BIG: RTI activist @AnjaliB_ says she asked @ECISVEEP under RTI to provide file details as to who and how decision to have an SIR was taken. She claims that the ECI official gave in writing that the decision was not taken by the Commission!! So who took it???
Hundreds of young women took to the streets in Delhi after a teenage girl was allegedly gang-raped in Aastha Kunj Park by three men posing as policemen. The case has exposed not just the alleged crime, but the safety gaps around one of Delhi’s largest parks, and a wider crisis.
Few things have disgusted me more than the systematic butchering of innocent civilians by the Israelis.
In this case, children hunted for fun
This isn’t the action of ‘honourable armed forces’ as claimed
There’s now overwhelming irrefutable evidence of their genocidal actions
Justitce Krishna Murari was a Supreme Court Judge when two cases against the Ambani "Vantara" were heard by him. Both case resulted in verdicts in favour of Vantara
Three years down the line...... Murari now serves as an independent voting member of Vantara’s Governing Council.
They literally took Swachh Bharat Cess from taxpayers in the name of cleaning India.
12 years later, garbage is still rotting on our roads.
So where the hell did all that money go?
Into cleaning India or cleaning Govt's image?
🚨Very concerning information coming in.
Both the CBI and ED are being pressured by the regime to raid close associates of the two Election Commissioners. Both of them are resisting pressure to hold a joint press conference with Gyanesh Kumar and unequivocally refute and trash the Indian Express report.
The same had happened to Ashok Lavasa. His family members were sent IT notices before he was pressured to resign.
This is completely unacceptable. The government has totally forgotten that this is post-Jantar Mantar India and the public cannot be fooled through such illegal and fraudulent tactics.
Archives | Gyanesh Kumar, a bureaucrat from the Kerala cadre, is known for his closeness to Amit Shah. He has played an important role in some of the Modi government’s key policy moves. When the government abrogated Article 370 of the Constitution, in August 2019, Kumar was heading the home ministry’s division for Jammu and Kashmir. He was part of the decision to devolve the former state into two union territories.
In 2020, when the government set up the Ram Janmabhoomi Teertha Kshetra, the trust meant to construct the Ram temple at Ayodhya, he oversaw all matters related to the dispute and arbitration in courts. Kumar’s final assignment was the post of secretary in the cooperation ministry, which is also headed by Shah.
Read @EramAgha's report on the taming of the Election Commission of India.
https://t.co/odrgJE1tVI
Three independent journalists reported extensively on the deaths of tribal children in Madhya Pradesh’s Balaghat.
Then they were surveilled, followed, questioned, pressured and intimidated. Eventually, their Instagram accounts vanished. @AbhishekSay
https://t.co/XbyQg27fvP
🚨IMPORTANT NEWS🚨
Since Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar is in the news, I have some very important but sad news to share about a Supreme Court judge.
Supreme Court judge Justice Satish Chandra Sharma. Just two months away from retirement.
If you remember, the Allahabad High Court had imposed a penalty on Medha Roopam, the DM of Noida and daughter of Gyanesh Kumar with a fine of five lakh rupees for irrationally issuing NSA order against a student Activist for Noida labour protest.
That order was challenged before the Supreme Court of India. Live Law, the news portal, reported that Gyanesh’s daughter’s case was listed before Justice Satish Chandra Sharma out of turn and in violation of the Supreme Court roster and rules and convention. The challenge ought to have gone before Justice Nagarathna’s bench, known to be an independent upright judge.
Two days back, when the matter was listed for hearing, Justice Sharma‘s bench switched off the audio of the Supreme Court proceeding, which is highly unusual and almost never done. ALARMING. There was no explanation from the judge’s side as to why this extraordinary favour was done for Gyanesh’s daughter.
In any case the fine and the adverse remarks of the Allahabad High Court were stayed by Justice Sharma immediately.
Same day, in another case related to Gyanesh Kumar—the constitutional challenge that was filed against the 2023 law on election commissioners of India was finally decided by a two judge bench of which Justice Sharma was a part of.
