Joe Rogan says he no number believes in charities and that they’re a scam
“I used to think that charity was real, and now I look at it and I go, ‘Oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no.’ This is a giant scam that's wrapped up in virtue”
“It's wrapped up in a nice cozy blanket of being kind and compassionate and virtuous and doing good things for people all around the world." — And then they find out how it really works… — some of them are making $1 million a year. And you're like, what is this? Yeah, what is this?
This is a business. This isn't really charity. Most of the money is going to your employees and your overhead. And why do you have such a big building? Like, what are you doing?”
It’s all a scam. Just look at these salaries of “charities”
Here are just 5 high paid charity nonprofit CEOs I found in the US
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, $6,979,162 (Selwyn Vickers)
- City of Hope & Affiliates, $5,460,799 (Robert W. Stone)
- American Heart Association, $4,563,563 (Nancy Brown)
- Shriners Hospitals for Children, $4,000,753 (John McCabe, Executive VP)
- National Jewish Health, $3,945,101 (Michael S. Salem)
Again the is only the CEO salary per year, then you add on everyone else’s salaries
It’s all a scam. These are really for profit companies funneling all the money into salaries and massive facilities like palaces. End the nonprofit loophole
Even smaller nonprofits like the San Diego Humane Society take in $72 million and spend $43 million on salaries, they pay their CEO $40,000 per month
Again, it’s what a scam
Robin Williams’ emotional tribute to the American Flag leaves an entire stadium speechless — then in tears.
Is there a single Hollywood star who would give this performance today?
Total Patriot.
RIP Legend 🇺🇸
A quote widely attributed to Nathan Mayer Rothschild - though its exact provenance is debated - captures the operating philosophy of the network with precision:
'I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man that controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.'
Whether Nathan said these exact words is less important than whether they are accurate.
By 1825, Nathan Rothschild was supplying coin to the Bank of England itself to prevent a liquidity crisis. A private banker had become the lender of last resort to the central bank of the world's most powerful empire.
By 1875, his son Natty Rothschild could finance the British government’s purchase of the Suez Canal - the most strategically vital maritime chokepoint on earth - on his personal guarantee, overnight, without consulting his own partners.
By 1909, the British Chancellor described Natty as 'the most powerful man in Britain.'
The quote may be apocryphal. The power it describes is documented.
WATCH journalist and author Dr. @stephenkinzer’s opening statement at today’s explosive MK Ultra hearing regarding the over classification of secret government programs and the CIA’s quest to weaponize mind control against Americans.
Donald Trump revealed on Joe Rogan what he believes is the real reason Americans still pay a federal income tax.
Trump says foreign countries pressured the U.S. to abandon tariffs, while politicians went along with it because they were serving foreign interests instead of the American people.
“In the early 1900, they switched over stupidly to an income tax. And you know why? Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America. We don't wanna pay tariffs. Believe me, they control our politicians. If you look at the kind of numbers that these guys make then and now.”
“We are all literally paying an income tax because U.S. politicians are taking bribes from foreign countries to enrich themselves.”
الجانب المظلم لوول ستريت: كيف ساهم والد رئيس أمريكي في تمويل صعود أدولف هتلر وبناء الآلة العسكرية النازية؟تفاصيل من الأرشيف الأمريكي 👇
2️⃣ في عام 1942، بينما كان الجنود الأمريكيون يقاتلون النازية في أوروبا، اتخذت الحكومة الأمريكية قراراً بمصادرة أصول بنك (UBC) في نيويورك بتهمة "التجارة مع العدو". المفاجأة؟ مدير هذا البنك كان بريسكوت بوش، والد وجد رئيسين للولايات المتحدة!
3️⃣ القصة تبدأ من عشرينيات القرن الماضي؛ حيث كان بريسكوت بوش يدير الذراع الاستثمارية في وول ستريت لملياردير الصلب الألماني "فريتز تايسن". تايسن لم يكن مجرد رجل أعمال عادياً، بل كان يلقب بـ "الممول الأول" لأدولف هتلر والحزب النازي في بداياته.
4️⃣ لم يكن الدعم مجرد أوراق؛ ففي عام 1933، قاد تايسن تحالفاً من رجال الأعمال لجمع 3 ملايين مارك ألماني لدعم حملة هتلر الانتخابية. هذا الضخ المالي الضخم هو الذي مكن الحزب النازي من اكتساح البر��مان وإحكام قبضته المطلقة على حكم ألمانيا.
