🚨 A trader’s payout was allegedly rejected for “copy trading”, no proof provided.
@fundingurtrades
He kept trading.
Then for the next payout, he claims he was asked to record a video praising the firm and leave positive reviews before receiving his funds from @fundingurtrades
He complied.
Later, another payout request was reportedly denied over an “IP breach.” Again, when proof was requested, communication allegedly stopped.
If these claims are false, @fundingurtrades should publicly clarify them with evidence.
If they’re true, traders deserve answers:
• Why was trading allowed to continue after the first violation?
• Why request promotional content from a trader waiting for a payout?
• Where is the proof for the copy trading and IP breach accusations?
• Why go silent when evidence is requested?
Meanwhile, 50% OFF promotions and multi-account offers keep rolling out.
Transparency shouldn’t only exist in marketing. It should exist when payouts are on the line.
🚨 A trader’s payout was allegedly rejected for “copy trading”, no proof provided.
@fundingurtrades
He kept trading.
Then for the next payout, he claims he was asked to record a video praising the firm and leave positive reviews before receiving his funds from @fundingurtrades
He complied.
Later, another payout request was reportedly denied over an “IP breach.” Again, when proof was requested, communication allegedly stopped.
If these claims are false, @fundingurtrades should publicly clarify them with evidence.
If they’re true, traders deserve answers:
• Why was trading allowed to continue after the first violation?
• Why request promotional content from a trader waiting for a payout?
• Where is the proof for the copy trading and IP breach accusations?
• Why go silent when evidence is requested?
Meanwhile, 50% OFF promotions and multi-account offers keep rolling out.
Transparency shouldn’t only exist in marketing. It should exist when payouts are on the line.
🚨 A trader’s payout was allegedly rejected for “copy trading”, no proof provided.
@fundingurtrades
He kept trading.
Then for the next payout, he claims he was asked to record a video praising the firm and leave positive reviews before receiving his funds from @fundingurtrades
He complied.
Later, another payout request was reportedly denied over an “IP breach.” Again, when proof was requested, communication allegedly stopped.
If these claims are false, @fundingurtrades should publicly clarify them with evidence.
If they’re true, traders deserve answers:
• Why was trading allowed to continue after the first violation?
• Why request promotional content from a trader waiting for a payout?
• Where is the proof for the copy trading and IP breach accusations?
• Why go silent when evidence is requested?
Meanwhile, 50% OFF promotions and multi-account offers keep rolling out.
Transparency shouldn’t only exist in marketing. It should exist when payouts are on the line.
🚨 Serious questions need to be answered by @fundexgg
A trader has shared evidence showing that a $100K account which was reportedly not profitable was still able to generate:
✅ Phase 1 Certificate
✅ Phase 2 Certificate
✅ Live / Payout Certificate
If these documents can be generated on accounts that did not genuinely pass, then the industry deserves an explanation.
Some simple questions:
• How are these certificates being generated?
• What verification process exists before issuing them?
• Can anyone generate these certificates regardless of account performance?
• How many certificates shared by influencers and affiliates are actually backed by real trading results?
If the evidence is accurate, this is not a minor issue.
Certificates and payout proofs are used to build trust. If those documents can be created without meeting the required conditions, traders are being misled.
We invite @fundexgg to publicly address these concerns and provide a clear explanation to the community.
The industry deserves transparency.
🚨 GOATFUNDED GIVEAWAY ALERT! 🚨
$1.7M in payouts distributed in May alone! 💰
To celebrate this incredible milestone, we're giving away:
🎁 3 × $15,000 Funded Accounts 💰 $45,000 Total Giveaway Value
Thanks to @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal for giving this massive opportunity to our community.
Rules are simple:
✅ Follow @trustedprophub & @support_tph
✅ Follow @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal
✅ Join our Discord – https://t.co/AoTdvc8ih3
✅ Join Goatfunded Discord - https://t.co/Fz3ZodeEQx
✅ Complete all tasks
✅ Drop screenshots in the comments
This is a massive opportunity for traders looking to get funded. Make sure you participate and don't miss your chance to win a $15,000 funded account.
