@s2_underground The fact that nothing will happen from repeated incursions into NATO countries by Russian munitions is incredible to me. Russia needs more than "strong condemnation" words. Not war, but at least a limited attack on the site of origin.
@s2_underground SECDEF letting the plan slip was sloppy. Also, why do we stroke his ego and use the "SECWAR" title? It's not official or approved by Congress. Real question.
@s2_underground Absolute disaster. This administration has an under-appreciation for planning and seeking wise counsel, and an over-confidence in "but we're the best, right?"
@PALMBEACHISL@officialOHMG@TheAKGuy Let me help you out... See I don't know if that was meant to be a statement:
"Why? Because you can't read between the lines." Or a question: "Why, because you can't read between the lines?"
All the best,
Sudofacts.
@NickRicci5@WillisBrow97248@Tablesalt13@WhineNot Lol, you know the treaty of Ghent restored the original borders largely to rap American knuckles and say 1) no you can't take Canadian land, and 2) here is your occupied territory back because we don't want to deal with it... Right?
@jennAA2014@kinsellawarren According to which international law? Can you cite a statute or precedent? From which governing body? From which enforcing body?
@s2_underground UKR traitors makes sense. If Russia, then likely just pushing further and further to see how much it actually takes to trigger Article 5, and who even shows up to the party.
@annamgainey Numbers are hard for liberals, so let me put it this way: if each year I just put more on the credit card, with no plan to ever pay down the balance, I'll soon be able to help NOBODY. We actually care about people in the realm of reality.
@s2_underground Trump has always been a bit like that, but more and more he seems to just make these wild statements and then let the press secretary et. al. clean it up after. I'm sure it works in some cases, but in this one it may be far more dangerous and reckless.