AI-native product leader who deploys inside enterprise accounts, drives adoption, and unblocks production implementations, without handoffs.
Deployed PM & product builder for Agent 365 at Microsoft. I sit inside Fortune 500 and ISV partner accounts to get agentic AI from concept to compliant production, and I also build the Agent 365 SDK and CLI, so the feedback loop runs from the field back into the platform.
19+ years at Microsoft spanning software engineering, customer-embedded implementation, and platform product. Recently embedded with partners including Manus, Genspark, Zendesk, Zensai, Egnyte, Kasisto, Kore, and n8n. Before that I led Copilot extensibility (1,300+ connectors, ~20M MAU) and Dataverse.
Bellevue, WA
People are getting carried away by Elon Musk’s views on a few Indian oligarchs, treating them as an attack on India itself.
Since when did criticism of a few powerful businessmen become criticism of an entire nation?
Elon Musk is influential, no doubt.
But influence does not make every opinion an act of foreign interference.
He is expressing his views on a few Indian businessmen - just as millions on X express their views on Musk, Trump, Modi, or anyone else.
Are his views correct? That’s debatable.
They should be challenged with facts and counterarguments, not dismissed as an attack on India merely because they come from a foreigner.
That is the entire point of free speech.
Many argue that India should have its own social media platform.
Absolutely.
But what would be the point if its unwritten rule were that only pro-government views are welcome?
A platform that allows praise but discourages criticism isn't a free-speech platform.
It is just another echo chamber - or an extension of Godi media.
And let’s be clear:
India is not its government.
India is not its billionaires.
And criticism of the government or a few oligarchs is not an attack on 1.4 billion Indians.
Tomorrow, if Adani criticises Elon Musk, should Americans call it foreign interference?
Or should they simply debate whether Adani is right?
The same principle must apply both ways.
And here’s the irony.
Those who consider using X a matter of patriotism when defending India against foreign criticism should ask themselves a simple question:
If you genuinely believe Elon Musk’s platform is being used to interfere in India’s affairs, why are you still using it?
I feel that the real test of patriotism isn't defending a few powerful businessmen from criticism.
Patriotism is about having enough confidence in India to allow criticism - even when it comes from abroad.
@elonmusk@narendramodi@RahulGandhi
i built an anti-slop software factory for ~50 contributors (and all their agents), from engineering to marketing, and i am sharing everything i learned
there is a lot of discourse around software factories, and though they sound amazing in theory, in practice, it can get exponentially sloppy if you are not careful. to keep the slop out, a lot of "good practices" we learned about software development get turned on their head.
in this video:
> why i banned useState and useEffect
> why code duplication is ok
> why skills aren't enough
> how to stop slop from compounding
btw this is not sponsored, i mention a few tools we use: @trpcio (e2e typesaftey), @vercel (app router), @aidenybai (react doctor), @meticulousgabe (frontend tests), @mcpjams (MCP tests), @cursor_ai (bugbot), @useblacksmith (fast CI), @composio (agent triggers & tools)