@est_MCMLXXVIII@atrupar I love the way people just decide there and then that โno-oneโ can argue with their point of view and expect everyone to agree with them.
@SpillTheTeaLou@LiamPatterson6 But he never placed a bet before the original match. He placed it on the day of the rearranged match. There would be NO reason to cancel that leg of the bet.
@LiamPatterson6 Well done - exactly as I said earlier! The bet was placed on 31st. How could your Dad have been betting on the abandoned match which took place a day earlier?
@LiamPatterson6@Wrecknruin11 Surely then thatโs the removal of all doubt! Your Dad could not have been betting on the match on the 30th. The receipt confirms that,
@Wrecknruin11@LiamPatterson6 I donโt understand why if the receipt for the bet shows the rearranged match, not the original. When was the bet placed? Was it before or after the original abandoned match?
@RetroRobson@andrewhesselden Exactly that! Unfortunately there remains idiots like Susan still peddling the same nonsense! The difference between having an Irish passport and a UK one is significant.