5️⃣ لكن ما الذي كان يموله البنك الذي يديره بوش في نيويورك تحديداً؟ الإجابة: عصب الحرب. استخدم البنك كقناة مالية آمنة لتوفير السيولة النقدية بالدولار والذهب لتأسيس وإدارة "شركة الصلب المتحدة" أضخم مجمع صناعي حربي في ألمانيا النازية.
6️⃣ هذا الفولاذ والصلب الذي جرى تمويله وحماية أصوله عبر وول ستريت، تحول مباشرة في المصانع الألمانية إلى الدبابات والمدرعات والمدافع والسفن الحربية التي اجتاح بها هتلر أوروبا وأشعل بها الحرب العالمية الثانية.
7️⃣ الأمر لم يتوقف عند الصناعة؛ بل امتدت الشراكة لشركات مناجم مثل (Silesian-American). هذه الشركات اتُهمت لاحقاً في وثائق الأرشيف الوطني الأمريكي باستخدام "عمال الس��رة والمعتقلين" من معسكرات الاعتقال النازية لزيادة الإنتاج الحربي.
8️⃣ التحقيقات الفيدرالية الأمريكية في الأربعينيات خلصت إلى أن بريسكوت بوش لم يكن "��ؤدلجاً نازياً" أو متعاطفاً مع هتلر سياسياً، بل كان "رأسمالياً بحتاً" يرى في صعود النازية فرصة استثمارية وتجارية لا تُعوض، بغض النظر عن الثمن الإنساني.
9️⃣ المشهد الختامي للأزمة يحمل المفارقة الأكبر؛ ففي عام 1951 رفعت الحكومة الأمريكية التجميد عن تلك الأصول المصادرة، واستعاد بريسكوت بوش ثروته وأرباحه المتراكمة من تلك الشراكة، والتي قُدرت بنحو 1.5 مليون دولار (ثروة طائلة بمقاييس ذلك الزمان).
🔟 هذه الأموال المستردة من إمبراطورية الصلب المرتبطة بهتلر، كانت هي النواة المالية التي مولت صعود عائلة بوش في قطاع النفط بتكساس، ومهدت الطريق لبناء النفوذ السياسي ا��ذي أوصل جورج بوش الأب، ثم الابن، إلى عرش البيت الأبيض. نهاية الثريد.
What if I told you most of the people masquerading around these days as 'British royalty' and 'British lords' are not really British at all?
Many of the "British royal" families came to the UK very long ago from...somewhere else.
It isn't much commented on these days. It's considered in 'bad taste' and 'conspiracy mongering' to point out many of the British royals are not ethnic Brits. They came from the old PRUSSIAN EMPIRE region.
It assumed these old Prussian royal families all completely assimilated into their new nation, lost their previous ethnic/familial identity, and became patriotic and loyal Brits. Yes, people do assume this.
But this assumption is...shall we say...INCORRECT.
These royals have higher loyalties.
The people who own and run the BBC, MI:6, work for these people.
They're not gonna say shit.
And in case anybody should think I am just making this up or exaggerating it:
https://t.co/Mq1WLBqYQk
🚨 Democrats laundered our tax money to George Soros so he could send it back as campaign donations
- Before leaving office Democrats sent $260 MILLION DOLLARS TO GEORGE SOROS
- Now George Soros has spent $103 million dollars during the 2026 midterms on Democrats, making him their largest donor
Do you understand what this means. Democrats literally laundered George Soros hundreds of millions of dollars of our tax money before leaving office so that he could use it to fund their campaigns
Democrat leaders and George Soros need to go to federal prison
This is literally textbook money laundering
Gary Brecka, who chairs Bobby Kennedy's MAHA action committee, says America's food system was engineered to make you sick on purpose.
He's careful with his words for most of the interview. Not here. Brecka argues the disastrous dietary guidelines Americans grew up trusting were never an accident.
BRECKA: "That food pyramid wasn't architected by accident. Lucky Charms wasn't more nutritious than grass-fed steak by accident. Highly processed foods didn't make it to the top of the chart. That was intentional."
"We are undoing decades of intentional malfeasance that, in my opinion—not to be a conspiracy theorist—was designed to make the American population sick and more dependent on drugs."
DR. PHIL: "I couldn't agree with you more, and I don't think it's just wild conspiracy theory."
TEXAS SBOE VOTES TO REMOVE AMERICAN REVOLUTION FROM 11TH-GRADE U.S. HISTORY
The board approved changes Wednesday that eliminate coverage of the Battles of Lexington and Concord, substituting study of Oprah Winfrey in the revised social studies TEKS.
