@AndyBurnhamGM You're The Shapeshifter General and now you will have to spell out in specific policy terms what your characteristically vacuous 'change' & 'hope' slogans actually mean. You will crash and burn very quickly I suspect. Charlatans like you get found out.
The real racists are those on the New Authoritarian Left who have racialised our politics on the bogus claim that ethnic minorities in UK/the West are discriminated against. REform has never been a 'racist' party, never advocated that Brits of ethnic minority background be treated in anyway differently legally, politically. It's the contemporary Left that are working for a 2 tier, neo-apartheid society as the Henry Nowak murder self-evidently demonstrated.
@AngelaRayner@AndyBurnhamGM Would you and The Shapeshifter General care to define 'hope' and 'change' in specific policy terms? Time for you neo-Left charlatans to put your money where your mouths are. Or, rather our money! You're living on politically borrowed time.
The moment you become PM you will revert to your shapeshifting Blairite roots. All your vague, 'I'll just ignore the money markets' BS will go out the window and the neo-leftists you have duped into supporting you will feel like mugs. On top of that, the British people collectively will come to see just how third rate you are; you couldn't even tell Victoria Derbyshire what the OBR's fiscal rules are. You'll then be the first PM since Arthur Balfour in North Manchester to lose his seat in a general election. You heard it here first.
Good luck Rob. We need you in Westminster. If, sadly, The Shapeshifter-in-Chief does win, please stand again at the general election. You'll definately get him the second time once the good people of Wigan fully appreciate what a Blairite, forked-tongue charlatan he is. He'll be the first PM since Arthur Balfour in North Manchester 1906 to lose his own seat. What a glorious scalp that'll be.
The neo-Left is dead and you know it, regardless of whether or not The Shapeshifter-in-Chief wins in Wigan today. You're all living politically on borrowed time. The moment Burnham becomes PM he will ditch all his vaguely expressed soft Left, 'we'll just ignore the markets' nonsense. He'll leave you and his other neo-Left backers looking like sad mugs. He'll revert to his natural Blairite/Starmerist politics faster than you can say Ramsay McDonald.
In a democracy it is healthy that different viewpoints are expressed honestly and robustly. The mantra of 'unity' is often employed by closet authoritarians to try and suppress the articulation of beliefs that they find inconvenient. Today, it is the Left, with some honourable exceptions, who are the real threat to Britain's democratic values.
@StephenMorganMP Your threat sounds somewhat neo-fascistic in tone. It's now obvious that the contemporary Left are determined to restrict debate on the issues that you fear opposition in relation to. Your scare tactics don't intimidate us. We will not be silenced by your authoritarian threats.
Your an embarrassment to yourself and your party equating Reform with Nazism. Have the courage to justify this pathetic claim; list the key characteristics such as support for the creation of a one party state, the mass extermination of Jewish people, among other criteria, that enable you to make this sordid claim. bet you won't do so, coward. Anyway, you will lose your seat at the next election.
Talking of free speech, are you not the former minister who wanted to introduce a law that would have criminalied parents and psychotherapists who would have counselled children/clients not to go through with sex change procedures (not that anyone can, in reality, of course actually change sex) under the guise of banning 'LGBT conversion therapy'? Only a highly authoritarian person would embrace such a terrible policy in a supposed democracy. So, you want the State to ban, punish private consenting conversations am I right?
What has Farage done in relation to what? If a maniac decides to murder someone they are soley responsible for their terrible actions as he/she possesses moral agency. No one else can be held responsible otherwise the whole basis of the legal system would collapse as those guilty of terrible crimes could always blame others for their own decisions.
Let's get this right: you claim to believe in free speech yet also argue that the Oxford Union should ban anyone you so happen to disapprove of as this may cause local inconvenience. So, if, say, the OU invited someone you approved of but whom a group of thugs wanted blocked from speaking you presumably, rightly, would argue that there should be no "hecklers' veto" and the meeting should proceed. In reality, you're a two-faced, "heads I win, tails you lose" authoritarian who doesn't have the courage, integrity to own your illiberal politics.
@ReemAmirIbrahim Well said. Authoritarians never miss an opportunity to justify yet more State control over what we can communicate. The quite ghastly Liz Kendall epitomises the New Labour banality of evil.
You and others on the New Authorqitarian Left are using the excuse of 'protecting the kiddies' to establish your post democratic, anti liberal state. Hence ID cards, the rosion of trial by jury, the drive to unaccountable EU governance, ever more censorship under the guise of fighting 'hate speech'. We know your game!
Nazis are not 'right wing'; they are a Third Way fusion of different and sinister ideological tendencies, including some which are left-wing and anti free market. Many people who label those who resist the contemporary Left as 'Nazi' and 'fascist' actually have a lot in common with these anti liberal tendencies. They should take a good look in the mirror.
The real aim and outcome of this new social media prohibitionism is to regulate still further what adults can view. The New Authoritarian Left are putting in place, together with 2 tier 'justice', the erosion of trial by jury, the drive to get us back under EU control, the architecture of an illiberal/post-democratic state.
📱There's no such thing as a social media ban for under-16s
It means we will ALL face a “papers, please” demand to get online.
Holding platforms to account and giving parents the tools they need are the answer for child safety - not government-issued bans and digital ID checks for all.
So let's get this right: you are calling someone who opposes state control of what we can communicate a 'fascist' and you, as someone who supports extensive state regulation of the exchange of ideas and images, are not a 'fascist'? Of course the New Authoritarian Left wants to dictate, like all totalitarians throughout history have, the ideaological environment young people inhabit. I know who the REAL fascists ate today.