@prvkhvr You can bomb camps and kill terrorists, but if the ideology survives, the threat will return. We need a long-term vision that targets the ideology sustaining terrorism in the subcontinent.
@prvkhvr Kinetic action brings short-term results, but if we want to end terrorism permanently, we must defeat the ideology behind it. This is not just a military fight—it's an ideological war.
@prvkhvr The ideology that divided India in 1947 is still alive. It fuels terrorism in Pakistan and Bangladesh today. If we want lasting peace, we must confront and defeat that ideology, not just its violent symptoms.
@prvkhvr Our biggest weakness is flawed threat perception. We treat symptoms (terrorism) but ignore the root cause—the ideology fueling it since 1947. Without confronting that ideology, there will never be lasting peace in the subcontinent.
@Ravisutanjani We’ve turned war coverage into a circus.Some media outlets have become nothing but clowns zero credibility, full of melodrama, false info, and war commentary that sounds more like cricket commentary. This is not journalism. It’s national embarrassment. #India#Media#WarNarrative
@ajaykraina just a tactical lapse, it’s a failure in strategic threat anticipation and asset protection.
In cybersecurity, we always say: 'If you're reacting, you're already too late.' The same applies here.
@ajaykraina What we are witnessing right now looks like a failure to apply even the basic framework of intelligence-led defense. Our adversary successfully positioned their strike assets and launched attacks—apparently without us detecting or disrupting them in time. This is not
@ajaykraina Sir, I 'm nt military expert, but I work in the field of cybersecurity, & I deeply understand how threat intelligence works.The principles are the same across domains—whether in cyberspace / d battlefield.identify your adversary’s capabilities, monitor their movements
@ajaykraina In either case, it’s unacceptable for a nation that aspires to be a regional power. Strategic security demands anticipation, not just reaction.
@ajaykraina Where was our human intelligence on the ground? What were our military satellites tracking? Either we consciously chose to let Pakistan strike first and then settle for damage control—or we are seriously lacking in counter-intelligence and real-time threat monitoring.
@ajaykraina What we witnessed yesterday morning is not just a tactical oversight—it’s a clear intelligence failure on our part. Why didn’t we detect the movement and placement of those missile systems before they struck? Why wasn’t the site destroyed when it was being prepared?
@ajaykraina Just look at yesterday morning’s attack—it clearly exposed how poorly we were prepared. They moved their military assets out in advance and positioned them near densely populated civilian areas. Then they launched their strike from there, knowing we would hesitate to
@ajaykraina Those who truly understand geopolitics know one thing clearly—this strike is not going to deter Pakistan in the future.
Deterrence doesn’t come from symbolic actions. It comes from sustained strategy, political will, and unpredictability.
@ajaykraina Launching a conventional strike without strategic clarity not only exposed our intent but also gave Pakistan a clear reason to retaliate and shift the narrative. If we act without long-term vision, we risk playing into the hands of the very forces we aim to deter.
@ajaykraina Wasn’t it a rushed decision 2 carry out a direct strike without a clearly defined goal? Why didn’t we consider indirect options—like using unknown gunmen / asymmetric tactics to teach Pakistan a lesson,especially when plausible deniability is crucial in such conflict?