🔥 Winners will be announced soon. Let's goo! 🚀🏆
🚨 GOATFUNDED GIVEAWAY ALERT! 🚨
$1.7M in payouts distributed in May alone! 💰
To celebrate this incredible milestone, we're giving away:
🎁 3 × $15,000 Funded Accounts 💰 $45,000 Total Giveaway Value
Thanks to @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal for giving this massive opportunity to our community.
Rules are simple:
✅ Follow @trustedprophub & @support_tph
✅ Follow @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal
✅ Join our Discord – https://t.co/vtlUfXXpRR
✅ Join Goatfunded Discord - https://t.co/xr4WLFbkka
✅ Complete all tasks
✅ Drop screenshots in the comments
This is a massive opportunity for traders looking to get funded. Make sure you participate and don't miss your chance to win a $15,000 funded account.
🔥 Winners will be announced soon. Let's goo! 🚀🏆
🚨 GOATFUNDED GIVEAWAY ALERT! 🚨
$1.7M in payouts distributed in May alone! 💰
To celebrate this incredible milestone, we're giving away:
🎁 3 × $15,000 Funded Accounts 💰 $45,000 Total Giveaway Value
Thanks to @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal for giving this massive opportunity to our community.
Rules are simple:
✅ Follow @trustedprophub & @support_tph
✅ Follow @GoatFunded & @EdwardXLreal
✅ Join our Discord – https://t.co/AoTdvc8ih3
✅ Join Goatfunded Discord - https://t.co/Fz3ZodeEQx
✅ Complete all tasks
✅ Drop screenshots in the comments
This is a massive opportunity for traders looking to get funded. Make sure you participate and don't miss your chance to win a $15,000 funded account.
🔥 Winners will be announced soon. Let's goo! 🚀🏆
$12.2M paid out in May alone 👀
@fundingpips continues to set the benchmark in the prop industry, reporting over $12.2 million in trader rewards during May 2026 and more than $255+ million paid since launch.
In an industry where trust is everything, consistent payouts, fast processing, and transparent communication are what truly matter.
Respect to CEO @Khldfx and the entire FundingPips team for building a firm that has earned the confidence of traders worldwide through execution rather than promises.
A remarkable milestone for both the firm and the prop trading industry. 👏
🚨 BREAKING: Another payout dispute in the prop firm industry.
@harypips claims that after receiving two payouts from @BlueGuardiancom , his account was breached when he requested his third payout. According to him, the firm introduced a "CID" violation and rejected the payout without providing proof that his trades matched another trader's activity.
@seanbaint CEO of BLUEGUARDIAN publicly responded, stating that the trader logged into other customers' accounts from his device and that the ban was justified under the firm's rules. The CEO also argued that the payout amount was too small for the firm to risk its reputation over.
The community appears divided:
• Some traders are asking why someone would access other traders' accounts in the first place.
• Others believe firms have the right to enforce account-sharing policies if evidence exists.
• Some are questioning whether simply using the same laptop or device as another trader should be enough to trigger a breach.
At the moment, both sides are telling very different stories.
What do you think?
Should firms provide concrete evidence when rejecting payouts, or is device/account-sharing detection enough on its own? 👇
🚨 BREAKING: Another payout dispute in the prop firm industry.
@harypips claims that after receiving two payouts from @BlueGuardiancom , his account was breached when he requested his third payout. According to him, the firm introduced a "CID" violation and rejected the payout without providing proof that his trades matched another trader's activity.
@seanbaint CEO of BLUEGUARDIAN publicly responded, stating that the trader logged into other customers' accounts from his device and that the ban was justified under the firm's rules. The CEO also argued that the payout amount was too small for the firm to risk its reputation over.
The community appears divided:
• Some traders are asking why someone would access other traders' accounts in the first place.
• Others believe firms have the right to enforce account-sharing policies if evidence exists.
• Some are questioning whether simply using the same laptop or device as another trader should be enough to trigger a breach.
At the moment, both sides are telling very different stories.
What do you think?
Should firms provide concrete evidence when rejecting payouts, or is device/account-sharing detection enough on its own? 👇
$11M+ Paid Out. 🚨
A strong milestone by @EquityEdgeUK, with over $11 million distributed to traders worldwide.
