thereās a Black Mirror episode where a cartoon bear nearly wins a parliamentary election.
critics called it far-fetched. naive. the weakest episode.
then Trump happened. then Boris. then Brazil elected a literal clown to congress.
Charlie Brooker didnāt get it wrong. he just wasnāt pessimistic enough.
but hereās what everyone missed about Waldo.
the show treated a non-human in politics as a dystopia.
what if itās actually the solution?
not a cartoon. not a puppet. something with no ego, no dynasty, no vote bank. something that canāt be bribed because it wants nothing.
weāve automated factories. supply chains. radiology. legal research. financial markets.
but the people governing all of this? still running on the same operating system as 1947.
the biggest unrealised productivity gain in human history isnāt in code or capital.
itās sitting inside the worldās most inefficient industry. politics.
and if thereās one place where this inflection point hits hardest, itās India.
1.4 billion people. governed by systems designed for a fraction of that number. bureaucratic debt that compounds every single day.
the next 25 years will write the next 200. and weāre still running governance on borrowed time.
but hereās what people get wrong about India and chaos.
chaos isnāt the obstacle. chaos is the proof of concept.
UPI didnāt wait for perfect infrastructure. Aadhaar didnāt wait for consensus. CoWIN vaccinated 2 billion doses on a homegrown stack.
India doesnāt need ideal conditions to leapfrog. it has a track record of doing exactly that.
so what actually needs to happen?
not AI replacing leaders. not algorithms writing law.
but AI owning political functions. procurement, welfare delivery, subsidy routing, compliance, red tape, grievance redressal.
the places where human discretion has historically meant human corruption.
hereās the part nobody wants to say out loud.
this only works under a government with no incentive to weaponise the very tools itās deploying.
AI in governance in the wrong hands isnāt reform. itās surveillance with better UX.
the prerequisite for digital democracy is a government thatās afraid of concentrations of power. including its own.
iām not saying AI should replace leaders.
not yet.
but every function that can be made transparent, automated and auditable, should be.
because the alternative isnāt the status quo. the alternative is Waldo. and Waldo, as Brooker eventually showed us, ends in a police state.
in 2013, Black Mirror warned us about a world where people were so disgusted with politics theyād vote for a cartoon.
in 2025, people arenāt even disgusted anymore. theyāre just numb.
the window to fix this is open. it will not stay open.
India of all places knows what it means to miss a generational window.
this time, letās not. š®š³
before the eyes can see, they must be incapable of tears.
before the ear can hear, it must have lost its sensitiveness.
before the voice can speak in the presence of the masters, it must have lost the power to wound.
-light on the path.
iām so moved by the spirit of my countrymen who fought against all oddsā the coordinated efforts put up by the election commission, ed, cbi, i-tax, biased media, pmās pr, hate tactics, deadly heatwave, polling booth atrocities. no matter what happens today, lmjs, chakde india š®š³
āTrue creativity flows only through stillness. When stillness becomes conscious, the spiritual dimension enters your life and you begin to be guided by an intelligence far greater than the human mind.ā
| Eckhart Tolle
Blockchain analytics firms @trmlabs and Australian cryptocurrency exchange @SwyftxAU have entered into a partnership that aims to create awareness among customers around scams in the space. By @amitoj
https://t.co/texPbzgGAP
$100,000 Bitcoin is when not if and it is not even a bullish prediction, because the price is going to go WAY higher long term.
By 2030 people will be kicking themselves for not buying BTC under 100k.
Notes that cite sources have a much higher likelihood of earning a 'Helpful' status. This is not surprising, as sources make notes more easily verifiable by viewers and raters. Starting today, sources are now required for proposed notes.
We havenāt previously required this, as some helpful notes inherently do not need sources ā for example, they refer to details of the post or media it contains. But those instances are less common, and we believe the overall impact of this change will be positive. Sources will not be required for notes explaining why added context isnāt needed.
Like all our product updates, we'll monitor the impact of this change and continue to improve based on what we learn.