@StrykerBrig24@BJCox429@cperez3220@DesireeAmerica4 They didn't say they weren't allowed but if you're dog is not under control and is in the process of committing an assault on you then you have the right to use ordinary force to defend yourself.
@johnhawkinsrwn@michaeljknowles language can't be 'wrong.' Otherwise there wouldn't be so many languages and they would always stay the same. The very fact that they change shows that 'wrong' just becomes right.
@DadicusBodicus@Kevinish dude. passing is not in the equation is this situation. Freese has to boot that thing into the 15th row of the stands and let the team regroup.
So to recap what happened with the USMNT:
• Balogun received a bogus red card
• VAR protocol isn't followed (no slow-mo)
• Trump calls Infantino to ask about the process
• US Soccer lawyers preapre & submit an appeal
FIFA's independent 18-person disciplinary committee then met, approved the appeal, and told Balogun he could play in Monday's match against Belgium.
That's what everyone is complaining about?
All rules were followed, and that same process is open to every other country. The only difference is everyone knows the red card was a mistake to begin with.
@Iovesnakee@VTHistory25 All we know is Trump asked them to review and for all we know they were reviewing it anyway. Unless you have more evidence of anything more nefarious, I wouldn't call it 'shocking interference.'
@NotSagdyev@VTHistory25 Dirty move? LMAO. If anything, it was a foul on the Bosnian player. They initiated contact from behind and put Balogun off balance. Balogun wasn't even facing him. How could he be dirty?
@SimonTSN690 Your last example just agreed with whom you're quoting. He's saying the rule should be called converse to how it is, instead of any body part being offside makes your offside it's any part being onside makes you onside like your foul ball example.
@secnumbersguy@k_favaloro Very similar to how Alabama still went undefeated in the SEC in 2008. The SEC Championship game doesn't count as a conference game. It's a tiebreaker that decides the result. Just like PKs.
@jeffreytucker 70+ pages of a textualist/originalist talking like the Constitution is a 'living document' and interpreting with the facts of today rather than what the words actually say.
Matt Walsh, and many like him, have the sole occupation of spreading rage. It’s how he feeds his family. He wants you locked in a rage spiral so that he can make money. He is occupationally incapable of not melting down. Once you realize it, it explains everything that he does.