Suzyvibes

Embracing the fun, truth, and positivity of life! Here for change and growth, I support the freedom X provides to express and connect.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@AmericaPapaBear Are u married? If you are your wife should divorce you for being so stupid. No one is defending a murderer. If there’s proof she committed the crime it’s easy. Problem is there’s not.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@ginamilan_ Did she tho…..

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@OnlyinFlorida2 Reasonable doubt isn’t saying she’s innocent. It’s asking what was actually proven. No eyewitness, no video, no usable prints identifying her, major investigative gaps, and later accounts from someone whose memory was fuzzy and who had been informed what happened. Where’s proof?

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@ginamilan_ Reasonable doubt isn’t saying she’s innocent. It’s asking what was actually proven. No eyewitness, no video, no usable prints identifying her, major investigative gaps, and later accounts from someone whose memory was fuzzy and who had been informed what happened. Proof?

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@AmericaPapaBear She should only serve time if she did the crime. There’s no proof though that she did it. No investigation creates a mystery (doubt) she didn’t admit to the crime. Even prosecutors said she was informed.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Simply_Shula Maybe some nut jobs are doing that. I watched the trial and there is no proof she even committed the trial. If she did it, mental illness or not she deserves life but I haven’t seen proof she did it

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Liz_Wheeler What’s the proof she did the crime? There’s no argument she was mentally ill but there hasn’t been any proof. Don’t say she admitted to it because she didn’t even prosecutors say she was informed. If she did do it she deserves the time/life but there’s no proof

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@603jeepgirl @GuntherEagleman Not if you watched the entire trial. Then you’d understand

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@GuntherEaglemeg Did she though? Watch the entirety of the trial and you’ll understand.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@TrinityMustache If there’s evidence she did the crime- then it would be a quick conviction. Problem is, there wasn’t a proper investigation, she never admitted, she was informed of the crime and prosecutors couldn’t provide any evidence towards her committing the crime

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@DisrespectedThe Imagine watching the trial and knowing they didn’t provide any evidence she committed a crime, she didn’t admit, she was informed and they didn’t do any investigation just took husbands word for it. The questions people have are legit. If she did the crime she deserve time.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@rickdanna4719 Watch the trial. If you did then you’d see that she never admitted to any crime AND prosecution never provided any evidence that she did.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@realJennaEllis She didn’t admit to any crime, she was informed she did it. If you watch the entire trial u will see they didn’t provide any evidence she did the crime.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Kentuckygirl1 Did you watch the trial? Or just listen to news? She never admitted. Even prosecuters admitted she was informed

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Emilyaustin They didn’t prove that in court

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@MarindaVannoy1 If she did the crime but problem is- if you watched the trial- there’s no evidence at all that she did. Prosecution said she didn’t admit but was informed of the crime she did

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Jillie_Alexis She didn’t admit that. Watch the trial then get back to us

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Shawn_Farash She didn’t admit

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@GuntherEagleman She didn’t admit. If you watch the trial- she was informed…..prosecution admitted that.

[Suzyvibes @suzyvibes]

@Kentuckygirl1 Did you watch the trial? Did she research those titles? From what device? What time….. when she was at the doctors with her son? U clearly didn’t watch the trial