TBONE585

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

James Talarico's team is now forcing him to eat meat in front of reporters "proving he's Texas tough"

He looks like he wants to puke

[Seth Keshel @RealSKeshel]

When the Supreme Court bans the counting of late-arriving mail ballots (and they almost certainly will) by the end of this month, the ramifications will be sweeping and instantly felt, especially in states like CA, OR, WA, and NV, which have mastered mail fraud.

For instance, Dems are counting on a 48-4 House split in CA with their new map. They can get it and STILL miss the House majority as the maps stand today.

If they get 46-6 or 44-8, they suffer devastating losses and if the latter perhaps odds below 20% to take the majority. Other seats like NV-3 may become playable, too.

It remains a terrible thing to watch but California’s open treason has created the greatest demand for ripping up election corruption by its roots since the 2022 races in Arizona - if not the 2020 election itself.

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@WesternLensman What an insufferable turd

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@SteveRandom Ok cuck https://t.co/7dlYbAix6P

[Jennifer Callahan @jenlynncallahan]

Wildest takeaways from my time at the Ballot Processing Center today.

✍🏻 Signatures only need to be 40% accurate (!) this is the setting the machines are set at for LA County (called the ASV)

🗳️ The last two drops disproportionately supported Raman. Are those coming from specific neighborhoods since they’re such an anomaly? Or are the neighborhoods pretty spread out that you count from on a given day? “We’re not sure.”

💌 If you’re unable to sign, you can make a “mark” like a dot or slash instead of signing. A witness then signs below.

I asked them how they verify these signatures. Turns out, they simply don’t.

Well, you must check the witness signatures, right? “No, we don’t.”

So what if I stole a ballot, made a dash by the person’s name, and signed my name? “You shouldn’t do that, but in theory it would be counted,” they said.

How many of these “marked” ballots get in per election? “We don’t know,” they said.

Ripe for fraud, no?

[Jennifer Callahan @jenlynncallahan]

Wildest takeaways from my time at the Ballot Processing Center today.

✍🏻 Signatures only need to be 40% accurate (!) this is the setting the machines are set at for LA County (called the ASV)

🗳️ The last two drops disproportionately supported Raman. Are those coming from specific neighborhoods since they’re such an anomaly? Or are the neighborhoods pretty spread out that you count from on a given day? “We’re not sure.”

💌 If you’re unable to sign, you can make a “mark” like a dot or slash instead of signing. A witness then signs below.

I asked them how they verify these signatures. Turns out, they simply don’t.

Well, you must check the witness signatures, right? “No, we don’t.”

So what if I stole a ballot, made a dash by the person’s name, and signed my name? “You shouldn’t do that, but in theory it would be counted,” they said.

How many of these “marked” ballots get in per election? “We don’t know,” they said.

Ripe for fraud, no?

[Seth Keshel @RealSKeshel]

40% accurate signatures when most signatures these days are scribbles.

Yea, they’re stuffing ballots by the millions in California.

The only ingredient needed = TIME

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The reason ID is banned in California (and New York) elections is to enable large-scale fraud.

When you combine no ID and mail-in voting, fraud is de facto legalized.

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@matthewstoller So the city can continue to get destroyed by drug addicts and welfare addicts instead?

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@grok @chriswithans Explain the significant increase in turnout despite the fact that there is an incumbent and a bunch of shit candidates

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@drawandstrike Most of these ballots are harvested and dropped into collection boxes - they are not handled by the USPS after they are initially delivered. Nothing will happen.

[Chris @chriswithans]

I don’t believe the expected turnout in Los Angeles for Mayor.

They’re saying about 870,000 votes total when all votes are counted?

2022 mayoral election was 646,000. They had three then-strong candidates in Bass, the well-funded Caruso, and former speaker de Leon.

But 2026 will have 34.6% more votes? Hard to believe.

Really looks like Raman had a turbocharged last-minute ballot harvesting operation. That’s what Occam’s razor will tell you.

[Los Angeles Times @latimes]

How a simple mix-up fueled false conspiracies about L.A. vote count https://t.co/XizGDXGXOV

[Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll]

That "Simple Mix-Up"

LAT: "According to a Times review of election night results data, The Times pulled data from the AP's feed at approximately 8:35 p.m. that included 0 new votes for Pratt and eight other candidates.

When The Times' system next checked for new numbers a minute later, there was an update with votes for Pratt but no new votes for Raman, Bass and others.

"The AP vote count receives updates as provided by election officials and adds them to our vote count. What happened in this case is that there was a lag in an automated update such that some candidates' votes were added in one update and the other candidates followed about a minute later," the Associated Press said in a statement to The Times.

"Specifically, an electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes for only one group of candidates, including Karen Bass and Nithya Raman.

Exactly one minute later, the electronic update picked up the votes for another group of candidates including Spencer Pratt. Taken together, the updates included 21,870 votes for Pratt, 12,850 votes for Bass and 9,521 votes for Raman, along with votes for other candidates."

The Times' election results page relies on the AP's data feed, and checks for updates once a minute."

Questions Media Should Have Answers To -
- What caused this unexpected "lag," specifically?
- Were there any system changes at AP Data?
- If there were, when were those changes made?
- Were AP Data users alerted to changes and if so when?
- Was The LA County Registrar of Voters alerted?
- What caused votes here to be split between two updates?
- Why did the 1st update "(pull) in votes for only one group of candidates?"
- How were the two groups determined?
- Was anyone at the Registrars office alerted when this incident happened?
- Who alerted them and when?

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@grok @chriswithans Riggggggggght

[TBONE585 @tbone_585]

@grahamformaine Do you put your phone down to post in X when you aren’t abusing women?

[Aaron Torres @Aaron_Torres]

I try not to get political. But LA is where I live, and I am here to tell you: There is 0.0 percent chance these results are legit.

Nithya Raman has no base. No one knew who she was until Spencer Pratt torched her on debate stage. She gave a concession speech on Tuesday.

I really hope the federal government and @USAttyEssayli are investigating

(Again, apologize for getting political. Feel free to unfollow if this bothers you.

But a light needs to be shined on what's happening)

[David Pollack @DavidPollackUSA]

You’re going to hear a lot of liberals in the media tell you that mail in ballots favor democrats so this is totally normal…but is it totally normal for mail in ballots that come in after Election Day to overwhelmingly favor the third place candidate that didn’t perform nearly this well until after the Republican beat her? You are witnessing a hoax in real time. Trust your gut. Ignore the left wing narrative.

[Seth Keshel @RealSKeshel]

Mail-in voting should be banned

[David Marcus @BlueBoxDave]

Guys, relax. It’s perfectly normal. It’s just a voting system where 7 days after the election Democrats get enough votes to win.

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

BREAKING: Dozens of Christians were massacred in Ethiopia over the course of the last week by Islamists.

Tens of thousands of Christians have been slaughtered by Islamists across Africa, and the world doesn’t seem to care.