HyperFrames -> Video Agent
Our HTML motion graphics framework, now inside HeyGen
Prompt what you want, our agent builds the entire video
Avatar, graphics, captions, music
Infinitely customizable, just ask
Comment + RT "prompt" for a free month of HeyGen (must follow)
Un canvas infini dans le disque de Poincaré pour prendre des notes — projet original qui utilise la géométrie hyperbolique pour organiser l'information autrement.
https://t.co/39Je7HAvHZ
The so-called “calculator riots” of 1986 serve as a powerful reminder that today’s anxieties about artificial intelligence replacing human thinking are far from new.
In April 1986, a determined group of math educators staged a vocal protest outside the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) annual convention in Washington, D.C. Led by influential textbook author John Saxon, demonstrators carried signs declaring, “The Button’s Nothin’ ’Til the Brain’s Trained.”
They were opposing the NCTM’s new recommendation to incorporate electronic calculators into mathematics education at every grade level, including homework and exams.
The protesters worried that reliance on calculators would erode students’ mental arithmetic skills, numerical intuition, and deep conceptual understanding, potentially creating a generation of “calcuholics” overly dependent on machines.
The NCTM countered that calculators would free students from repetitive, low-level calculations, enabling them to tackle more complex problem-solving and higher-order thinking. Ultimately, the debate led to a pragmatic compromise: students would first master core mathematical concepts and mental strategies before using calculators as tools for more advanced work.
This balanced approach allowed technology to enhance, rather than replace, mathematical reasoning.
Today, as schools navigate the rapid rise of generative AI, the 1986 calculator compromise offers a valuable blueprint: prioritize genuine understanding first, then thoughtfully integrate powerful new tools.
@Rainmaker1973 China has never experienced such calculator riots. Although there are curriculums that teach the use of calculators, they are absolutely prohibited in exams. Whether it's teachers, parents, or students, the emphasis on mental and written arithmetic skills remains extremely high.
If the math curriculum Illustrative Mathematics (aka Kiddom, etc) is doing so well, why was Gates Foundation granting them $15M last July 2025? ChatGPT says Gates has put $36M into it since 2012. Just call it "Gates Mathematics" at this point.