Final reading scheduled for Friday.
https://t.co/QgVKxrr3ZE
My name is Ella, I'm 17 years old.
I do long jump. I play volleyball. I go to school in New Richmond, Wisconsin.
When my school allowed a biological male into the girls' restroom without telling parents —
I went to the school board.
With my name attached.
In my own town.
I got bullied for it. Harassed online. Even some of my own teachers came after me.
I'm still here.
Because here's what I know:
The net in women's volleyball is set nearly a foot lower for a reason.
A biological male can hit a ball across that net at force that could seriously injure a girl.
And in track — all it takes is three biological males entering the girls' category
and not a single girl in this state stands on a podium.
I didn't speak up because it was easy.
I spoke up because somebody had to.
The Supreme Court is about to answer the question every girl in America is asking.
We're ready.
@JenniferSey@xx_xyathletics
Joe Rogan and Taylor Sheridan just had a raw conversation about Tulsi Gabbard’s final act as Director of National Intelligence exposing Fauci.
ROGAN: “Tulsi Gabbard gave that press conference about Fauci and she talked about how he lied in front of Congress and that he absolutely used American tax funds to fund gain of function research through EcoHealth Alliance and through the Wuhan lab… and you know no one's covering it.”
SHERIDAN: “Didn't we all know that already?”
ROGAN: “Well, we knew it, but my parents didn't. People that just like just read the newspapers and watch TV, they don't know.”
SHERIDAN: “I've never seen anything as flagrantly obvious as COVID coming from the Wuhan lab.”
“You've got news anchors keeping a straight face saying it came from the wet market.”
ROGAN: “This was a courageous step… calling it out and saying that it came from a lab in Wuhan, China was somehow conflated with racism.”
SHERIDAN: “Fauci had attorneys reaching out to Biden's camp the last day when he got the pardon. Geez, it's just a preemptive pardon is nuts.”
ROGAN: “By every definition, it's gain of function research. And Fauci is still saying, ‘You do not know what you are talking about.’”
“If you read RFK Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he ran this exact same playbook during the AIDS pandemic. The villain is Anthony Fauci.”
🇨🇴🇺🇸| URGENTE: El presidente electo de Colombia Abelardo de la Espriella, le responde al Secretario de Guerra de EE.UU. Pete Hegseth su invitación para ser parte del Escudo de las Américas:
“A partir del 7 de agosto, Colombia hará parte del Escudo de las Américas. Colombia NO será más gobernado por un gobierno complaciente con el narco terrorismo, pasaremos a combatirlo como corresponde”.
August, 2021. Mayorkas goes to the Southern border and announces a bunch of USAID funded programs to improve the lives of the people in Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.
We later found out that USAID funds were being used by NGOs to bring people to the border so they could enter our country illegally.
All on the American taxpayer's dime.
Elon Musk just proved that ownership in America is a legal fiction.
Musk: “You get taxed on what you earn, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own.”
Think about what property tax actually means.
You worked for decades. Paid it off in full. The deed is in your name.
Stop paying the government its annual fee. Watch them take it and sell it to someone who will.
You never owned that house. You were leasing it from an entity you never signed a contract with.
Income tax tells the same truth in softer packaging.
The government does not take a portion of your earnings. They decide how much of your own labor you are permitted to keep.
That is not semantics. It is a confession of who the system believes your time belongs to first.
Sales tax buries itself in the receipt. Two people exchange value voluntarily. A third party who contributed nothing takes a cut simply for allowing it to happen.
Now stack all three.
Taxed when you create. Taxed when you spend. Taxed when you hold. Taxed again when you die and try to pass it to your children.
At no point in that cycle does the system recognize your output as yours.
Because money is not an abstraction. It is crystallized human lifespan.
Every dollar taxed is an hour you already lived, already bled for, already gone.
The state is not managing an economy. It is claiming dominion over time you will never get back.
And spending it on systems you never asked for and actively oppose.
The institution extracting all of it faces zero obligation to perform. A contractor who delivers nothing gets fired. A bureaucracy that burns through trillions gets a budget increase the next fiscal year.
SpaceX pays taxes to the agencies that obstruct its launches. Tesla funds the regulators drafting rules to shield its competitors.
The builders are not subsidizing government. They are financing their own friction.
The tax code is 74,000 pages long. Not because the economy demands it. Because the extraction had to be buried in enough complexity that you would stop asking who it was designed to protect.
The past belonged to the people who taxed the world.
The future belongs to the people who build it.
In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.
Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.
The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.
When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.
How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?
An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.
And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.
Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.
If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?
Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