Under challenge was the appointments procedure where the leader of opposition today holds only an ornamental seat in the Three-member selection committee that selects Election commissioner of India. The other two are PM and his Cabinet Minister. Justice Sharma dissented which led to a split verdict and the case has now been sent before the Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger bench. This has delayed the case by years probably. This split verdict itself came after three years. This is how the Supreme Court refuses to hear most important cases that affect our lives and the country.
A separate blanket immunity granted to past and present election commissioners of India by Modi’s government is also pending for last 9 months before CJI Surya Kant. Today, the Chief Election Commissioner has been exposed for gross illegalities and for stealing votes and elections at the behest of powers that be. Any sane, sorted, neutral, just person can see that the selection process of ECIs is not independent and tilted in govt’s favour. But not Justice Sharma.
And here’s the big news: his son holds not one, not two, but four big, plum government counsel panels, including income, tax department, GST, customs, and excise, and a Madhya Pradesh government lawyer panel. I need not explain the great perks and influence that come along when you hold such plum government panels. Read my Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma report where I exposed the same thing.
I am withholding the name of the son for now.
The important question is: how can a judge be expected to do impartial and fair Justice in politically sensitive cases if his family members serve at the pleasure of the government? The judge is also retiring two months later, and several lawyers have informed me that there are vacancies in NCLAT and other search plum tribunals.
I’M SORRY TO SAY such a system of judiciary does not inspire confidence in its ability to do impartial justice. There is a reason why the ethics code for judges require them to maintain a sense of aloofness and not do anything which can harm the their image and that of the judiciary.
Both in Justice Swarna Kanta’s case and several other judges case, including that of the Supreme Court, it is TRAGIC to notice the complete capture of the institution of the Indian judiciary. Can the judiciary go on like this?
So it’s official now. Booth level officers have a new, special category on their apps : EC approved VIP voters.
For the rest of us non- VIPs however it’s still harassment and disenfranchisement as usual .
Electoral democracy in New India!
DELHI DELETED is LIVE on @TheRedMike
Alive people marked “DEAD.”
Voters marked “NON-TRACEABLE.”
Entire booths deleted after JJ clusters were demolished.
33 lakh voters served “Logical Discrepancy” notices.
VIP names handled at home while ordinary voters stand in queues.
Muslim voters fear being branded “Bangladeshi” if their names aren’t restored.
And blatant misuse of Form 6
Millions. One voter list. A question of democratic identity.
🎥 DELHI DELETED — Watch the full investigation on @TheRedMike YouTube.
Mamata Banerjee’s constituency:
51k votes deleted. She lost by 15k.
M.K. Stalin’s constituency:
1 lakh votes deleted. He lost by 9k.
Arvind Kejriwal’s constituency:
40k votes deleted. He lost by 4k.
Was this the real reason behind the introduction of SIR?
The boys were so, entitled, so insulated by wealth from consequence, that it never occurred to them that their acts were wrongdoings. So were their parents.
What makes this worse is that the same BMW was reportedly involved in a March 29 incident, for which an FIR was lodged at Gamdevi police station after it allegedly hit a couple while overspeeding. Police say several more e-challans were pending against the vehicle, speeding, jumping a signal, causing obstruction.
And it gets worse still. There was a second police case on August 20: Gajjar and three others were allegedly intoxicated and created a disturbance outside 145 Pub in Bandra, even arguing with and obstructing officers.
Two police cases. A pile of unpaid challans. A documented pattern of reckless, intoxicated, lawless behaviour.
Yet the license was never suspended. Yet the parents never confiscated the keys and told their sons to take the bus.
Every warning sign was there, flashing, unmissable. And at every turn, money and influence stepped in where accountability should have. The boys believed the rules didn't apply to them, because until that night, they didn't.
And so, when we come to the deaths on the coastal road, let us be honest about the word we use. A tragedy, it was not. A tragedy is fate striking the innocent, the bystander, the couple on the pavement, the family that loses someone through no fault of their own. This was no tragedy. This was a catastrophe years in the making, one the boys authored themselves, mile by reckless mile, challan by ignored challan, FIR by dismissed FIR. They were not struck down by misfortune; they were racing toward an ending their own hands had been building since March. The coastal road didn't betray them, it simply ran out of road, as it was always going to.
The real tragedy belongs to those they could have killed along the way, and to a system that watched all of it and chose, every single time, to look away.