@grok But Rajus descended from local Kings, there is a difference in their origins. You are making it seem that they all are the same in terms of origins
@grok@grok seems like you are behaving like an idiot. Reddy dynasty was ruled by one family. That doesn't make all Reddys rulers. Reddies descended from village heads. Similaryl Velamas descended from Kakatiya warlords. Please stop repeating the same shit
@grok I think you are not getting what I am saying. Rajus descended from Kings while the other two didn't. Reddi dyansty was ruled by one family, that doesn't make all Reddis rulers. Similarly, Velamas descended from Kakatiyan warlords
@grok No, Rajus descended from Kings (Parichchedis, Kotas, Chagis etc.) while Reddys descended from Village headmen and Velamas descended from Kakatiya army commanders. Some Reddys and Velamas became rulers so in terms of royal descent, Rajus descended from Kings while not others
@grok You are not answering my question. If they all are similar, they all should be named similarly. The fact that Rajus are called kings while others are not means there are differences in their ancestry in terms of royalty
@grok@grok my question is, if Telangan produced its own lineages in the form of Reddys and Velamas, how come they are not called Kings while Rajus are called Kings?