Most people think directions are just geography…
But in Sanatan Dharma... every direction was believed to hold a divine energy!!!
From Indra ruling the East…to Varuna governing the cosmic waters…to Kubera guarding abundance.
The ancient sages imagined the universe as a living, conscious system protected by celestial forces called the Dikpalas.
These were not just gods of mythology…they symbolized balance, order, protection, karma, fire, wisdom, and cosmic harmony itself.
Maybe our ancestors weren't "primitive" at all...
Maybe they simply saw the universe differently.
Six Directions. One Divine Order.
Which Dikpala fascinates you the most?🕉️🙏🏾🌺
आपका स्वयं पर कितना नियंत्रण है और आप अपने मन में उठने वाले विचारों को कितना संभाल पाते हैं इसी पर आपका भविष्य निर्भर करता है!
'भगवान बुद्ध'
💫🌿GOOD MORNING EVERYONE🌿💫
रात के 2 बजे, भाजपा कार्यकर्ता मुख्यमंत्री सुवेंदु अधिकारी से उनके घर जाते समय मिलने के लिए कई जगहों पर कतार में खड़े थे।
वे सभी उत्साहित और खुश थे, लेकिन साथ ही इस बात से चिंतित भी थे कि मुख्यमंत्री बनने के बाद दादा उन्हें भूल जाएंगे।
फिर भी दादा ने अपना काफिला रोककर सभी से मुलाकात की।🔥
शपथ ग्रहण के बाद नंगे पैर सीधा मां काली के मंदिर में
हर रात की सुबह होती है बंगाल ने वो दिन भी देखें हैं जहां मां काली की प्रतिमा पुलिस उठा ले जाती थी..!!
रूह काँप जाये ममता बनर्जी के कृत्य सुनकर-
इतनी क्रूरता तो अंग्रेजो ने भी नहीं किया था जितना अखिलेश की दीदी ममता ने किया है।
बात पहले की है ममता बनर्जी अपने काफिले के साथ भीड़ से निकल रही थी एक उत्साहित हिन्दू ने जय श्रीराम का नारा लगा दिया।
नारा लगाते ही ममता ने काफिला रोका और भड़क गयी और जय श्रीराम बोलने वाले हिन्दुओं को जेल भेजकर पुलिस से खूब पिटवाया।
यहाँ तक स्थानीय TMC के मुस्लिम कार्यकर्ताओं ने जय श्री राम बोलने वाले हिन्दुओं के परिजनों को बुजुर्गों महिलाओं को पीटा घर में घुसकर तोड़फोड़ किया।
फिर क्या था बंगाल में जय श्री राम बोलना अपराध बन गया था हजारों लोग जय श्री राम बोलने की वजह से जेल गये।
सैकड़ों हत्या इस वज़ह से हुई कि उसने जय श्री राम बोल दिया। मुस्लिम क्षेत्र के मंदिरों पर ताले लगा दिये गए।
मंदिरों पर ताले लगने के बाद हिन्दू कोर्ट गये कोर्ट ने कहा मंदिर खोला जाये पर मुख्यमंत्री ममता के दबाव में पुलिस ने मंदिर नहीं खोले। कहा शांति व्यवस्था बिगड़ सकती है।
मस्जिदों का निर्माण तेजी से सुरु हो गया क्योंकि हर बार ममता सरकार ने सबसे बड़ा बजट मुस्लिमों को दिया।
हालत ये हो गयी कि हिन्दू अपने घरों में तेज आवाज में संख घंटा भी नहीं बजा सकता, क्योंकि मुस्लिम घर में घुसकर मारने लगे!
संदेश खाली जैसी जगहों पर हिंदुओं की बहन बेटियों और बहू को टीएमसी के मुस्लिम गुंडे आकर चिन्हित करते थे कि यह बहुत खूबसूरत है रात में भेज देना।
याद रखना जो नेता ममता के ज्यादा करीबी है वह ममता की तरह कट्टर हिन्दू विरोधी है। 😊
Police were checking vehicles on the road.
But they were only stopping men and letting all the girls go.
This shows how biased India is toward women.
Women are given special treatment in everything.
How is this okay?
