@TheParkheadF Love this stuff, we signed him as a raw 21 year old, he is now a much better 25 year old. Aye, yer average Celtic supporter would have been happy to give the lad 3/4 years playing for us to develop his game. 🤣
@CraigHouston_ Low IQ, low self esteem, maybe one day you will find something worthwhile to do, but right now your life has been one failure after another. You havent one ounce of moral fibre in your body.
@celticCSL director Brian McLaughlin sat down with Peter Martin @PLZSoccer on the Celtic Paradox: the £77m question, the missing strategic plan, and why this gets won in the boardroom.
"You can have £77 million in the bank, but if you've not got a plan as to what you're going to do with that money, that's not a good place to be."
"Boards don't sack themselves. Boards are changed through governance."
The Paradox is a governance case built entirely from Celtic's own audited accounts. On the 12-point framework in the paper, Celtic scores 1.2 out of 5. The peer group averages 4.1. That gap costs nothing to close.
"Ignore us at your peril, but we're not going away."
Watch: https://t.co/wdK9N1y3Rp
Read the full paper at https://t.co/wc3LbVYuSp
Join CSL: https://t.co/OKQeleSCRa
@ND_1888@CelticReport_ They are all mercenaries, very few have loyalty these days. Losing the title last year is definitely one to pay attention to, but you also have to recognise two titles at two clubs as well.
The test of whether a man is reasoning or rationalising is simple. Show him two pieces of evidence pointing in opposite directions. Watch which one he treats as proof and which one he treats as noise.
Last night was that test, played out in real time, in front of every viewer in the country. Two incidents in the same match. The same standard of evidence on the replay. One treated as outrage. One treated as if it never happened. The footage did not pick a side. The men describing it did.
A fact chosen to win an argument has stopped being a fact. It is a prop. And the moment a man starts selecting his evidence by outcome, he is no longer analysing anything. He is defending a verdict he reached before he sat down.
There are only two explanations. He cannot see the contradiction, which is incompetence. Or he can, and is hoping you can’t, which is bias. Neither flatters him. Both have been on display for years. Last night just made the costume slip.
The replay closes the question of the penalty. The reaction closes the question of the men paid to comment on it.
@grahamruthven Fair enough to debate whether the laws need to be changed, but the law supports that being given as a penalty. Also fair to seek improvements to VAR in Scotland. Clubs need to invest in it rather than run away from it. Otherwise we are a football backwater.
@johnwalker_1986 Fair comment, by all means look at that, seems proportionate to the offence. Which is distinctly different from the ridiculous reaction to the decision from people who should know better. Current laws = penalty.