SurfXL

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@dragomaxxer That white t-shirt guy should be fired immediately from his job.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@patel41176 @NewsAlgebraIND Haan jaise ki leave k liye employees kabhi jhut bolte hi nhi😆

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@choga_don Dipke, please quit being such a bootlicker.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@labstamil First of all CJP not asking for NEET ban.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@vignesh_1718 @beemji This man must be the most opportunistic person in the nation because he will bring up caste and brainwash the state's youth in the name of oppression even when no one is being oppressed.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@0lum1d3 @FullRetardRadar Typical African immigrant behaviour, always promoting violence and rape culture wherever they go.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Cjsavage696969 100% BS.😆😆😆

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@scottm2032 @GymFiesta @GoalLoaded How old do you think he is?

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj you finally reached the point everyone else started from. “Not everything comes under personal freedom.” Exactly. The only disagreement is that you arbitrarily decided making out in someone else’s cab is “allowed.” The owner disagreed. That’s called boundaries, not oppression.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj Your argument gets funnier with every reply. First it was jealousy, then crime, then parks, then public urination, now “everyone should accept everything.” That’s not debating, that’s speedrunning logical fallacies.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj “Paid for the space.” You rented a ride, not a temporary kingdom. That’s like saying buying a movie ticket lets you shout through the whole film because you paid.😆

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj So by your logic, as long as I don’t damage your property, I can behave however I want inside it? Eat smelly food, blast music, clip my nails, smoke, or change clothes you can’t object because “no damage,” right? That’s not personal freedom; that’s entitlement.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj Thanks for proving my point. You just admitted not everything done in public is acceptable. So the real question isn’t “Is it love?” it’s where and whether the owner is okay with it. Welcome to the argument you’ve been denying.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj 😂 Every reply is the same script: crime, jealousy, broken society. You still can’t answer one basic question does a cab owner have the right to set rules inside his cab? Philosophy won’t save a weak argument.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj Your reading comprehension is on life support. Nobody said “love shouldn’t be public.” The point is simple: your freedom ends where someone else’s property rights begin.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj The issue isn’t your “love.” It’s your inability to understand that someone else’s cab isn’t your private room. That’s a lesson most people learn as children.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj Your logic is fascinating. Property rights disappear as long as there’s no physical damage? Please never complain when someone treats your belongings like a public lounge.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj You’ve mentioned murder, corruption, looting and abusive drivers, yet still haven’t answered one question. Does a passenger have the right to ignore the driver’s boundaries in his own cab? Everything else is just whataboutism.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@Op_HIT_4_IND @Ragepkj So respecting someone’s private property is “jealousy” now? A cab is for transportation, not a private bedroom. If the driver isn’t comfortable, he has every right to refuse.

[SurfXL @surf9431]

@clashreport Once a politician always politician.