Amazing Darshan of Pawanputra Hanuman
Jai Bajrang Bali
🚩
J
A
I
B
A
J
R
A
N
G
B
A
L
I
J
A
I
B
A
J
R
A
N
G
B
A
L
I
J
A
I
B
A
J
R
A
N
G
B
A
L
I
J
A
I
B
A
J
R
A
N
G
B
A
L
I
J
A
I
B
A
J
R
A
N
G
B
A
L
I
🚩Bajrang Balaji, chant your rosary, Ramdoot Hanuman, I have great faith in you @grok
The rarest object type in the universe isn't black holes. It's us. Conscious matter. The flame of life.
We have a duty to expand it in scope and scale in order to preserve it.
ANNOUNCEMENT: WE’RE SAVING SCIENCE!
We’re often told that science is “self-correcting.”
But that’s not really true.
Science doesn’t correct itself like a thermostat adjusting the temperature in your house. Science is a human institution run by human beings. And human beings are vulnerable to career incentives, groupthink, moral fads, political pressure, and fear.
And when those forces capture academic journals, peer review stops being a filter for bad ideas and starts becoming more of a credentialing system for fashionable nonsense.
This isn’t exactly new.
In 1996, the physicist Alan Sokal managed to publish a totally gibberish article in the journal Social Text full of trendy postmodern jargon. His point was simple: if you flatter the ideological commitments of certain academic editors, nonsense can pass as real scholarship.
Two decades later, @ConceptualJames, @HPluckrose , and @peterboghossian pulled off the “grievance studies” hoax, placing over a half dozen absurd papers in peer-reviewed journals. One paper used dog parks to analyze rape culture and queer performativity. Another rewrote parts of Mein Kampf in the language of feminist theory.
The problem wasn’t just that fake papers got published. It was that they were completely indistinguishable from the real thing.
And today, the problem is even worse.
We now have serious SCIENCE journals publishing papers about feminist lesbians marrying brine shrimp. We have disturbing papers that aim to “queer” and sexualize infants. We have scholarship on “lesbian-queer-trans-canine relationalities” and “trans-dog intimacies.”
But while Clown World papers are concerning because it makes a complete mockery of academia, the same broken, ideologically captured system is also publishing research in legitimate science and medical journals that pushes sex and gender pseudoscience, relies on deeply flawed data, and influences policies on the medical transition of children and young adults.
That’s not funny. That affects real people. It affects medicine. It affects law. It affects children.
And when critics try to respond, they often discover there’s no serious mechanism for correction. Submitted Letters to the Editor often go completely ignored. Contrary evidence is rejected without comment. As a result, the best critiques are often relegated to personal blog posts, social media threads, or newspaper op-eds, while the original paper remains in the literature wearing the armor of “peer review.”
That is untenable.
So Kevin McCaffree, editor-in-chief of Theory and Society (@Theory_Society), and I decided to do something about it.
Today, in the Wall Street Journal, we announced a first-of-its-kind article type called “Peer Review.”
The idea is simple: publication should be the beginning of academic scrutiny, not the end of it.
A Peer Review article can critique a paper from any scholarly journal. It can address problems with methods, evidence, logic, definitions, theory, or interpretation. But it has to focus on the claims and arguments, not personal attacks.
Submissions are capped at 2,500 words and go through a straightforward merit review instead of endless gatekeeping and ideological screening. We ask just one basic question: Is this critique coherent, serious, reasonable, or even popular enough to deserve scholarly attention?
If yes, it gets published.
And the authors of the original paper get a built-in right of reply, so readers can see the critique and the response in a legitimate academic venue.
That’s how science is supposed to work.
Science becomes self-correcting only when real people build the mechanisms that allow correction to happen.
That’s what we’ve done.
Now it’s time for academics to use it.
Read our announcement on the @WSJ below.
🔗https://t.co/gqkDE7aaDC
Next will be writing the inference stack in C for simultaneous high-speed RL across a large block of GB300s.
(We do use a little C++ tbh, but not much)
SpaceX has almost finished writing V1.0 of an in-house AI training stack in C that exact-maps to 220k GB300s with 800G NICs, making heavy use of pipeline parallelism and getting as close to bare metal as possible.
The potential speed improvement vs JAX for large training runs is over an order of magnitude.