Susan Dalgety @DalgetySusan]

These are the MSPs who voted against @RussellFindlay1 sensible amendment to make it harder for sex offenders to change their legal sex. Put simply, they put gender ideology and party loyalty ahead of the safety of women and girls.