Consistent payouts build trust, and trust is what every trader looks for in a prop firm.
Congratulations to @berkayglife & the entire Equity Edge team on this achievement. Wishing you continued growth and even bigger milestones ahead. 🚀
Your name could be on the next payout!
$11M+ Paid Out. 🚨
A strong milestone by @EquityEdgeUK, with over $11 million distributed to traders worldwide.
Consistent payouts build trust, and trust is what every trader looks for in a prop firm.
Congratulations to @berkayglife & the entire Equity Edge team on this achievement. Wishing you continued growth and even bigger milestones ahead. 🚀
Your name could be on the next payout!
🚨 Serious Question for @HolaPrimeGlobal@Somesh_HP
You spent months running Urdu ads and targeting Pakistani traders across social media. Thousands of traders were welcomed when their money was needed.
Then suddenly new Pakistani clients could no longer buy challenges, with no clear public announcement beforehand.
Now the explanation is “regulatory restrictions.”
Fair enough. Regulations can change.
But why was there no transparent announcement before traders started facing errors on the dashboard? Why did traders have to find out through support tickets and failed purchases?
If a firm can aggressively market to a region, it should also communicate openly when that region is no longer accepted.
This isn’t just about Pakistan. It’s about transparency, communication, and trust.
Traders deserve clear updates, not surprises.
@HolaPrimeGlobal, do you think this was handled professionally? 🤔
#TrustedPropHub 🚨
Big news at @BemFunding 🚨
Get funded in as little as 1 day with a streamlined one-step challenge.
No consistency rule, no minimum trading days, no weekend holding restrictions, and payouts available on demand.
Built for traders who want flexibility without unnecessary limitations. 🚀
More than $1.7M paid out in May 🚨
@GFFutures alone accounted for over $300K in trader payouts, pushing the @GoatFunded ecosystem beyond the $2M mark.
Also, credit where it’s due, big respect to @EdwardXLreal and the entire GOAT team for continuing to scale while delivering for their traders. 👏
The numbers speak for themselves. 🔥
More than $1.7M paid out in May 🚨
@GFFutures alone accounted for over $300K in trader payouts, pushing the @GoatFunded ecosystem beyond the $2M mark.
Also, credit where it’s due, big respect to @EdwardXLreal and the entire GOAT team for continuing to scale while delivering for their traders. 👏
The numbers speak for themselves. 🔥
The prop industry has become crowded with pages that appear overnight, call themselves "PROPFIRMS EXPOSERS" and start attacking firms without doing even the most basic verification.
A trader posts a complaint and within minutes they become judge, jury, and executioner. No verification, no discussion with the firm, no investigation just a quick post to farm impressions and followers.
Exposing a firm is easy. Resolving a trader's issue is the hard part.
Before trusting any page, ask them how many cases they've actually helped resolve.
Not how many posts they've made. Not how many firms they've attacked.
How many traders have they genuinely helped?
The prop industry already has enough noise.
What traders need are people who can verify facts, speak with firms, and push for real solutions.
@trustedprophub has never been about engagement farming. We hear both sides, verify information, and work directly with firms whenever possible to help traders get answers and resolutions.
Don't confuse loud pages with useful pages.
There's a big difference.
#TrustedPropHub 🚨
🚨 Your Payout has been Rejected! ❌
@theshriofficial Raises Serious Concerns Regarding @FunderPro
A trader has reported that his $8,888 payout request was denied after nearly two months of appeals, follow-ups, and communication with the firm.
What makes this case noteworthy is that the trader has successfully withdrawn more than $80,000 from several other prop firms, making this outcome difficult for him to understand.
The trader also claims that he has spoken with other traders who have experienced similar payout-related issues, raising further questions about consistency and transparency.
Prop traders dedicate significant time, effort, and capital to meet a firm's requirements. When a payout is denied, traders deserve a clear explanation backed by transparent reasoning.
For the health of the industry, concerns like these should be addressed openly and professionally.
@FunderPro, the trading community would appreciate greater clarity regarding this case.